RE: MD: AVLS (was: equipment advice, regarding the future)

1999-08-01 Thread Tony Antoniou
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of PrinceGaz Sent: Sunday, 1 August 1999 7:04 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: MD: AVLS (was: equipment advice, regarding the future) Tony Antoniou (aka LarZ) wrote: > So what you really need, to prevent damaging your hearing,

Re: MD: AVLS (was: equipment advice, regarding the future)

1999-07-31 Thread PrinceGaz
Tony Antoniou (aka LarZ) wrote: > So what you really need, to prevent damaging your hearing, is a pair of > Etymotic headphones with their 27dB attenuation of outside noise 3#-) I take it they are "active" negative-feedback noise reducing phones? Rather than spend a few dozen dollars on phones,

Re: MD: AVLS (was: equipment advice, regarding the future)

1999-07-31 Thread J. Coon
I think that is worth repeating... If the ambient noise level is so high that you can't hear your music without playing it at dangerous levels, just don't play it. OTOH, you can buy stock in hearing aid companies and maybe make a mint. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On 30 Jul 99, at 16:49, Stev

RE: MD: AVLS (was: equipment advice, regarding the future)

1999-07-31 Thread Tony Antoniou
PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Steven Brooks Sent: Saturday, 31 July 1999 7:49 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Re: MD: AVLS (was: equipment advice, regarding the future) They will also tell you (and so can I) that while impatiently waiting for a train, the platform, during 'regular'

Re: MD: AVLS (was: equipment advice, regarding the future)

1999-07-31 Thread Steven Brooks
! :-) Even Central Park can be loud at times... Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc:(bcc: Steven Brooks/HOME_OFF/AGLIFE) Subject: Re: MD: AVLS (was: equipment advice, regarding the future) Someone wrote... Your perception of volume levels is subjective and is

Re: MD: AVLS (was: equipment advice, regarding the future)

1999-07-31 Thread salzberg
On 30 Jul 99, at 16:49, Steven Brooks wrote: > They will also tell you (and so can I) that while impatiently waiting for a > train, the platform, during 'regular' hours, is usually loud enough with 3 > million people talking, shouting, and other trains coming in that it is > hard enough to hear

Re: MD: AVLS (was: equipment advice, regarding the future)

1999-07-30 Thread Alexander Dietrich
>er... not to be a smart ass, but isn't that Dolby B/C NR is for? :-) On a Minidisc player ? Mine definitly doesn't have a Dolby switch. Alexander -- | Alexander Dietrich | Norderstedt, Germany | | e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | -

Re: MD: AVLS (was: equipment advice, regarding the future)

1999-07-30 Thread Steven Brooks
OFF/AGLIFE) Subject: Re: MD: AVLS (was: equipment advice, regarding the future) >Does anyone ever actually use AVLS? I've not ever seen the need or the >point of having a system that limits the volume - I can just about manage >that myself with the volume control, thankyaverymuch :)

Re: MD: AVLS (was: equipment advice, regarding the future)

1999-07-30 Thread Alexander Dietrich
>Does anyone ever actually use AVLS? I've not ever seen the need or the >point of having a system that limits the volume - I can just about manage >that myself with the volume control, thankyaverymuch :) Yeah, what I would like to see is an option to reduce hissing. On a portable that's a very

Re: MD: AVLS (was: equipment advice, regarding the future)

1999-07-30 Thread salzberg
On 30 Jul 99, at 19:53, Simon Gardner wrote: > Does anyone ever actually use AVLS? Yes. > I've not ever seen the need or the > point of having a system that limits the volume - I can just about manage > that myself with the volume control, thankyaverymuch :) Your perception of volume levels

MD: AVLS (was: equipment advice, regarding the future)

1999-07-30 Thread Simon Gardner
> Good things and bad things about the Sony brand -- they finally had the > good sense to implement this AVLS (Automatic Volume Limiting System) for > most of these who listen to their "Walkmans" > (CD/tape/MD/radio portables) way too loud. Then they got even smarter by > implementing an "On/Of