At 03:58 PM 2/5/01 -0800, you wrote:
>Some people regard the R50 as the "absolute norm" - some kind of ideal form
>for an MD portable. My guess is that after the R50, MD portables generally
>became caught up in a somewhat pathetic quest for better stastical
>performance (low power consumption,
Some people regard the R50 as the "absolute norm" - some kind of ideal form
for an MD portable. My guess is that after the R50, MD portables generally
became caught up in a somewhat pathetic quest for better stastical
performance (low power consumption, for example).
I don't know what the R50's
At 2/4/01 3:15 PM, John Small wrote:
>
>Since both are available (R50 at $250, R90 at $220) is there one reason to
>prefer one model over the other? Beyond the R90 issue is there some
>reason to
>prefer the R900 over either the R50 or R90, aside from the LP feature? These
>are the only three
