Re: [MeeGo-dev] [Meego-architecture] Some architecture changes (MSSF / Buteo / PIM storage)

2011-03-07 Thread Carsten Munk
2011/3/7 Arjan van de Ven : > Hi, > > given the events of the last few weeks, the MeeGo architects have, and still > are, revisiting various parts of the MeeGo architecture. Just to ask so it's clear (I'm sure that there are people that are wondering), the architects are still you, Sunil Saxena fr

Re: [MeeGo-dev] [Meego-architecture] Some architecture changes (MSSF / Buteo / PIM storage)

2011-03-07 Thread Arjan van de Ven
On 3/7/2011 8:51 AM, Carsten Munk wrote:In the long-term, we will re-evaluate the direction we are taking with MeeGo security with a new focus on *End-User Privacy*. While we do not intend to immediately remove the security enabling technologies we have been including in MeeGo, all security techn

Re: [MeeGo-dev] [Meego-architecture] Some architecture changes (MSSF / Buteo / PIM storage)

2011-03-07 Thread George Ingram
Thanks for the update... How far away from the Qt & or Java Cryptographic Architecture API's are you? Regards, George Ingram -Original Message- From: meego-architecture-boun...@lists.meego.com [mailto:meego-architecture-boun...@lists.meego.com] On Behalf Of Arjan van de Ven Sent: Monday, M

Re: [MeeGo-dev] [Meego-architecture] Some architecture changes (MSSF / Buteo / PIM storage)

2011-03-07 Thread Sateesh Babu
Hi, > Buteo Sync > == > The Buteo Sync framework in MeeGo is currently very incomplete; various > promised and needed components never materialized, and > are unlikely to materialize in the future. On the Intel side, we've found > that we ended up glueing SyncEvolution into Buteo on a regu

Re: [MeeGo-dev] [Meego-architecture] Some architecture changes (MSSF / Buteo / PIM storage)

2011-03-07 Thread Marius Vollmer
ext Arjan van de Ven writes: > (we're seeing quite some crashes, which worries me from a security > pov) In my experience, these crashes happen mostly in the various extractor modules, which try to parse as many obscure file formats as possible, sometimes with quationable code. This task is don

Re: [MeeGo-dev] [Meego-architecture] Some architecture changes (MSSF / Buteo / PIM storage)

2011-03-08 Thread Martyn Russell
On 08/03/11 06:32, Marius Vollmer wrote: ext Arjan van de Ven writes: (we're seeing quite some crashes, which worries me from a security pov) In my experience, these crashes happen mostly in the various extractor modules, which try to parse as many obscure file formats as possible, sometimes

Re: [MeeGo-dev] [Meego-architecture] Some architecture changes (MSSF / Buteo / PIM storage)

2011-03-08 Thread Carsten Munk
2011/3/8 Martyn Russell : > Presumably you're not still using version 0.7 of Tracker? > > Tracker 0.10.x improves start up time for miner-fs DRAMATICALLY because we > don't re-check all parent directories on start up, instead we only set up > monitors (which takes seconds for thousands of directori

Re: [MeeGo-dev] [Meego-architecture] Some architecture changes (MSSF / Buteo / PIM storage)

2011-03-08 Thread mikhail.zabaluev
Hi, > -Original Message- > From: meego-architecture-boun...@lists.meego.com [mailto:meego- > architecture-boun...@lists.meego.com] On Behalf Of ext Michael Meeks > Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2011 11:24 AM > To: Mathias Hasselmann > Cc: meego-dev@meego.com; meego-architect...@meego.com; Arjan

Re: [MeeGo-dev] [Meego-architecture] Some architecture changes (MSSF / Buteo / PIM storage)

2011-03-08 Thread Martyn Russell
On 08/03/11 09:43, Carsten Munk wrote: 2011/3/8 Martyn Russell: Presumably you're not still using version 0.7 of Tracker? Tracker 0.10.x improves start up time for miner-fs DRAMATICALLY because we don't re-check all parent directories on start up, instead we only set up monitors (which takes se

Re: [MeeGo-dev] [Meego-architecture] Some architecture changes (MSSF / Buteo / PIM storage)

