Re: [MeeGo-dev] Packaging the MeeGo stack on Debian - Use the name ?

2010-12-14 Thread Riku Voipio
On 12/13/2010 01:30 AM, ext David Greaves wrote: Can I ask how this applies to the 50+ packages which are currently part of meego but which are opensource and many of which we presumably expect to be used elsewhere? eg: libmeegochat libmeegotouch maemo-meegotouch-interfaces (!) meego-handset-*

[MeeGo-dev] Using meego or similar in packages and distro names

2010-12-14 Thread quim.gil
Hi, let's see if we can move into specific details to find and fix whatever is problematic in this discussion about using anything close to meego in packages and distro names. About using meego or something similar to name a distro using MeeGo related components, the opinion of The Linux

Re: [MeeGo-dev] Using meego or similar in packages and distro names

2010-12-14 Thread Gabriel M. Beddingfield
On Tue, 14 Dec 2010, quim@nokia.com wrote: About package names, since they are open source (LGPL, Apache...) there shouldn't be any problems redistributing them with the same name, isn't it. If there is a problem with the name or license of a specific package please let's file a bug

Re: [MeeGo-dev] Using meego or similar in packages and distro names

2010-12-14 Thread Arjan van de Ven
On 12/14/2010 7:57 AM, quim@nokia.com wrote: Hi, let's see if we can move into specific details to find and fix whatever is problematic in this discussion about using anything close to meego in packages and distro names. Can that discussion *PLEASE* move away from the development list

[MeeGo-dev] MeeGo migration path?

2010-12-14 Thread Jechlitschek, Christoph
Hi all, I was wondering if there exists a migration path from MeeGo 1.0 to MeeGo 1.1 and later to MeeGo 1.2. This is very interesting for companies that have devices in the field and want to push an upgrade to the next higher version (instead of just an update within a version). Is it just a

Re: [MeeGo-dev] Using meego or similar in packages and distro names

2010-12-14 Thread Randall Arnold
- Original message - From: quim@nokia.com To: meego-dev@meego.com Subject: [MeeGo-dev] Using meego or similar in packages and distro names Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 15:57:01 + � Progress in this discussion is measured in improvements to the current documentation and bugs

Re: [MeeGo-dev] Using meego or similar in packages and distro names

2010-12-14 Thread Julian Andres Klode
On Di, 2010-12-14 at 08:35 -0800, Arjan van de Ven wrote: On 12/14/2010 7:57 AM, quim@nokia.com wrote: Hi, let's see if we can move into specific details to find and fix whatever is problematic in this discussion about using anything close to meego in packages and distro names.

Re: [MeeGo-dev] Using meego or similar in packages and distro names

2010-12-14 Thread Arjan van de Ven
On 12/14/2010 8:47 AM, Julian Andres Klode wrote: On Di, 2010-12-14 at 08:35 -0800, Arjan van de Ven wrote: On 12/14/2010 7:57 AM, quim@nokia.com wrote: Hi, let's see if we can move into specific details to find and fix whatever is problematic in this discussion about using anything close

[MeeGo-dev] Application Icon not visible in Application list : MeeGo 1.1

2010-12-14 Thread Nanjundiah.Harsha
Hello, Deployed an application in MeeGo 1.1 but it doesnot show up in list of applications installed. However I can lanuch the app from terminal. Here is application packaging information: /usr/bin/application binary /usr/share/applications/hildon/application.desktop

Re: [MeeGo-dev] MeeGo migration path?

2010-12-14 Thread Thiago Macieira
Em Terça-feira, 14 de Dezembro de 2010, às 16:45:28, Jechlitschek, Christoph escreveu: Hi all, I was wondering if there exists a migration path from MeeGo 1.0 to MeeGo 1.1 and later to MeeGo 1.2. This is very interesting for companies that have devices in the field and want to push an upgrade

Re: [MeeGo-dev] MeeGo migration path?

2010-12-14 Thread Foster, Dawn M
On Dec 14, 2010, at 8:45 AM, Jechlitschek, Christoph wrote: Hi all, I was wondering if there exists a migration path from MeeGo 1.0 to MeeGo 1.1 and later to MeeGo 1.2. This is very interesting for companies that have devices in the field and want to push an upgrade to the next higher

Re: [MeeGo-dev] Application Icon not visible in Application list : MeeGo 1.1

2010-12-14 Thread Dave Neary
Hi, nanjundiah.har...@elektrobit.com wrote: Deployed an application in MeeGo 1.1 but it doesnot show up in list of applications installed. However I can lanuch the app from terminal. This implies that the .desktop file is not being parsed by the desktop, or it is missing some crucial

[MeeGo-dev] Comments on proposed kernel policy

2010-12-14 Thread Carsten Munk
Hi, Just noticed that http://wiki.meego.com/Core_OS_Program/Kernel_policy came up and is on the agenda for TSG meeting tomorrow, so given that we have 24 hours to comment and I haven't seen it discussed in public, here's a couple of questions/comments from a hardware adaptation PoV (not speaking

