1/2 way through the can the sound changed so much that I thought
something was wrong. It was dramatic. But my diesel was clogged. I
don't think I run it hot enough. I'm going to change that and give it a
real work out.
Best $10 you can spend. And you only get your hands a little smelly of
Can someone run this VIN for me? 5GRGN23U53H107835 I'm curious, it's a
too good to be true type of deal. So I'm wondering if theft or
insurance write off is part of the history.
Thanks,
Ed
--
Knowledge is power... Power Corrupts. Study hard... Be Evil.
Alex Chamberlain wrote:
I know some people here (Levi?) have experience with Subarus. Is there any
good mailing list, web forum, etc. out there? The only ones I can find with
a quick Google search seem devoted to souping up WRX models. My
girlfriend's '98 Legacy has a slipping transmission
Thank you Jim. Every time I try to test something electrical I find don't
have the patience or knowledge to test it. I always seem to get the wrong
readings or different results each time. It is like if I can't physically
see it, I can't comprehend it. Maybe that is why I like magic so much
NTP Servers have rendered ultra-accurate watches obsolete.
--
I'm a man but I can change if I have to ... I guess.
quartz watches from 1970 did that long ago
On 3/10/07, LT Don [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
NTP Servers have rendered ultra-accurate watches obsolete.
--
I'm a man but I can change if I have to ... I guess.
___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see
On Sat, 10 Mar 2007 21:30:33 -0500 Gary Hurst [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
quartz watches from 1970 did that long ago
My wife found an old Citizen Quartz watch on the south side of our rural
Calhan, Colorado property when we lived there. It was the big square kind.
I opened it up, put a new battery
Seems to me that I used to wear a digital that was that accurate in the late
70s. I'd check the watch against WWV each time I flew as nav (about four
times a week) and it was 100% accurate to my-ear-tolerances.
Time accuracy was important, because my flight logs and nav fixes went into
court as
the generally invoked standard for super accuracy in a quartz watch is
10 seconds per year, so you did very well here. better quartz watches
will do that right out of the box.
the great irony is that those interested in quality timepieces have
pretty much rejected quartz. this is curious given
The federal Gv't gives an exemption of 400 gallons per quarter to homebrew
biodiesel people. There are a handful of states that do this also.
On Sat, 10 Mar 2007 10:10:22 -0600, Marshall Booth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The purpose of road fuel taxes is to fund roads and transit systems. As
At least you're consistant!
My quartz watches were rarely accurate enough, considering what they
shoul dhave been capable of. Now, my Casio Wave Ceptor sets it's
self to WWV, and does stay accurate. I'm watching to see if it changes
time tonight as it should. I do wish that Congress would stay
yup, time business should stick with the railroads where it belongs!
On 3/11/07, OK Don [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At least you're consistant!
My quartz watches were rarely accurate enough, considering what they
shoul dhave been capable of. Now, my Casio Wave Ceptor sets it's
self to WWV, and
would gain a second in two months, an accuracy of 0.4 parts per
million,
not too shabby for something worn on the wrist.
On the wrist is actually a pretty good place. Fairly well
temperature-regulated, you see.
For the keeping of time, pretty much nothing beats a quartz
movement. There are,
is it sad that i gave up wearing a watch? Someday I'll buy a Rolex
just because i've always wanted one, but not as a timepiece ...
On 3/11/07, Gary Hurst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yup, time business should stick with the railroads where it belongs!
On 3/11/07, OK Don [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
you couldn't possibly want one as a timepiece. the whole rolex appeal
so befuddles me.they are ok watches for like 400 bucks, yet they
remain a status symbol worldwide at over 10 times that price.
On 3/11/07, Sunil Hari [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
is it sad that i gave up wearing a watch?
On Sat, 10 Mar 2007 21:24:46 -0800 Jim Cathey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
would gain a second in two months, an accuracy of 0.4 parts per
million,
not too shabby for something worn on the wrist.
On the wrist is actually a pretty good place. Fairly well
temperature-regulated, you see.
I tried every way I could think of to capture the sound track of this video
or import it into ITunes with no luck.
http://rwebs.net/avhistory/fifi/
RLE
**
AOL now offers free email to everyone.
Find out more about what's free from AOL at
There's an old saying: a man with 1 watch knows what time it is - a man
with 2 watches always wonders.
