Re: [MeeGo-dev] Projected timelines for full openness

2010-04-29 Thread Quim Gil
ext Glen Gray wrote: On 27 Apr 2010, at 10:16, Quim Gil wrote: The plan is to have in few weeks a first complete MeeGo release followed by a roadmap to work on the next release. Once this is out the MeeGo project shouldn't have any obstacle to have all the daily work and routines in the

Re: [MeeGo-dev] Projected timelines for full openness

2010-04-28 Thread Quim Gil
Hi, ext Graham Cobb wrote: On Tuesday 27 April 2010 10:16:07 Quim Gil wrote: The plan is to have in few weeks a first complete MeeGo release followed by a roadmap to work on the next release. Once this is out the MeeGo project shouldn't have any obstacle to have all the daily work and

Re: [MeeGo-dev] Projected timelines for full openness

2010-04-28 Thread Quim Gil
Forgot another important aspect. See below. :) Gil Quim (Nokia-D/Helsinki) wrote: Hi, ext Graham Cobb wrote: On Tuesday 27 April 2010 10:16:07 Quim Gil wrote: The plan is to have in few weeks a first complete MeeGo release followed by a roadmap to work on the next release. Once this is out

Re: [MeeGo-dev] Projected timelines for full openness

2010-04-27 Thread Quim Gil
Hi, ext Glen Gray wrote: By openness I mean code available, for me to download, compile and work on. Some code was released for Day 1 as regards the base operating system but the project is still largely being designed and developed behind closed doors. The plan is for this to move to an

Re: [MeeGo-dev] Projected timelines for full openness

2010-04-22 Thread Glen Gray
On 22 Apr 2010, at 00:26, ronan.maclave...@nokia.com ronan.maclave...@nokia.com wrote: I am not sure exactly what you are after, but the plan is for Meego to have a 6month release cycle, so May-November-May. We can probably expect some variations from this cycle, but every 6months is the

Re: [MeeGo-dev] Projected timelines for full openness

2010-04-22 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
On 22/04/2010 06:05, An Yang wrote: Meego is a project hosted by the Linux Foundation, and while companies can use it to make projects, it is not a company. The goal of the Meego project is to make an open project, and to make use of open technologies (like gstreamer) where people can

Re: [MeeGo-dev] Projected timelines for full openness

2010-04-22 Thread Robin Burchell
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 11:58 PM, Glen Gray sla...@slaine.org wrote: To follow up on the topic of openness and transparency from the TSG meeting earlier today, I'd like to ask for some details and timelines for when this is planned to be achieved. [ignoring the detour into LTS to keep things

Re: [MeeGo-dev] Projected timelines for full openness

2010-04-22 Thread Dave Neary
Hi, Glen Gray wrote: You're confusing a product release with openness. By openness I mean code available, for me to download, compile and work on. Some code was released for Day 1 as regards the base operating system but the project is still largely being designed and developed behind closed

[MeeGo-dev] Projected timelines for full openness

2010-04-21 Thread Glen Gray
To follow up on the topic of openness and transparency from the TSG meeting earlier today, I'd like to ask for some details and timelines for when this is planned to be achieved. MeeGo 1.0 is only a matter of weeks away. The time for the community having any useful design impact on this

Re: [MeeGo-dev] Projected timelines for full openness

2010-04-21 Thread ronan.maclaverty
To follow up on the topic of openness and transparency from the TSG meeting earlier today, I'd like to ask for some details and timelines for when this is planned to be achieved. MeeGo 1.0 is only a matter of weeks away. The time for the community having any useful design impact on this

Re: [MeeGo-dev] Projected timelines for full openness

2010-04-21 Thread An Yang
Hi Ronan, I have tow questions: Meego 1.0 is a company works in a close develop env, will it be opened in the future? open should means not only open the source code and rpm packages, but the develop process. About 6 month release cycle, will meego release a TLS edtion? 在 2010-04-22四的 01:26

Re: [MeeGo-dev] Projected timelines for full openness

2010-04-21 Thread Robinson Tryon
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 10:17 PM, An Yang an.eurof...@gmail.com wrote: About 6 month release cycle, will meego release a TLS edtion? Do you mean LTS, as in Long Term Support ? ___ MeeGo-dev mailing list MeeGo-dev@meego.com

Re: [MeeGo-dev] Projected timelines for full openness

2010-04-21 Thread Greg KH
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 10:41:09AM +0800, An Yang wrote: ??? 2010-04-21?? 22:30 -0400???Robinson Tryon? On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 10:17 PM, An Yang an.eurof...@gmail.com wrote: About 6 month release cycle, will meego release a TLS edtion? Do you mean LTS, as in Long

Re: [MeeGo-dev] Projected timelines for full openness

2010-04-21 Thread An Yang
在 2010-04-21三的 20:40 -0700,Greg KH写道: On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 11:30:35AM +0800, An Yang wrote: I just mentioned about commercial customers, who want use meego for a very long term, I do not think they will or could reinstall or upgrade the OS in the phone or TV or car every 6 month. I'm

Re: [MeeGo-dev] Projected timelines for full openness

2010-04-21 Thread An Yang
在 2010-04-22四的 05:43 +0200,ronan.maclave...@nokia.com写道: Hi, I have two questions: Meego 1.0 is a company works in a close develop env, will it be opened in the future? open should means not only open the source code and rpm packages, but the develop process. Meego is a project

Re: [MeeGo-dev] Projected timelines for full openness

2010-04-21 Thread An Yang
在 2010-04-22四的 13:41 +0800,An Yang写道: 在 2010-04-21三的 21:09 -0700,Greg KH写道: On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 11:58:41AM +0800, An Yang wrote: yes, I'm one of them-:) But more stable more user, it's a good rule of any success products, no mater software or hardware, even none IT