On Thu, 13 Jul 2006, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
The shell prompt string itself.
ok. maybe it would make sense to implement an own bash-compatible PS1
interpreter. trying to make sense of almost arbitrary program output
sort of has to fail.
Maybe we can even borrow the code directly from bash
On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 08:11:55AM +0300, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
* execution of commands typed at MC's prompt widget trough the
subshell
read my lips: NO WAY IN HELL. ;)
this is one of the few actual selling points of mc over all the other
The prompt widget or the fact that if the
Hi Andy,
On Thu, 2006-07-13 at 17:22 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
Jindrich Novy пишет:
My $0.02 to specfile highliting.
The mc shipped with FC4 doesn't handle correctly the case-insensivity
tags. For example, BuildArch and Buildarch are highliting differently,
but rpm recognize both.
I
On Fri, 14 Jul 2006, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 08:11:55AM +0300, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
* execution of commands typed at MC's prompt widget trough the
subshell
read my lips: NO WAY IN HELL. ;)
this is one of the few actual selling points of mc over all the other
On Fri, 14 Jul 2006, Jindrich Novy wrote:
Hi Andy,
On Thu, 2006-07-13 at 17:22 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
Jindrich Novy ??:
My $0.02 to specfile highliting.
The mc shipped with FC4 doesn't handle correctly the case-insensivity
tags. For example, BuildArch and Buildarch are
Follow-up Comment #4, bug #15461 (project mc):
? First you commit Jindrich's patch that highlights obsolete tags
differently, and now you commit this patch removing these tags??
I think removing these tags from trpm makes sense: trpm is for browsing
installed rpms, so I do not expect many
Follow-up Comment #5, bug #15461 (project mc):
Sorry for the confusion: Browsing rpms of course has nothing to do with
(syntax) highlighting, so please ignore my last paragraph.
The fact remains that keeping these obsolete tags around to be able to browse
legacy rpms doesn't hurt.
(FYI I do
Jindrich Novy пишет:
My $0.02 to specfile highliting.
The mc shipped with FC4 doesn't handle correctly the case-insensivity
tags. For example, BuildArch and Buildarch are highliting differently,
but rpm recognize both.
I guess the mainstream also has this issue.
--
With best regards,
Andy
Follow-up Comment #6, bug #15461 (project mc):
Well, that was my concern initially but since noone cared to share his
opinion I figured that it doesn't really matter so much. If you feel that
those tags are indeed needed - please feel free to revert parts of the
patch.
Update of bug #15461 (project mc):
Status: Fixed = Postponed
___
Follow-up Comment #7:
Ok. I will (revert). (Introduction of EPOCH was indeed overdue.)
See also
Hi,
On Fri, 2006-07-14 at 15:33 +0200, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, 2006-07-14 at 09:24 +0200, Jindrich Novy wrote:
On Thu, 2006-07-13 at 17:22 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
Jindrich Novy пишет:
My $0.02 to specfile highliting.
The mc shipped with FC4 doesn't handle
On Thu, 06 Jul 2006 14:35:27 +0300
Andy Shevchenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ForestCreature пишет:
Hello! I've recently noticed wrong file sort order in file list
pannels. I use ru_RU.KOI8-R locale. There is no alphabetic symbol
order (what strcmp implies?). Attached patch works for me.
12 matches
Mail list logo