Sorry - my wisdom for the day -
Larry T (67 MGB, 74 911, 78 240D, 91 300D)
www.youroil.net for Oil Analysis and Weber Parts
Test Results http://members.rennlist.com/oil
PORSCHE POSTERS!
Chris Kueny wrote:
This President only gives medals to people who screw things up.
Remember the assassin who was supposed to go to Randy Weaver's house and
shoot him dead? Shot Vicki Weaver instead. Got a medal for it. Randy got
$3 million from suing the government for the murder of his
ernest breakfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
the current regulatory hurdle here has to do with actually
getting the oil itself; you're supposed to be licensed to handle
used Veggie Oil, as it's listed as a Hazardous Substance (watch
those French Fries!), and technically can only be handled
A watch has two functions, a portable clock and a piece of jewelry.
Probably most of us old diesel drivers are more interested in the portable
clock function.
And a wrist clock can be bought relatively cheaply and provide almost any
accuracy you desire.
But a piece of jewelry is a whole 'nuther
Christopher McCann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If all road fuel and other road related income (tolls) were spent on
roads, there would be an absolute EXPLOSION in road and bridge
building. This is what is happening in Missouri. Actually, they are
paving roads that don't even need paved becuase
but what of my seiko that is neither accurate nor prestigious?
wouldn't there have to be a third function there, as seiko still sells
many of these sub $200 mechanical timepieces worldwide.
On 3/11/07, ned kleinhenz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A watch has two functions, a portable clock and a
http://www.herald-review.com/articles/2007/03/01/news/local_news/1021491.txt
I once lived in the great state of SillyNoise for a year. Makes Taxachewsetts
and Commiefornia look reasonable by comparison. The whole political scene is
dominated by the same idiots in Chicago who put Daleys in the
- Original Message -
From: OK Don [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- it's not like don't have there fingers into everything else already,
and just need something to do. I wonder
who benefits ($) from this change?
To see who benefits follow the $$. They go to the main force behind DST,
the
My 50 YO Rolex, still sitting in a drawer, still works just fine. We had
this discussion once before, though.
BillR
- Original Message -
From: Sunil Hari [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Mercedes Discussion List mercedes@okiebenz.com
Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2007 1:25 AM
Subject: Re: [MBZ]
The function of that one is to get your $$.
BillR
- Original Message -
From: Gary Hurst [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Mercedes Discussion List mercedes@okiebenz.com
Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2007 12:43 PM
Subject: Re: [MBZ] MBZ] hijacked to certainty
but what of my seiko that is neither
Me,too, on the Nav acvcuracy, LT Don, but did you you ever have to go to
court Re: position/time? I haven't, yet. Lucky, I guess.
Wilton
But I haven't worn a watch in 15 yrs.
Wilton
I didn't go into court personally, but my nav logs did. We were flying
fishery patrols and occasionally found someone catching the wrong species of
fish or in the wrong fishing area. I had to certify that my fixes were
taken at the time noted (zulu) in the paperwork.
On 3/11/07, wilton
I'm having the control arms changed out in the front of my 124, BUT what
can I do about the slightly wandering rear end? I get a slight side to
side wandering above 40mph
Is this the rear end or could it be related to my spoiled control arms?
If it is the rear, which bushing do I need to
I'm having the control arms changed out in the front of my 124, BUT
what
can I do about the slightly wandering rear end? I get a slight side to
side wandering above 40mph
The multi-link rear suspension of the 201/124 (and probably everything
later) is prone to this. You need to replace the
i've got a bunch of watches that age or older that work just fine.
i've got a 1920s waltham wristwatch the works fine. it's worth about
10 bucks. how much your rolex worth?
On 3/11/07, BillR [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My 50 YO Rolex, still sitting in a drawer, still works just fine. We had
the reason is that the shock resistance is greater than any automatic
watch movement ever made and the service requirements are lesser than
any ever made (they will generally run a minimum of 10 years before
needing attention and some have been known to run much longer. try
that with a fine
If I recall correctly the last time I had a watch person check it out, about
$4k. That is 66. times what I paid for it. Turns out it is one of the
'collectable' sort.
Trade you for a nice SDL
BillR
- Original Message -
From: Gary Hurst [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Mercedes
35 matches
Mail list logo
