Hi Gary,
I just tested your example, also on Intrepid with 0.98.3, and I get the
exact same behaviour as you, with white pixels in the left column. But I
have no idea why, sorry.
Sünnje
-Original Message-
From: Gary Ruben [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue 12/2/2008 11:13
To:
Hi all,
I've searched the mailing archive, and I can't find an anwser to my problem :
i'm running Python2.5 on a WinXP32 box. I just reinstalled cygwin to exclude a
version-problem. Matplotlib version is 0.98.3 (got from easy_install matplotlib
command)
i'm just trying this :
from
I'm wondering whether someone can reproduce the following problem I'm
seeing in Ubuntu Intrepid.
I often use matplotlib to save images created with imshow to take
advantage of matplotlib's colour maps. I've noticed that the behaviour
is different for 0.98.3 between Windows XP-32 and Ubuntu
I just realised that the example I gave may not be the best since it's
not obvious what the autoscaling will do when all array values are
equal. Nevertheless, even when the array contains a range of values and
I use a greyscale colourmap, I'm seeing the leftmost pixel column set to
all white
I am indeed using ipython 0.8.1. Will try to upgrade and see how it goes.
Indeed this looks like the deadlocks people mentioned, within, as Xavier
emphasised, no way to CTRL-C it to kill it.
thanks for the tips
Eric
Yannick Copin wrote:
Salut Eric,
Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2008 20:08:00 +0100
There is an explicit offset of one pixel on the left when it sets up a
clip box in Agg. I don't know why this is there, but it dates back to
0.98.0, and earlier versions did something completely different. I can
only guess it was to compensate for an earlier bug in the precise
drawing of the
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 7:44 AM, Nils Wagner
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I would like to visualize the ovality of a perturbed
circular path by a polar plot.
How can I improve the view wrt to scaling and ticks ?
ylim(0, 2)
yticks(arange(0, 2, 0.25))
Thank you for your reply.
It is
Salut Eric,
Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2008 20:08:00 +0100
From: Eric Emsellem [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Matplotlib-users] pylab or not... crashes or not
- when I start a session with ipython -pylab I often get crashes with my
session. When I mean often, it means really often like once everything
All right,
as information for all :
reinstalling cygwin from scratch, reinstalling python from scratch, and finaly
matplotlib now works...
Cheers,
Thomas
**
Thomas Lecocq
Geologist
Ph.D.Student (Seismology)
Royal Observatory of Belgium
**
From:
Hi there,
telling pyplot
polar([1,2,3,4],[1,3,4,2], o)
to my surprise does not give me 4 distinct points but rather some
interpolated points as well. This is highly unexpected, nay, unwanted.
It used to work well in Fedora 8 (don't know which version I ran
there).
Fedora 10
Python 2.5.2
Hi all,
If I run the attached example I obtain no polar plots, but
a view like plot(t,r_1) - for what reason ?
Nils
python -i test_subplot_polar.py --verbose-helpful
$HOME=/home/nwagner
CONFIGDIR=/home/nwagner/.matplotlib
/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/matplotlib/__init__.py:662:
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 10:12 AM, Wildemar Wildenburger
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi there,
telling pyplot
polar([1,2,3,4],[1,3,4,2], o)
to my surprise does not give me 4 distinct points but rather some
interpolated points as well. This is highly unexpected, nay, unwanted.
It used to
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 11:07 AM, Nils Wagner
[EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Hi all,
If I run the attached example I obtain no polar plots, but a view like
plot(t,r_1) - for what reason ?
You need to specify polar=True to the subplot commands. Try this:
from pylab import subplot, polar, linspace,
On Tue, 2 Dec 2008 11:14:48 -0600
Ryan May [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 11:07 AM, Nils Wagner
[EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Hi all,
If I run the attached example I obtain no polar plots,
but a view like
plot(t,r_1) - for what reason ?
You need to specify polar=True to the
Yeah. This is a known bug that was fixed since 0.98.1.
Cheers,
Mike
Ryan May wrote:
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 10:12 AM, Wildemar Wildenburger
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi there,
telling pyplot
polar([1,2,3,4],[1,3,4,2], o)
to my surprise does
On Tue, 02 Dec 2008 12:43:14 -0500 Michael Droettboom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Yeah. This is a known bug that was fixed since 0.98.1.
Rats! Lets hope the Fedora guys are quick with the updating.
Thanks for ending my head-banging, though.
/W
running the last ipython version now (0.9.1), and it does not help (got stuck
the same way).
The difference now is that ipython provides a message:
Warning: Timeout for mainloop thread exceeded
switching to nonthreaded mode (until mainloop wakes up again)
It seems that ipython developers did
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 11:27 AM, Nils Wagner
[EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Thank you very much !
It would be nice to have that information in the docstring
Done.
The next inquiry is related to xticks.
I have added
xticks(linspace(0,2*pi,24,endpoint=False))
The difference between consecutive
The next inquiry is related to xticks.
I have added
xticks(linspace(0,2*pi,24,endpoint=False))
The difference between consecutive xticks is varying between 14 and 16
degrees.
The following works around the roundoff for me:
xticks(linspace(0, 360, 24, endpoint=False) * pi/180.)
Ryan
--
Ryan May wrote:
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 11:27 AM, Nils Wagner
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Thank you very much !
It would be nice to have that information in the docstring
Done.
Thanks for updating the docstring. I actually saw this as a usability
bug and
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 12:09 PM, Eric Emsellem
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Really annoying but as mentioned before, I cannot get a set of commands which
consistenly break the session, so...
Since there does not appear to be an easy diagnosis or fix, you may
want to consider switching your backend
Michael Droettboom wrote:
Thanks for updating the docstring. I actually saw this as a usability
bug and have come up with a patch such that polar() (et al) will
*replace* the current axes with a polar plot if it isn't already polar.
This is (from the user's perspective) similar to how,
I've committed both of these things. The subplot()/polar() change seems
tricky, so it may produce some breakage even though the regression
tests are passing. Please let me know if you see anything strange
after this change.
Mike
Ryan May wrote:
Michael Droettboom wrote:
Thanks for
Thanks for the rapid fix Mike.
regards,
Gary
Michael Droettboom wrote:
There is an explicit offset of one pixel on the left when it sets up a
clip box in Agg. I don't know why this is there, but it dates back to
0.98.0, and earlier versions did something completely different. I can
only
João et al.,
Thanks for the bug report. Mike D. has fixed the problem in svn. (I had
moved the discussion to matplotlib-devel; I am just reporting back to
matplotlib-users so this thread can be closed.)
Eric
Eric Firing wrote:
wafels wrote:
Hello,
I can confirm and extend this bug
Thank you for your answers and the obvious solution (banging head into wall).
Best regards,
Jesper
2008/12/1 Jae-Joon Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 12:56 AM, Jesper Larsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Matplotlib users,
I have a web application in which I would like to scale
26 matches
Mail list logo
