Re: smbfs: questions and issues

> I re-discover smbfs after few years, I see it's still as slow and > itchy as it was Yes, the performance and bugginess of Samba / smbfs have not been improving at all. Which is probably not the developers' fault, but a poorly designed protocol. If your setup allows it, you might want to

Re: smbfs: questions and issues

Hello Yury, On Thu, 5 May 2016 10:35:41 +0200 (CEST) "Yury V. Zaytsev" wrote: > On Thu, 5 May 2016, wwp wrote: > > > I've added a smbfs link to my hotlist, and now I see a bunch of > > questions/issues: > > Currently, mc's smbfs is currently outdated, insecure and badly

Re: smbfs: questions and issues

On Thu, 5 May 2016, wwp wrote: I've added a smbfs link to my hotlist, and now I see a bunch of questions/issues: Currently, mc's smbfs is currently outdated, insecure and badly broken. At some point, Slava undertook a rewrite, but it was never finished, and apparently nobody is really