use repcache
2011/3/3 Nathan Nobbe :
> Hi all,
> I know I'll get blasted for not googling enough, but I have a quick
> question.
> I was under the impression memcached servers replicated data, such that if i
> have 2 servers and one machine goes down the data would all still be
> available on the
more here:
http://repcached.lab.klab.org/
2011/3/3 Roberto Spadim :
> use repcache
>
>
> 2011/3/3 Nathan Nobbe :
>> Hi all,
>> I know I'll get blasted for not googling enough, but I have a quick
>> question.
>> I was under the impression memcached servers replicated data, such that if i
>> have 2
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 2:44 PM, Roberto Spadim wrote:
> more here:
> http://repcached.lab.klab.org/
This was the first thing that came up on google, just wanted to verify
memcached doesn't replicate out-of-the-box.
thx,
-nathan
humm i will tell my experience
there´s two ideas
one replication (like raid1)
other load balance (like raid0 stripe)
client side can load balance like 'raid0' (i don´t know if libmemcache
have this, in php i use it, and works well)
repcache works like 'raid1' (for cluster and HA i´m using it w
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 3:02 PM, Roberto Spadim wrote:
> humm i will tell my experience
> there´s two ideas
> one replication (like raid1)
> other load balance (like raid0 stripe)
>
> client side can load balance like 'raid0' (i don´t know if libmemcache
> have this, in php i use it, and works
Hi Nathan,
On 3/3/11 1:42 PM, Nathan Nobbe wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I know I'll get blasted for not googling enough, but I have a quick
> question.
Here's a dime. Get yourself a web browser and bring me back $0.10
change. :) (said jokingly...)
>
> I was under the impression memcached servers repl
yeah that´s the other i forgot! :) membase
it works nice, but memcache / repcache and memcachedb can work like it
2011/3/3 Nathan Nobbe :
> On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 3:02 PM, Roberto Spadim
> wrote:
>>
>> humm i will tell my experience
>> there´s two ideas
>> one replication (like raid1)
>> othe
On 3/3/11 2:13 PM, Nathan Nobbe wrote:
> A friend has mentioned membase:
>
> http://www.membase.org/
>
> though I've hardly had a minute to investigate, it implements the
> memcache protocol, but it sounds like it may use something other than
> libmemcache on the backend.
It's a bit off topic for
humm membase = memcache+repcache+memcachedb
http://wiki.membase.org/display/membase/Membase+for+Memcached+Users
nice =)
2011/3/3 Matt Ingenthron :
> On 3/3/11 2:13 PM, Nathan Nobbe wrote:
>> A friend has mentioned membase:
>>
>> http://www.membase.org/
>>
>> though I've hardly had a minute to in
> Hi all,
> I know I'll get blasted for not googling enough, but I have a quick question.
>
> I was under the impression memcached servers replicated data, such that if i
> have 2 servers and one machine goes down the data would all still be
> available on the other machine. this with the underst
...or better still, when one of your cache servers go down, you hit the
databse (or other cache servers) till the broken one is fixed !!!
On 4 March 2011 01:42, dormando wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > I know I'll get blasted for not googling enough, but I have a quick
> question.
> >
> > I was under the
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 6:42 PM, dormando wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > I know I'll get blasted for not googling enough, but I have a quick
> question.
> >
> > I was under the impression memcached servers replicated data, such that
> if i have 2 servers and one machine goes down the data would all still
hum...
memcached is a cache (developers don´t care about database)
memcachedb is a a database with memcache library protocol
membase is a database with memcache library protocol
if you want database features use membase or memcachedb
2011/3/4 Nathan Nobbe :
> On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 6:42 PM, dor
On Mar 4, 9:11 am, Nathan Nobbe wrote:
> i know its OT, but .. thoughts? :)
He captured thoughts about this a while back in a blog post that's
worth a read either way:
http://dormando.livejournal.com/495593.html
guys, the creators of this much loved tool -- viz-a-viz memcache -- designed
it with one goal in mind: CACHING!!
using sessions with memcache would only make sense from a CACHING
standpoint, i.e. cache the session values in your memcache server and if the
caching fails for some reason or another,
> guys, the creators of this much loved tool -- viz-a-viz memcache -- designed
> it with one goal in mind: CACHING!!
>
> using sessions with memcache would only make sense from a CACHING standpoint,
> i.e. cache the session values in your memcache server and if the
> caching fails for some reason
On Mar 4, 2011 10:38 PM, "dormando" wrote:
> soo. it's more about matching the tool
> vs your actual needs. most of the problem here has always been separating
> perceieved requirements from actual requirements.
yeah, that's an incredibly important distinction.
On 3/4/11 3:54 AM, Priya wrote:
> Are the key-value pairs replicated on different nodes or does the pair
> remain with only on one RAM?
>
With memcached, key/value pairs remain only in one node in RAM. Have a
look at the wiki and the list archives for more info.
Good luck!
Matt
18 matches
Mail list logo
