Re: MD: MZ-R30 vs. MZ-R37 vs. MD MS-702 vs. MZ-R90, et. al.

2000-05-09 Thread J. Coon
Stainless Steel Rat wrote: > R30: A good recorder for digital input, but setting record levels for line > or mic input is a pain, and they do not keep between discs so you have to > reset them. I normally just use the automatic setting and set the mike level to either high or low sensitivity and

RE: MD: MZ-R30 vs. MZ-R37 vs. MD MS-702 vs. MZ-R90, et. al.

2000-05-09 Thread WZ
> Remotes: I don't use them. Too many wires to get tangled in whatever. > That said, the R30 has the simplest, most straight-forward remote of the > bunch. Does the R30 have the same remote as the R50 ? I find that i really like the R50 remote. I am using this in my car, and I can grab the re

RE: MD: MZ-R30 vs. MZ-R37 vs. MD MS-702 vs. MZ-R90, et. al.

2000-05-09 Thread Alan Dowds
>-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On >Behalf Of Stainless Steel Rat >Sent: 09 May 2000 02:42 >To: MD-L >Subject: MD: MZ-R30 vs. MZ-R37 vs. MD MS-702 vs. MZ-R90, et. al. > > >702: The FF/FR buttons really need to be given some separation, and the >volum

Re: MD: MZ-R30 vs. MZ-R37 vs. MD MS-702 vs. MZ-R90, et. al.

2000-05-08 Thread gopi
On 8 May 2000, Stainless Steel Rat wrote: > Sony vs. Sharp: End Search ('nuff said). When shifting character sets > (upper, lower, special), the R90 resets the letter to "A" each cycle; 702 > is smart enough to remember that "n" and "N" are the same letter. Weird. I have an MZ-R50, and it does