Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #2 on issue 93 by dsallings: Verbosity is inconsistent between text
and binary protocols
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=93
Dormando fixed in 783da601f99ba608273350d8566c43ab34a3af97
--
You received this message because you are list
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #2 on issue 94 by dsallings: Crash with keys larger than 250
characters.
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=94
Dormando fixed this in fcdf315b89d6407f80725493081fe1f52d1ca392
--
You received this message because you are listed in the o
On Oct 7, 5:34 pm, Eric Day wrote:
> Hi!
>
> It's actually not something that is entirely controlled in the server
> or client (unless you use raw sockets), this can happen due to the
> way I/O buffering happens in the operating system. A client/server
> can buffer things up and issue a single wr
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 6:55 PM, wrote:
> I've thought about this before, and Dustin just reiterated, that the
> default should probably be to allocate all of the memory requested at start
> time. It should attempt to do a mass allocation, and if that fails it
> should spin on 1 meg allocations u
Hi!
It's actually not something that is entirely controlled in the server
or client (unless you use raw sockets), this can happen due to the
way I/O buffering happens in the operating system. A client/server
can buffer things up and issue a single write() system call in hopes
they stay together,
> Does the memcached protocol support multiple commands in a single TCP
> packet? The protocol doc (http://code.sixapart.com/svn/memcached/
> trunk/server/doc/protocol.txt) says this is possible with UDP, but I
> have a case where TCP packets contain multiple commands. For example
> (some data c
On Oct 7, 4:23 pm, Daniel Nichter wrote:
> Does the memcached protocol support multiple commands in a single TCP
> packet? The protocol doc (http://code.sixapart.com/svn/memcached/
> trunk/server/doc/protocol.txt) says this is possible with UDP, but I
> have a case where TCP packets contain mu
Hello,
Does the memcached protocol support multiple commands in a single TCP
packet? The protocol doc (http://code.sixapart.com/svn/memcached/
trunk/server/doc/protocol.txt) says this is possible with UDP, but I
have a case where TCP packets contain multiple commands. For example
(some data cha
If code push is your issue, make code push easier...
In that I mean you don't have to push full code for twiddling something
like the list of memcached's. Split the list of servers off into a
seperate source file that's included, then give ops the ability to push
those subsets of files quickly an
> DRBD really doesnt make sense for memcached, since memcached doesnt hit the
> disk.
>
> What you really need is a way to keep the memcached memory arena (mostly) in
> sync between the pair.
>
> There is an open source patch, but it's old and has problems.
>
> There is also a commercial solutio
Status: Accepted
Owner: dorma...@rydia.net
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 95 by dorma...@rydia.net: Memory allocation default change (-m <
40 doesn't work)
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=95
Yo,
The default way memcached allocates memory is a little broken
Updates:
Status: Done
Comment #2 on issue 46 by dorma...@rydia.net: memcached-tool to display
evicted items
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=46
Dustin checked in 7af0829ced0ff7220cd7e5fb274150087b2d6407 which covers the
same
issue. Closing this one.
--
You rece
Fact.
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 4:31 PM, John Reilly wrote:
> +1
>
> On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 1:23 PM, Nelz wrote:
>>
>> As a user of Dustin's client, I corroborate what he said. It really is
>> the best Java client around.
>>
>> - Nelz
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 11:46, Dustin wrote:
>> >
>> >
>>
+1
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 1:23 PM, Nelz wrote:
>
> As a user of Dustin's client, I corroborate what he said. It really is
> the best Java client around.
>
> - Nelz
>
> On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 11:46, Dustin wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Oct 7, 11:36 am, sudo wrote:
> >> Which java client is most stable
As a user of Dustin's client, I corroborate what he said. It really is
the best Java client around.
- Nelz
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 11:46, Dustin wrote:
>
>
> On Oct 7, 11:36 am, sudo wrote:
>> Which java client is most stable for working with memcached?
>
> Well, I'd have to suggest mine. I m
On Oct 7, 11:36 am, sudo wrote:
> Which java client is most stable for working with memcached?
Well, I'd have to suggest mine. I maintain really high test
coverage, good performance, and keep up with server features (or stay
a bit ahead of them).
http://code.google.com/p/spymemcached/
Which java client is most stable for working with memcached?
thanks
Yes, I use DNS Made Easy for this use:
1) Create an A Record for each Memcached server with the SAME name
memcached.domain.com
2) Create an A Record for each Memcached server with a UNIQUE name
memcache.00.domain.com
Then do:
$ dig +short memcache.domain.com # This returns -->
10.0.0.1
10.0.0
We are doing the same thing as you on EC2, but we are using Dynamic
DNS "DDNS" with a script that updates dns memcached.xxx.com with the
new ip when the server boots.
checkout http://www.dnsmadeeasy.com/ & look at their DDNS and scripts.
everything you want is there, cheap, simple, & it works.
O
On Oct 7, 2009, at 10:21 AM, Nathan Nobbe wrote:
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 9:21 AM, Brian Moon wrote:
This has very little to do with memcached and everything to do with
your DNS infrastructure. The client that connects is what does the
DNS resolution. memcached has nothing to do with DNS.
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 9:21 AM, Brian Moon wrote:
>
> This has very little to do with memcached and everything to do with your
> DNS infrastructure. The client that connects is what does the DNS
> resolution. memcached has nothing to do with DNS.
>
> FWIW, we avoid dns lookups at all costs for
On Oct 6, 2009, at 9:54 AM, Matt Ingenthron wrote:
An example of what I found to be invasive before was a series of int
and size_t values being interchanged. I would end up making some
small changes, finding the header needed to change, that would then
require a bunch of other small cha
Hi Pankraj,
Here at nasza-klasa.pl we've developed a patch that I've described in
http://groups.google.com/group/memcached/browse_thread/thread/31d34fbf4a3184ef#
The idea is to eagerly perform garbage collection each second, so that
the curr_item is always equal to the actuall number of not expir
Hi Pankaj,
Here at nasza-klasa.pl we use a patch that I have described in this
post:
http://groups.google.com/group/memcached/browse_thread/thread/31d34fbf4a3184ef#
This patch performs the garbage collection eagerly, wich as a by
product gives you a curr_item which is always equal to nonexpired
e
This has very little to do with memcached and everything to do with your
DNS infrastructure. The client that connects is what does the DNS
resolution. memcached has nothing to do with DNS.
FWIW, we avoid dns lookups at all costs for memcached because it is just
one more thing that has to h
Updates:
Status: Done
Comment #2 on issue 47 by dorma...@rydia.net: Compile error with -D
ALLOW_SLABS_REASSIGN
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=47
The existing slab reassignment code was unfinished and unsupported, so it
will be
removed in 1.4.2. There will be ne
26 matches
Mail list logo