2011-03-08 Thread Carsten Munk
2011/3/8 Martyn Russell : > On 08/03/11 09:43, Carsten Munk wrote: >> >> 2011/3/8 Martyn Russell: >>> >>> Presumably you're not still using version 0.7 of Tracker? >>> >>> Tracker 0.10.x improves start up time for miner-fs DRAMATICALLY because >>> we >>> don't re-check all parent directories on sta

Re: [MeeGo-dev] [Meego-architecture] Some architecture changes (MSSF / Buteo / PIM storage)

2011-03-08 Thread Mathias Hasselmann
Am Dienstag, den 08.03.2011, 12:41 +0200 schrieb Vitaly Repin: > > you seem to be proud of 80 seconds for 500 people I would absolutely > > not be proud about such > > a abysmal number. > > Completely agree. The contacts sync speed should be increased. Yes, it's still far from optimal. Still

Re: [MeeGo-dev] [Meego-architecture] Some architecture changes (MSSF / Buteo / PIM storage)

2011-03-08 Thread Philip Van Hoof
On Tue, 2011-03-08 at 11:56 +0100, Mathias Hasselmann wrote: > Am Dienstag, den 08.03.2011, 12:41 +0200 schrieb Vitaly Repin: > > > you seem to be proud of 80 seconds for 500 people I would absolutely > > > not be proud about such > > > a abysmal number. > > > > Completely agree. The contacts

Re: [MeeGo-dev] [Meego-architecture] Some architecture changes (MSSF / Buteo / PIM storage)

2011-03-08 Thread Patrick Ohly
On Di, 2011-03-08 at 05:14 +, Sateesh Babu wrote: > > SyncEvolution is an existing mature open source project with a history of > > functionality and compatibility, and we're confident that > > the switch to this project will benefit Sync in MeeGo for years to come. > > > > The complete MTP st

Re: [MeeGo-dev] [Meego-architecture] Some architecture changes (MSSF / Buteo / PIM storage)

2011-03-08 Thread Arjan van de Ven
On 3/8/2011 1:39 AM, Martyn Russell wrote: On 08/03/11 06:32, Marius Vollmer wrote: ext Arjan van de Ven writes: (we're seeing quite some crashes, which worries me from a security pov) In my experience, these crashes happen mostly in the various extractor modules, which try to parse as many

Re: [MeeGo-dev] [Meego-architecture] Some architecture changes (MSSF / Buteo / PIM storage)

2011-03-08 Thread Sateesh Babu
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 6:25 PM, Patrick Ohly wrote: > On Di, 2011-03-08 at 05:14 +, Sateesh Babu wrote: >> > SyncEvolution is an existing mature open source project with a history of >> > functionality and compatibility, and we're confident that >> > the switch to this project will benefit Syn

Re: [MeeGo-dev] [Meego-architecture] Some architecture changes (MSSF / Buteo / PIM storage)

2011-03-08 Thread Ryan Ware
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 8:35 AM, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > On 3/8/2011 1:39 AM, Martyn Russell wrote: > >> On 08/03/11 06:32, Marius Vollmer wrote: >> >>> ext Arjan van de Ven writes: >>> >>> (we're seeing quite some crashes, which worries me from a security pov) >>> >>> In my experienc

Re: [MeeGo-dev] [Meego-architecture] Some architecture changes (MSSF / Buteo / PIM storage)

2011-03-08 Thread Philip Van Hoof
On Tue, 2011-03-08 at 09:03 -0800, Ryan Ware wrote: Hi Ryan, > kinda scary... we need to pay close attention to these. > > We need to pay extremely close attention to these. These types of > failures are indicative of buffer handling errors. If we aren't > handling these buffers correctly (f

Re: [MeeGo-dev] [Meego-architecture] Some architecture changes (MSSF / Buteo / PIM storage)

2011-03-09 Thread Sivan Greenberg
Arjan, I would like to say thank you for this. This is I hope a first move towards coherent and assertive coomunication I'd like to see more out of this project. I am not an security expert but I from my research and some personal contact with Patrick support this with a big thumbs up. I was part

Re: [MeeGo-dev] [Meego-architecture] Some architecture changes (MSSF / Buteo / PIM storage)

2011-03-10 Thread Martyn Russell
On 08/03/11 09:57, Carsten Munk wrote: 2011/3/8 Martyn Russell: Current version in Trunk is tracker-0.9.34 + patches The feature was first added in 0.9.37. What patches do you have? Can they be back-folded into upstream? Feel free to browse through http://build.meego.com/package/files?packa