That would work too. The ear buds were pretty cheap, and the cable was
already split and labeled as to which is the right and which is the
left. A lot of people that want to build one don't have anything to
test the cable with.
JT wrote:
On Tue, 9 Jan 2001, J. Coon wrote:
Using the
For serious listening or recording maybe, but when I bought my md player
(sharp mt77) I wanted something that could fill the role of a portable mp3
player but have the benifits of a tape/cd portable(like not having to spend
an arm and a leg on additional storage) without being as bulky. There
"Churchill, Guy" wrote:
If you can't ever hear tell the difference, does it matter? I
I submit that it does matter, for the reasons I mentioned in my previous
post that future technology will enable the ability to vastly improve
current recordings. It's like the Caruso restorations. They
Steve Corey wrote:
In the majority of cases, I cannot tell the difference between CD and
the ATRAC on my MZ-R90. However, I did a recording with it of some
acoustic guitar, where I didn't set the levels properly, and I can hear
a difference between the ATRAC and the DAT version. (I used
At 1/8/01 11:28 PM, J. Coon wrote:
No, I haven't listened to it at all. It is just that when I record
something, I want it to be very close the original. MD is very close
to CD quality. However, from the reports of people that have posted
their experiance to the list, they can tell a
On Tue, 9 Jan 2001 01:08:32 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IMNSHO, units without LP are history.
In what way?
I can sorta see that new units may struggle to compete without these
features. But as you've alluded to, yourself - I suspect many MD users may
never use it.
For normal musics MDs
Ed Heckman wrote:
I was one of those people that posted my opinion of LP. I did a short
comparison test between the LP and regular modes. I could hear a
difference between standard mode and LP2. But I had to listen for it.
This difference will probably not be apparent under normal listing
[snip]
Where I can truly see a use, is for lecture / seminar recording, or
personally for recording audio books.
Agreed. As a student myself, I have toyed with the idea of recording
lectures on my Sharp MT-831. Though it's not LP by any measure, I can still
assure quite a bit of
First off, I absolutely love my MZ-R90. Now onto rant mode:
"J. Coon" wrote:
No, I haven't listened to it at all. It is just that when I record
Sounds like one of those "infidels look down on MD as inferior because
it uses ATRAC" as you put it in another post. You're doing the same
Will asked, tersely,
| does LP sound good? thats what i want to know.
I have to agree with Ed Heckman here; to my ears, LP2 is good enough for en-
joying most music, and LP4 is plenty good enough for speech. Also, sometimes
I'll record music from the radio while I'm busy or asleep and not
First off, I absolutely love my MZ-R90. Now onto rant mode:
I think everyone here "loves" their MD gear. (sometimes just
a little tooo much :)
I do play music, and I am looking for super long recordings.
If I want quality recording I go DAT. Don't kid yourself, MD
is lossy
Using the earphones works in a pinch but you are better off making or
buying a condenser mike. Here is one that I designed that work well,
and the parts cost about $10.
http://www.tir.com/~liteways/Mandolin.html#Microphone
Anthony Lalande wrote:
On the other hand, a friend of mine has
Leon:
Thanks for the info/translation! Exactly what I was looking for.
-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
does LP sound good? thats what i want to know. Cuz i just go tthe sony
MZ-R90. .
-WiLL
-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
But the MZ-R90 doesn't suppport LP...
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 08, 2001 6:16 PM
Subject: Re: MD: Sony E500 vs. E700 vs. E900
does LP sound good? thats what i want to know. Cuz i just go tthe sony
MZ-R90
i know, i wanted to know if LP sounds as good as regular recording
-
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I guess it would sound good if you always listened to it in heavy
traffic riding on the bus. I think for serious listening or recording,
you are better off with standard MD.
Some infidels look down on MD as inferior because it uses ATRAC in the
first place, can you imagine their comments on
"J. Coon" wrote:
I have recorded on my R30 and got a copy that was good enough to submit
for a CD compilation, and so have a lot of other people. I'm sure they
won't be able to do that with the LP mode.
Jim are you saying that based on actual double blind listening studies that
you
After 25 years or so of having a highspeed drill blast my ears, I no
longer
consider myself qualified to judge.
Well Larry, if you can't judge yourself, why not get more recording time?
People are so worried about what others think of their own idea of fidelity.
If you think LP4 sounds great,
No, I haven't listened to it at all. It is just that when I record
something, I want it to be very close the original. MD is very close
to CD quality. However, from the reports of people that have posted
their experiance to the list, they can tell a difference between
standard MD and LP
A summary from Sony's own comparison table in Japanese:
(http://www.walkman.sony.co.jp/prod/md_rec/kino.html)
All 3 are compatible with MDLP.
The E700 is functionally identical to the E900, but doesn't have magnesium
alloy casing.
weight - unit only / unit with rech. battery
E500 - 76g / 101g
21 matches
Mail list logo
