Re: MD: Anyone tried a G-Protection player?

2001-05-02 Thread Marc Britten
=== = NB: Over 50% of this message is QUOTED, please = = be more selective when quoting text = === from what i understood(and its fairly

Re: MD: Anyone tried a G-Protection player?

2001-05-02 Thread dattier
| from what i understood(and its fairly rudimentary) there is RAM in the | device which holds xseconds of sounds ... Well, yes, Marc, that's the read-ahead I was talking about. The impression I get of G-protection is that it's supposed to be a faster way of getting the head back into position

Re: MD: Anyone tried a G-Protection player?

2001-05-02 Thread -=d9=-
I have a Sony r900 and it has g-protection I think it is just something similar to anti shock minidisc disks - ie it prevents the lack of data due to vibrations - and so minimises the need to use the buffer - and so essentially makes the buffer seem larger. Put it this way - if I

Re: MD: Anyone tried a G-Protection player?

2001-05-01 Thread David W. Tamkin
| I suspect you're correct, but CD-portable's don't use a time buffer, do | they? They must, Richard. How else would they have data to keep playing smoothly while the head is repositioned from a dislodgment (or a ,,dislodgement'' in New Zealand)? There has to be some read-ahead, and there has

Re: MD: Anyone tried a G-Protection player?

2001-04-30 Thread Marc Britten
I just recently purchased a R700DPC, which has the G-Protection, my last sony portable is about 6 years old and I don't remember the model number(big square unit with a complete number pad on the front, heavy too) Because of the time difference (I hadn't used my old portable in about 3 years)

Re: MD: Anyone tried a G-Protection player?

2001-04-30 Thread Jeffrey Scorsone
This may be a dumb question, but is G-Protection anything additional to the units? I thought it was just a marketing name for the normal 40 second buffer. Can anyone verify? -Jeffrey - To stop getting this list send a message

Re: MD: Anyone tried a G-Protection player?

2001-04-30 Thread dattier
Richard Lang wrote, | It looks like Sony are using G-protection *instead* of | the time buffer, rather than as supplemental to the time buffer. Seems to me no form of shock protection can work without a time buffer. G-protection, per the blurb on Video Direct's site, seems to be an improved

RE: MD: Anyone tried a G-Protection player?

2001-04-30 Thread Francis Auquier
If this G-protection is a different system, then does it eliminate the noise made by the unit to fill-in the standard 40 sec buffer memory? This would be an improvement, really. Francis - To stop getting this list send a message

RE: MD: Anyone tried a G-Protection player?

2001-04-30 Thread Richard Lang
Seems to me no form of shock protection can work without a time buffer. G-protection, per the blurb on Video Direct's site, seems to be an improved way of recovering the head position from a dislodgment. I suspect you're correct, but CD-portable's don't use a time buffer, do they? The

RE: MD: Anyone tried a G-Protection player?

2001-04-29 Thread Richard Lang
I can't help with the comparison, Rick, but I'd also be interested in the answer to this one. It looks like Sony are using G-protection *instead* of the time buffer, rather than as supplemental to the time buffer. One other thing I don't quite get from that site - it looks like the (new?)