Re: MD: sharp MD-X5 and MS-702

2001-04-13 Thread Eric Woudenberg, Minidisc.org Editor
Hi Eli, ive got the MD-X5 minisystem, and the MS-702 player/recorder. the only problem is whenever i play MDs that i made on the X5 on the 702, i get horrible static, so loud that its unbearable, and not listen-able. i would guess that its an ATRAC incompatibility, but that doesnt make

Re: MD: sharp MD-X5 and MS-702

2001-04-13 Thread Stuart Howlette
Thursday, April 12, 2001 1:45 AM Subject: Re: MD: sharp MD-X5 and MS-702 * "Stuart Howlette" [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 11 Apr 2001 | My guess is (possibly incorrect, but anyway) is that the atrac chip in the | x5 is an earlier version of the 702's, meaning its poorer in compres

Re: MD: sharp MD-X5 and MS-702

2001-04-13 Thread Dan Frakes
"Stuart Howlette" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My guess is (possibly incorrect, but anyway) is that the atrac chip in the x5 is an earlier version of the 702's, meaning its poorer in compression, meaning poorer in storing music. Also, the X5's sound could've have been counter balanced with other

MD: sharp MD-X5 and MS-702

2001-04-11 Thread me
hi all, ive got the MD-X5 minisystem, and the MS-702 player/recorder. the only problem is whenever i play MDs that i made on the X5 on the 702, i get horrible static, so loud that its unbearable, and not listen-able. i would guess that its an ATRAC incompatibility, but that doesnt make sense -

Re: MD: sharp MD-X5 and MS-702

2001-04-11 Thread Robert J. Lynn Jr.
: sharp MD-X5 and MS-702 hi all, ive got the MD-X5 minisystem, and the MS-702 player/recorder. the only problem is whenever i play MDs that i made on the X5 on the 702, i get horrible static, so loud that its unbearable, and not listen-able. i would guess that its an ATRAC incom

Re: MD: sharp MD-X5 and MS-702

2001-04-11 Thread Stuart Howlette
This email was delivered to you by The Free Internet, a Business Online Group company. http://www.thefreeinternet.net --- i would guess that its an ATRAC incompatibility, but that doesnt make sense - the X5 is older than the 702 (at

Re: MD: sharp MD-X5 and MS-702

2001-04-11 Thread Stainless Steel Rat
* "Stuart Howlette" [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 11 Apr 2001 | My guess is (possibly incorrect, but anyway) is that the atrac chip in the | x5 is an earlier version of the 702's, meaning its poorer in compression, | meaning poorer in storing music. No. There are no interoperability issues

Re: MD: sharp MD-X5 and MS-702

2001-04-11 Thread J. Coon
I agree with Rat on this. Get a MD recorded on another unit, or a pre-recoprded one and see which one is messed up. Stainless Steel Rat wrote: * "Stuart Howlette" [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 11 Apr 2001 | My guess is (possibly incorrect, but anyway) is that the atrac chip in the | x5 is

Re: MD: sharp MD-X5 and MS-702

2001-04-11 Thread Dan Irwin
I've got a Sharp MD-X5 and an MS-722 player/recorder. I do not notice this problem at all going in either direction. I guess the question I have to ask here is what type of recording were you making on the X5? Digital? Analog? What was your source? If it was external to the X5, did you