On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 11:57 PM, Nelle Varoquaux
wrote:
> On 2 July 2013 16:33, Anthony Scopatz wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 9:04 AM, Jason Grout >
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On 7/1/13 9:33 AM, Michael Droettboom wrote:
> >> > SciPy 2013 was a great success. I didn't get good headcount at th
On 2 July 2013 16:33, Anthony Scopatz wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 9:04 AM, Jason Grout
> wrote:
>>
>> On 7/1/13 9:33 AM, Michael Droettboom wrote:
>> > SciPy 2013 was a great success. I didn't get good headcount at the
>> > matplotlib BOF, but it was a good number, and we had 15 participan
On 07/02/2013 10:04 AM, Jason Grout wrote:
On 7/1/13 9:33 AM, Michael Droettboom wrote:
SciPy 2013 was a great success. I didn't get good headcount at the
matplotlib BOF, but it was a good number, and we had 15 participants at
various points during the sprints. It was nice to see the diversity
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 9:04 AM, Jason Grout wrote:
> On 7/1/13 9:33 AM, Michael Droettboom wrote:
> > SciPy 2013 was a great success. I didn't get good headcount at the
> > matplotlib BOF, but it was a good number, and we had 15 participants at
> > various points during the sprints. It was nice
On 7/1/13 9:33 AM, Michael Droettboom wrote:
> SciPy 2013 was a great success. I didn't get good headcount at the
> matplotlib BOF, but it was a good number, and we had 15 participants at
> various points during the sprints. It was nice to see the diversity of
> experience with matplotlib at the
SciPy 2013 was a great success. I didn't get good headcount at the
matplotlib BOF, but it was a good number, and we had 15 participants at
various points during the sprints. It was nice to see the diversity of
experience with matplotlib at the sprints, and I hope we oldtimers were
helpful to
