Hey,
The QA process is a little iffy, but I do try awful hard :)
The process, in short:
- Mailing list is layer 1 of QA process. Patches for release are first
vetted here.
- I am the final layer of QA process for the stable tree... Patches are
tested (almost always...), reviewed, then included.
On Nov 6, 6:38 pm, "Clint Webb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> CAS does not stop the value from changing. It stops you from setting a
> value if it has changed since you did a GET. In which case you would need
> to handle it in whatever way suits your situation.
Yes, this is correct. It's no
Actually, just to clarify. My understanding of CAS may be wrong though...
Memcache doesnt "ensure that the value of the object will bot be changed
after get and before set"
It is not a lock. What it does is ensure that the SET does not happen if
something has changed the value after the GET.
On Nov 6, 12:48 pm, "Aaron Stone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Have a mailing list link? It'd be good to continue with where you left
> off / review what you were thinking at the time.
I wrote about it on my embarrassingly tongue-in-cheek titled blog:
http://www.rockstarprogrammer.org/pos
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 12:22 PM, Dustin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Nov 6, 11:51 am, "Aaron Stone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I've been lately about message queues, and noticing there are a
>> projects out there that speak memcache protocol for queues. Most of
>> them work by polling,
Is anyone out there using beanstalkd in a Java environment? I've
noticed that there aren't any Java clients out there for beanstalkd,
so I'm wondering if most are just using JMS topics/queues.
Thanks,
Ryan
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 3:22 PM, Dustin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Nov 6, 11:51 a
On Nov 6, 11:51 am, "Aaron Stone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been lately about message queues, and noticing there are a
> projects out there that speak memcache protocol for queues. Most of
> them work by polling, though, and that sucks, and most seems to
> overload the meaning of GET, al
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 8:51 PM, Aaron Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Folks,
>
Hi Aaron,
> I've been lately about message queues, and noticing there are a
> projects out there that speak memcache protocol for queues. Most of
> them work by polling, though, and that sucks, and most seems
Hi Aaron,
Have you looked at beanstalkd? It seems to have its own protocol that fits
the bill fairly well.
Cheers,
Mike
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 2:51 PM, Aaron Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Folks,
>
> I've been lately about message queues, and noticing there are a
> projects out there t
Hi Folks,
I've been lately about message queues, and noticing there are a
projects out there that speak memcache protocol for queues. Most of
them work by polling, though, and that sucks, and most seems to
overload the meaning of GET, all in different ways.
I'm imagining a generic set of protoco
On Nov 6, 9:39 am, jainy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What issues can I have while using CAS ?
>
> Is it atomic ?
>
> I believe its
>
> get and check + set
>
> Does memcached ensures that value of the object will not be changed
> after get and before set ?
Yes, this is the entire point of a CA
Anyone else get segmentation fault when running memcached? The error
in the apache log reads "[notice] child pid 10953 exit signal
Segmentation fault (11)". Which then causes a white screen of death.
I'm running memcached 1.2.6, php 5.2.6, and apache 2.2 on linux. The
apps I'm running are WordPre
What issues can I have while using CAS ?
Is it atomic ?
I believe its
get and check + set
Does memcached ensures that value of the object will not be changed
after get and before set ?
Regards,
Gaurav Jain
13 matches
Mail list logo
