The hackathon went well again. Admittedly, I didn't talk to everyone
there, but from the corner with the food, there was some additional
protocol work and tree merging going on. Please fill in interesting
things that happened that I didn't know about or forgot.
In particular, Toru implemented s
Hi,
About the opaque issue in the stats implementation, as much as I love
the 0x746f7275 idea (it would be funny)
Trond came up with a very flexible solution that looks like the way to
go (this happened at like 1am).
So, as far as the binary protocol spec goes, the server should really
send back
Oh, and I've shared the photos I've taken last night on Flickr too:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/tmaesaka/sets/72157608050620544/
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 12:53 AM, Toru Maesaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> About the opaque issue in the stats implementation, as much as I love
> the 0x746f
On Oct 15, 8:53 am, "Toru Maesaka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> About the opaque issue in the stats implementation, as much as I love
> the 0x746f7275 idea (it would be funny)
> Trond came up with a very flexible solution that looks like the way to
> go (this happened at like 1am).
The
A fun hackathon, folks were there until 2am. Other conversations that
I recall...
- Paul Saab & Marc Kwiatkowski described a bunch of the Facebook
changes that helped them get towards 300K reqs/sec on 8 core server.
I think they worked a bit towards putting up an svn/git repo so their
changes
co
so want to consider the hopscotch algorithm:
http://groups.google.com/group/hopscotch-hashing?pli=1
- Original Message
From: steve.yen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: memcached
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2008 9:08:26 AM
Subject: Re: Memcached Hackathon Report(s)
A fun hackathon, folks were
sh table (ala Cliff Click)."
>
> You may also want to consider the hopscotch algorithm:
> http://groups.google.com/group/hopscotch-hashing?pli=1
>
> - Original Message
> From: steve.yen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: memcached
> Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2008 9
;
You may also want to consider the hopscotch algorithm:
http://groups.google.com/group/hopscotch-hashing?pli=1
- Original Message
From: steve.yen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: memcached
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2008 9:08:26 AM
Subject: Re: Memcached Hackathon Report(s)
A fun hackath
On Oct 15, 2008, at 10:48 AM, Dustin wrote:
The hackathon went well again. Admittedly, I didn't talk to everyone
there, but from the corner with the food, there was some additional
protocol work and tree merging going on. Please fill in interesting
things that happened that I didn't know ab
On Oct 16, 2008, at 9:08 AM, steve.yen wrote:
- For those of you who thought a hash table per thread might be
interesting (like me), Trond says it's been tried and is not an
improvement. The contention just moves towards the request queueing
in front of each thread.
I have not tested
On Oct 19, 6:21 am, "Toru Maesaka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I fixed the stats opaque issue pointed out by Dustin's test case at
> the hackathon and just pushed it to github:
>
> http://github.com/tmaesaka/memcached/commit/86159eb7b5c611d25a33eb1cb...
Great, that's some code I
On Oct 19, 9:58 am, Trond Norbye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Eric Lambert fixed up some of the wording in the binary protocol
> specification (check outhttp://github.com/elambert/memcached/tree/binprot
> )
>
> Please make sure we get this fix merged in as well :)
I'd like to make
\
On Oct 19, 9:58 am, Trond Norbye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Eric Lambert fixed up some of the wording in the binary protocol
> specification (check outhttp://github.com/elambert/memcached/tree/binprot
> )
>
> Please make sure we get this fix merged in as well :)
This is all clea
> I would actually like to do a rewrite of this branch to fix the
> authors at some point. That will require coordination, but I think
> it'd be valuable to make sure everyone is credited for the work that
> they put into the project.
Well... I'm trying to think of the best way to do the merge
On Oct 25, 7:09 pm, dormando <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well... I'm trying to think of the best way to do the merge right now.
I tried that a few nights ago... it's not that clean.
> It's time to pull the binary tree into the "canonical" repo and start
> pushing changes/tags/releases there
15 matches
Mail list logo
