1.2.7 call for fixes

2009-03-25 Thread dormando
Yo, In a few hours (or sometime tomorrow, at this point), I'm posting the final patch series for 1.2.7-rc for public review. They'll be up for about a day or two before we kick off the -rc. I've been combing my inbox for days and collecting the little odds and ends I might've missed, along with

Re: New wait timeout argument for the get() method.

2009-03-25 Thread Clint Webb
Memcached is an open-source project. There is nothing stopping you from making that change yourself and using it. However, you will have a hard time finding someone to do that feature for you for free, because quite frankly it is highly unlikely that anyone using memcached the way it was

Broken commit: 5a44468 Use AI_ADDRCONFIG more selectively.

2009-03-25 Thread dormando
Yo, 'stable' tree from dustin has a commit (5a44468) which disables the AI_ADRCONFIG flag unless -l is specified. This causes memcached to not start on machines without ipv6 configured unless you specify the -l option. I ... don't have a testbed onhand to figure out the original intent of the

Re: New wait timeout argument for the get() method.

2009-03-25 Thread Toru Maesaka
Hi! This is not what memcached should do. If a particular item doesn't exist, the daemon should not have to do anything extra. If you get a miss, it's a miss. This is a golden rule that should not be complicated nor broken. If you want to populate the missing item, do it after you get a miss

Re: Memcached Beta 1.3.2 Released

2009-03-25 Thread JC
On Mar 25, 12:08 am, Dustin dsalli...@gmail.com wrote:   What version of libevent are you using?  Is it possible that this is a factor? 1-4-9, also tested with 1-4-8, the behaviour is the same. I used the exact same libevent in all the tests (exhibiting latency or not) so I tend to rule out

Re: New wait timeout argument for the get() method.

2009-03-25 Thread Dustin
On Mar 25, 9:26 am, gf kak.serpom.po.yait...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, it is primitive implementation. Many threads can repeats one job. The best solution is acquiring the mutex, if acquired than we have to do the job and write to memcached, else we have to wait untill another thread (who

Re: New wait timeout argument for the get() method.

2009-03-25 Thread Dustin
On Mar 25, 9:31 am, gf kak.serpom.po.yait...@gmail.com wrote: Thank you for your anwer. I can pay if necessary. How much it costs? I can build you a custom version of memcached that does whatever you want, but you'd have to consider: 1) This will not be part of the core memcached server

Re: Broken commit: 5a44468 Use AI_ADDRCONFIG more selectively.

2009-03-25 Thread Dustin
On Mar 25, 12:32 am, dormando dorma...@rydia.net wrote: Yo, 'stable' tree from dustin has a commit (5a44468) which disables the AI_ADRCONFIG flag unless -l is specified. This causes memcached to not start on machines without ipv6 configured unless you specify the -l option. I ... don't

Re: New wait timeout argument for the get() method.

2009-03-25 Thread Les Mikesell
Dustin wrote: On Mar 25, 9:31 am, gf kak.serpom.po.yait...@gmail.com wrote: Thank you for your anwer. I can pay if necessary. How much it costs? I can build you a custom version of memcached that does whatever you want, but you'd have to consider: 1) This will not be part of the core

Re: New wait timeout argument for the get() method.

2009-03-25 Thread gf
А) It's possible if the timeout is big, I intend to use 0.1 as the timeout. B) It's possible. But the same (or lower) number of clients repeating get() every several ms run the server out of resources early.

Re: New wait timeout argument for the get() method.

2009-03-25 Thread gf
A) It's possible if the timeout is big, but I intend to use 0.1 seconds as the timeout. B) You are right. However, the lower number of clients repeating queries every several ms run the server out of resources early. On 25 мар, 20:07, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote: Dustin wrote: On

Re: New wait timeout argument for the get() method.

2009-03-25 Thread gf
How does the updater distinguish itself from the rest? acquire() (atomic add). On 25 мар, 21:38, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote: gf wrote: А)  It's possible if the timeout is big, I intend to use 0.1 as the timeout. Blocking everything for .1 sec would be a very bad thing. Is

Re: New wait timeout argument for the get() method.

2009-03-25 Thread Les Mikesell
gf wrote: How does the updater distinguish itself from the rest? acquire() (atomic add). So a whole bunch of clients try to add some sort of key that you hope are identical so all but one fail, the one that succeeds is supposed to do some more work? What if its next step fails? -- Les

memcache multiple MySQL DBs

2009-03-25 Thread Doodool Tala
Hello. Sorry if the answers to the following questions are trivial and/or have been provided already. 1. Can a single instance of memcached support (sit in front of) multiple MySQL servers? 2. If yes, is there a rule of thumb as of how many MySQL instances a single memcached can handle? 3.

Re: memcache multiple MySQL DBs

2009-03-25 Thread Dustin
On Mar 25, 5:07 pm, Doodool Tala doodool.t...@gmail.com wrote: Hello. Sorry if the answers to the following questions are trivial and/or have been provided already. 1. Can a single instance of memcached support (sit in front of) multiple MySQL servers? 2. If yes, is there a rule of thumb

latest southindian actress sexy video clips

2009-03-25 Thread durai.ma...@gmail.com
latest southindian actress sexy video clips http://paidtosurfads.blogspot.com