Dieselhead wrote:
> I have had new MB Factory parts from the dealer fail immediately too. Not
> motor mounts, but other things.
The mounts you took from here should be decent.
They were new put in from dealer about 9 years ago.
mao
___
http://www.okiebenz.com
F
Jaime wrote:
> I buy enough parts that I have two dealers flighting for my business with
> excellent pricing.
I'm gonna price my parts thru Jaime from now on.
mao
___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
To search list archives
Rack damper spring? I had to replace it on my '82 with a newer
version, but
your '92 should atlready have that.
There is no damper on the IP.
The 190D with manual transmission has a damper on the IP.
(Not the rack damper bolt, and actual little hydraulic strut.)
Helps tame the bucking of the c
Rack damper spring? I had to replace it on my '82 with a newer version, but
your '92 should atlready have that.
On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 9:49 AM, Kaleb C. Striplin wrote:
> There is no damper on the IP.
>
> On 7/17/2011 6:57 AM, Hans Neureiter wrote:
>
>> Did you check the damper on the IP?
>>
>>
Mercedes Discussion List
Subject: Re: [MBZ] New motor mounts bad?
They are the same or very similar to the mounts on your 124. I am
going to have to crawl up under there and look at them I suppose.
I did discover I did not replace the tranny mount when I replaced
the motor mounts so maybe that i
e Kopchinski"
> To: "Mercedes Discussion List"
> Sent: Sunday, July 17, 2011 8:08 AM
> Subject: Re: [MBZ] New motor mounts bad?
>
>
>> Here is my extreme view on this topic:
>>
>> This is exactly why you shouldn't buy rubber parts (including s
/ 1-800-741-5252
Fax/ 770-454-9745
ICQ 427542441
AIM BuyMBparts
- Original Message -
From: "Jaime Kopchinski"
To: "Mercedes Discussion List"
Sent: Sunday, July 17, 2011 8:08 AM
Subject: Re: [MBZ] New motor mounts bad?
Here is my extreme view on this topic:
Thi
enz.com]
> On Behalf Of Kaleb C. Striplin
> Sent: Sunday, July 17, 2011 7:51 AM
> To: Mercedes Discussion List
> Subject: Re: [MBZ] New motor mounts bad?
>
> They are the same or very similar to the mounts on your 124. I am
> going to have to crawl up under there and look at th
Discussion List
Subject: Re: [MBZ] New motor mounts bad?
They are the same or very similar to the mounts on your 124. I am
going to have to crawl up under there and look at them I suppose.
I did discover I did not replace the tranny mount when I replaced
the motor mounts so maybe that is it
I have had new MB Factory parts from the dealer fail immediately too.
Not motor mounts, but other things. Even MB is not above and beyond
gremlins, shoddy suppliers and human error
The new mounts I got from Rusty for the Snookmobile 300D are still fine
after all these years.
When I instal
The new mounts I got from Rusty for the Snookmobile 300D are still fine
after all these years.
When I installed the factory reman crate engine in the '76 300D, I bought
"new" mounts from the local indy who got them from the dealer in Kansas
City. One of them collapsed on letting the engine down. I
- From: Kaleb C. Striplin
Sent: Saturday, July 16, 2011 10:47 PM
To: mercedes Mailing List
Subject: [MBZ] New motor mounts bad?
When I did all the engine work to my 92 300SD I replaced the motor
mounts. They never did seem exactly smooth but every time I drive
the thing its worse and worse. Today I
There is no damper on the IP.
On 7/17/2011 6:57 AM, Hans Neureiter wrote:
Did you check the damper on the IP?
On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 9:47 PM, Kaleb C. Striplinwrote:
When I did all the engine work to my 92 300SD I replaced the motor mounts.
They never did seem exactly smooth but every time
-Original Message-
From: Kaleb C. Striplin
Sent: Saturday, July 16, 2011 10:47 PM
To: mercedes Mailing List
Subject: [MBZ] New motor mounts bad?
When I did all the engine work to my 92 300SD I replaced the motor
mounts. They never did seem exactly smooth but every time I drive
the thing its worse
Here is my extreme view on this topic:
This is exactly why you shouldn't buy rubber parts (including suspension)
from anywhere but the dealer. As hard as guys like Rusty may try,
aftermarket parts are turning to crap quickly. OE quality, etc, is all BS.
Unless the part has a three pointed star
Did you check the damper on the IP?
On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 9:47 PM, Kaleb C. Striplin wrote:
> When I did all the engine work to my 92 300SD I replaced the motor mounts.
> They never did seem exactly smooth but every time I drive the thing its
> worse and worse. Today I drove it after finding
They could be bad. Rubber deteriorates with age, regardless of use. If the
were on the shelve for 20 years?
I bought a set of "brand new" fork gaiters for my '72 Triumph. They didn't
survive installation.
On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 9:47 PM, Kaleb C. Striplin wrote:
> When I did all the engine work
Injectors don't cause vibrations like this maybe a miss or rough idle
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 16, 2011, at 10:35 PM, Max Dillon wrote:
> Injectors?
>
> Max
> --
> Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
>
> "Kaleb C. Striplin" wrote:
>
> When I did all the en
Injectors?
Max
--
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
"Kaleb C. Striplin" wrote:
When I did all the engine work to my 92 300SD I replaced the motor
mounts. They never did seem exactly smooth but every time I drive
the thing its worse and worse. Today I drove i
When I did all the engine work to my 92 300SD I replaced the motor
mounts. They never did seem exactly smooth but every time I drive
the thing its worse and worse. Today I drove it after finding
both sets of keys that have been lost for a couple of months (one
was in the drawer where they wer
20 matches
Mail list logo
