loadbalancer help reducing memory use (tcp connections) and network use
(ethernet band)
using repcache you should balance 50%/50% connections to allow lowest tcp
memory use
in memcached you should use the best loadbalance you want (i prefer the
fastest ethernet link - lower latency) since only
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 8:55 PM, Kiran Kumar krn1...@gmail.com wrote:
Thank you very much .
Another question , If i dont use a LoadBalancer , Will the two Memcache
Servers (Server1 and Server2) with repcache installed on them , will they
be like active active cluster ??
Means , will
Thanks for your response and taking time to answer , As far as i know
Repcahe patch installed on Memcache is only for providing the replication
of Data with in the Servers and nothing to do with Load Balancing concept .
and i guess initially once the request is recievied from Client , the
I must admit, last time I played with recache was long time ago, so I
may not up-to-date with the latest details.
Re load-balancer, just take my notes regarding latency and throughput.
Sent from my iPhone
On 17 באוק 2012, at 09:15, Kiran Kumar krn1...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for your
Thank you very much .
On Wednesday, 17 October 2012 13:53:11 UTC+5:30, Yiftach wrote:
I must admit, last time I played with recache was long time ago, so I
may not up-to-date with the latest details.
Re load-balancer, just take my notes regarding latency and throughput.
Sent from my
You should take the following into account:
1. LB will add another network hop and therefore extra latency for each
request
2. Depending on the throughput of your Memcached servers, LB will probably
be the bottleneck (unless you are using HW based LB which is too expensive)
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012
Thank you very much .
Another question , If i dont use a LoadBalancer , Will the two Memcache
Servers (Server1 and Server2) with repcache installed on them , will they
be like active active cluster ??
Means , will the load (requests from memcache client ) would be
distributed between
