Mercata.com give $100 to any new customer with them...
This is not really a $100, it's 20% of the value of the products you want to
pay. So the max you can save is 20% of what you want to buy from them. Also,
how mercata works is really simple, it's a power buy ! More people buy, less
each
You say that the Sharp 722 has no editing functions? Is it a joke? You have a
button called EDIT or something like that. You access to DISC NAME, TRACK NAME,
COMBINE, DIVIDE, TRACK ERASE, ALL ERASE functions.
Moreover, on my Sharp 722, when I press
You didn't read very closely...what was said was that the 722 *remote*
didn't have many editing features. Whether or not that's true is beyond
me, as I only have the MT15.
On Tue, 15 Aug 2000, jeanmougin wrote:
You say that the Sharp 722 has no
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However, looking at the messages on this list, I can only conclude that
Sony portables have a good track-record. The Sharp units have also a good
track-record, and one should keep in mind that the 702 offered several
'advantages' over the MZ-R30 which had the
Someone wrote:
, and one should keep in mind that the 702 offered several
'advantages' over the MZ-R30 which had the same price, notable size and the
LiIon battery.
I had a Sharp 702 and a Sony R30. Bothe came with rechargable LiIon
battires. I got the Sharp because it was smaller than
i like the 722, did tons of recording the last 2 weeks--i would improve it
by having a backlit display for recording outdoors at night and also auto
mic levels
with an option to override and refine the levels of bass and treble. Also I
would like a remote with recording functions.
Susan
Please
susan wrote:
i like the 722,
Also I
would like a remote with recording functions.
The 722 remote does have some recording funtions.
Obviously, pause and stopand record
The track skip slider (where the play button is) adjusts the record level (not
that the remote is backlit so you
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
50% DOA rate? All of this seems more likely that the shipper you used
mishandled the units than anything else.
Where did you see DOA?? Most of these units lasted a few weeks. This had
nothing to do with shipping problems. This had to do with sh!t quality
* las [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 11 Aug 2000
| Where did you see DOA?? Most of these units lasted a few weeks.
You did not say that.
--
Rat [EMAIL PROTECTED]\ Happy Fun Ball may stick to certain types
Minion of Nathan - Nathan says Hi! \ of skin.
PGP Key: at a key server near you! \
Thus regarding my track-record with Sony audio gear, I would say that I
going to try to stay away from them
Ralph, my personal experience with Sony has been so bad that it makes yours look very
good!!!
If I remember correctly, the early Sharp 702s didn't have as many problems. I think
* las [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 11 Aug 2000
| Ralph, my personal experience with Sony has been so bad that it makes
| yours look very good!!!
So what you are saying is that Sharp is bad but Sony is worse? My own
experience with Sony equipment has been consistently below Sharp.
| The MZ30 was
So what you are saying is that Sharp is bad but Sony is worse? My own
experience with Sony equipment has been consistently below Sharp.
No. I'm saying that the 701/2 was bad. The rest of the Sharps seem to be fine.
Sharp MS-701 generation, actually. The MZ-R30 and the MS-701 were
* las [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 11 Aug 2000
| No. I'm saying that the 701/2 was bad. The rest of the Sharps seem to
| be fine.
Bad compared to what?
I own a 702 and a 722, no problems. Friends of mine own 701s, 702s and
722s, no problems. I have yet to actually see a 701, 702 or 722 fail.
For the most part I love my 722, though it is
somewhat fragile, physically. Esp the eject
lever and mechanism. I've had it since Dec
and never see a UOTC error.
The irony here is that most people consider the Sharp
700-series to be among the sturdiest, least fragile
designs out there,
The irony here is that most people consider the Sharp
700-series to be among the sturdiest, least fragile
designs out there, *especially* the eject lever and
mechanism ;-)
The Sharp 702 was probably the most unreliable portable mini disc
recorder ever made. When I was helping sell MD
The irony here is that most people consider the Sharp
700-series to be among the sturdiest, least fragile
designs out there, *especially* the eject lever and
mechanism ;-)
Oh I wanted to add, the disappoint with the 702 was particularly
unexpected because we had such excellent reliability
* las [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu, 10 Aug 2000
| The Sharp 702 was probably the most unreliable portable mini disc
| recorder ever made. When I was helping sell MD gear on the net the
| return rate was as high as fifty 50%!
50% DOA rate? All of this seems more likely that the shipper you used
50% DOA rate? All of this seems more likely that the shipper you used
mishandled the units than anything else.
Where did you see DOA?? Most of these units lasted a few weeks. This had
nothing to do with shipping problems. This had to do with sh!t quality control
on the part of Sharp.
I have two friends who want to buy Sharp MS-722... I used to sell them
before but since I don't have any in stock, I was wondering where is the
best place to buy this unit on internet...
If you could give me the best spots to buy this unit, my friends will really
appreciate this...
Best
===
= NB: Over 50% of this message is QUOTED, please =
= be more selective when quoting text =
===
I got mine last week from
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of Mike Burger
Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2000 12:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: MD: Sharp MS-722
On a related note, I have a friend who wants to buy one, as well.
However, he read some reviews that seemed to note that the 722
* Mike Burger [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 09 Aug 2000
| On a related note, I have a friend who wants to buy one, as well.
| However, he read some reviews that seemed to note that the 722 frequently
| winds up giving UTOC errors.
| Can anyone confirm or deny this as a common phenomenon?
Denied.
I got a MS722 for $133 from www.mercata.com (after a
20% discount for signing up). It wouldn't record and
generated UTOC errors right out of the box. They sent
me a new one and I sent the old one back. The new one
works fine and for $133 was quite a deal.
Seth
]]On
Behalf Of Mike Burger
Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2000 12:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: MD: Sharp MS-722
On a related note, I have a friend who wants to buy one, as well.
However, he read some reviews that seemed to note that the 722 frequently
winds up giving UTOC errors.
Can
24 matches
Mail list logo