Re: [MeeGo-dev] Comments on proposed kernel policy

2010-12-14 Thread Arjan van de Ven
On 12/14/2010 1:45 PM, Carsten Munk wrote: Hi, Just noticed that http://wiki.meego.com/Core_OS_Program/Kernel_policy came up and is on the agenda for TSG meeting tomorrow, so given that we have 24 hours to comment and I haven't seen it discussed in public, here's a couple of questions/comments

Re: [MeeGo-dev] Comments on proposed kernel policy

2010-12-14 Thread Arjan van de Ven
On 12/14/2010 2:38 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote: Carsten Munk had written, on 12/14/2010 03:45 PM, the following: btw, I think this discussion is better on meego-kernel ML. Just noticed that http://wiki.meego.com/Core_OS_Program/Kernel_policy Overall, meaning of upstream is confusing to me at

Re: [MeeGo-dev] Comments on proposed kernel policy

2010-12-14 Thread Nishanth Menon
Arjan van de Ven had written, on 12/14/2010 04:55 PM, the following: [...] 1. MeeGo will ship with one 'reference kernel', that will have one shared codebase between all the devices it supports (with different configuration files). This kernel will be close to the upstream kernel with very few

Re: [MeeGo-dev] Comments on proposed kernel policy

2010-12-14 Thread Arjan van de Ven
On 12/14/2010 3:10 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote: Arjan van de Ven had written, on 12/14/2010 04:55 PM, the following: [...] 1. MeeGo will ship with one 'reference kernel', that will have one shared codebase between all the devices it supports (with different configuration files). This kernel will

Re: [MeeGo-dev] Comments on proposed kernel policy

2010-12-14 Thread Nishanth Menon
Arjan van de Ven had written, on 12/14/2010 05:14 PM, the following: On 12/14/2010 3:10 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote: Arjan van de Ven had written, on 12/14/2010 04:55 PM, the following: [...] 1. MeeGo will ship with one 'reference kernel', that will have one shared codebase between all the

Re: [MeeGo-dev] Comments on proposed kernel policy

2010-12-14 Thread Arjan van de Ven
On 12/14/2010 3:34 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote: a relatively current release will be chosen yes. Now last formal is a hard term; since 2.6.38 likely will be out before 1.2 ships, 2.6.37 is clearly not the last formal release at the time of ship. (but 2.6.38 will be out very shortly before 1.2

[MeeGo-dev] Fwd: [MeeGo-touch-dev] Target specification in meegotouch reference UX gconf

2010-12-14 Thread Eugene Seah
Since this goes into some gconf setting in meego... trying meego-dev as well, does anyone know how the target device profile gets specified post 1.1? Thanks. === Hi all, On MeeGo 1.1, we used to modify the gconf setting of /meegotouch/theme/target to point

[MeeGo-dev] how to make meego installer support ext3 , ext4 as a root file system ?

2010-12-14 Thread pingwei.wu
 hi, all guys, when installing , there are only five fs --- btrfs, ext2, ext3, vfat , nfs-- to select, and if you choose ext3 or other type to / , there will be a warning to tell you , the rootfs can only be btrfs; however, I need ext4 to be supported and more, I want to format root

[MeeGo-dev] compass sensor plugin

2010-12-14 Thread Jia-Chi Lai
hi~~ Sensorfw can not load the compass sensor plugins. And I find a README file in sensorfw , include a information about the problem. When does the compass sensor plugins would built in the sensorfw package?? Thanks. ___ MeeGo-dev mailing list

Re: [MeeGo-dev] Comments on proposed kernel policy

2010-12-14 Thread Thomas B. Ruecker
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 03:14:06PM -0800, Arjan van de Ven wrote: On 12/14/2010 3:10 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote: Arjan van de Ven had written, on 12/14/2010 04:55 PM, the following: [...] 1. MeeGo will ship with one 'reference kernel', that will have one shared codebase between all the

Re: [MeeGo-dev] Application Icon not visible in Application list : MeeGo 1.1

2010-12-14 Thread Nanjundiah.Harsha
Hi, nanjundiah.har...@elektrobit.com wrote: Deployed an application in MeeGo 1.1 but it doesnot show up in list of applications installed. However I can lanuch the app from terminal. This implies that the .desktop file is not being parsed by the desktop, or it is missing some crucial

Re: [MeeGo-dev] Application Icon not visible in Application list : MeeGo 1.1

2010-12-14 Thread Timo Härkönen
On Tue, 2010-12-14 at 23:37 +0200, Dave Neary wrote: Hi, nanjundiah.har...@elektrobit.com wrote: Deployed an application in MeeGo 1.1 but it doesnot show up in list of applications installed. However I can lanuch the app from terminal. This implies that the .desktop file is not