Nathan Russell wrote:
> Last time I checked, there were two universtites (labeled as such that is)
> at the top of the list but no companies really near the top.
Ja, however if someone manages to get a realy big company to
play, there might be some very good reasons to *not* show up
in the t
>From: Jukka Tapani Santala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: Nathan Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: Mersenne: searching the biggies
>Date: Sat, 4 Mar 2000 01:19:56 +0200 (EET)
>
>On Fri, 3 Mar 2000, Nathan Russell wrote:
> > >>Two of their other projects lost GIMPS-year
>From: George Woltman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "Nathan Russell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: Mersenne: searching the biggies
>Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2000 16:32:10 -0500
>
>Hi,
>
>>I don't honestly think I would have the patience to run 10 M tests,
>
>Me too. 1 year for a 1 in 250,000 chance -
On Fri, Mar 03, 2000 at 04:46:30AM -0800, Paul Leyland wrote:
>George is an honorable man, I'm sure, and has not knowingly put in any
>loopholes. I'm equally sure that he's not infallible and that he will
>freely admit to this. Do *you* want to bet the security of your site even
>more than you a
Mersenne Digest Friday, March 3 2000 Volume 01 : Number 701
--
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2000 20:40:35 -0800
From: "John R Pierce" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Mersenne: Williamette
Hmm. Microprocessor Reports has r
>From: George Woltman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "Nathan Russell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: Mersenne: searching the biggies
>Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2000 11:39:44 -0500
>
>Hi,
>
>At 11:42 PM 3/2/00 -0500, Nathan Russell wrote:
>>>Nathan Russell asked: How much are the people
On 3 Mar 00, at 17:42, Dave Mullen wrote:
> Now a number of 10 million decimals is approx. 33 million bits long i.e.
> the Prime Exponent would be approx. 33 million.
Yes, this is perfectly true.
>
> And I'm sure some of you have read the theories about the "missing
> Mersenne", and the analysi
>From: "Dave Mullen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Mersenne: Re: How much are the 10 M gamblers contributing?
>Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2000 17:42:02 +0800
>
>Perhaps I'm a little under-speed here ...
>
>I understood that the $100,000 award was for the first 10 million digit
>
>From: "Aaron Blosser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "Mersenne@Base. Com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: RE: Mersenne: searching the biggies 2
>Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2000 21:33:23 -0700
>
> >On the other hand, the existence of the EFF prize is a useful
> >tool in convincing companies to run GIMPS, for mos
> linux is a Good Move ... ceratinly, in its default state, it's at
> least as secure (when used as a firewall) as anything emanating from
> a certain purveyor of operating systems based near Seattle. It's
> cheaper, too!
Please note: Seattle is about 5000 miles from where I am, despite my
add
Hi all,
Thanks to all that have submitted timings. There are still plenty
of gaps to fill in and having multiple results for each machine is desirable.
My first draft of the benchmark page is at http://www.mersenne.org/bench.htm
Comments are of course welcome.
Regards,
Hi,
At 11:42 PM 3/2/00 -0500, Nathan Russell wrote:
>>Nathan Russell asked: How much are the people who are trying to
>>find a 10 million digit prime contributing to the search?
I agree that all machines are contributing to our knowledge of Mersenne
numbers. The gaps will eventually be closed.
> -Original Message-
> From: Spike Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> On the other hand, the existence of the EFF prize is a useful
> tool in convincing companies to run GIMPS, for most IT
> managers are quick to remind you that this *is* a business,
> and it is here to make money.
Perhaps I'm a little under-speed here
...
I understood that the $100,000 award was for the
first 10 million digit (that is to say 10 million decimal digit Mersenne
Prime).
Now a number of 10 million decimals is approx.
33 million bits long i.e. the Prime Exponent would be approx. 33
mi
14 matches
Mail list logo
