Re: MD: MO technology and MD data usage

1999-11-29 Thread Remko van der Vossen
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Due to a high error ratio of a minidisc (which isn't a problem for audio) > > it is not as suitable for data as you'd think, which leads to a lot of > > redundancy, ie the disk will probably be much less than 140 Mb, more like > > 100-120 > >Huh??? > >1) MD-Data ==

Re: MD: MO technology and MD data usage

1999-11-29 Thread Ralph Smeets
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Due to a high error ratio of a minidisc (which isn't a problem for audio) > it is not as suitable for data as you'd think, which leads to a lot of > redundancy, ie the disk will probably be much less than 140 Mb, more like > 100-120 Huh??? 1) MD-Data == 140MB. 2) MD

Re: MD: MO technology and MD data usage

1999-11-29 Thread Ralph Smeets
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I would question your first point... ;) > > Agree that write speed would be less than read speed; however if you > consider that a MD recorder can accept a streaming digital input of CD > quality audio (via the optical in), encode it with ATRAC, AND write it to > t

RE: MD: MO technology and MD data usage

1999-11-27 Thread Rick Pali
From: Magic > I think I would rather boot my OS from something > that looked like a brick than a "Hello Kitty" > anything! Damned straight. I got a semi-random selection of blanks mailed to me from a friend living in Japan for a few years. I was certain that they'd send a 'Hello-Kitty' disc in

Re: MD: MO technology and MD data usage

1999-11-27 Thread Magic
From: Hannes Rohde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, November 27, 1999 1:33 PM Subject: Re: MD: MO technology and MD data usage Hannes made the comment: > After all, minidiscs look far better than zip discs! I agree Hannes then trashed his o

Re: MD: MO technology and MD data usage

1999-11-27 Thread Hannes Rohde
Remko van der Vossen wrote: > >if you consider that a MD recorder can accept a streaming > >digital input of CD quality audio (via the optical in), encode > >it with ATRAC, AND write it to the disk, all in real-time - > >then i think you'll find the bandwidth of the system quite > >sufficient fo

RE: MD: MO technology and MD data usage

1999-11-27 Thread Remko van der Vossen
At 07:33 PM 11/26/99 -0500, you wrote: >I would question your first point... ;) > >Agree that write speed would be less than read speed; however if you >consider that a MD recorder can accept a streaming digital input of CD >quality audio (via the optical in), encode it with ATRAC, AND write it

RE: MD: MO technology and MD data usage

1999-11-26 Thread Mark I. Ross
have been obseleted years ago... IMO anyways ;) L8r, mark... -Original Message- Subject: Re: MD: MO technology and MD data usage The write speed is probably the biggest problem (ie I would think the read speed would be less of a factor) - there is a finite time taken to heat the met

Re: MD: MO technology and MD data usage

1999-11-25 Thread Graham Baker
I think there are a couple of reasons for this: The write speed is probably the biggest problem (ie I would think the read speed would be less of a factor) - there is a finite time taken to heat the metallic substrate to it's Curie Point and also a finite time from that point for the write magne