- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Robin Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 10:28 PM
Subject: Re: Mersenne: Work being wasted
Nah, the candle is being burned from both ends. The point is that
the small ones _are_ being poached.
- Original Message -
From: Maciej Hrynczyszyn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Mersenne List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, February 03, 2002 10:48 PM
Subject: Re: Mersenne: Work being wasted
...what should I do in
order not to waste my (my A1200) time working on numbers which may be
taken over
I want to do P-1 testing specifically, so I've been unreserving DC exponants
after completing this stage, but before starting the test. A feature of the
Primenet server is that it hands out the lowest available exponant of the
type requested, which is liable to be the one just unreserved. The
- Original Message -
From: Bruce Leenstra [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 8:46 PM
Subject: Re: Mersenne: Work being wasted
So I would urge George and Scott to at least change it so that -- if an
exponent has been assigned to more than one person
- Original Message -
From: Aaron Blosser [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 5:18 PM
Subject: RE: Mersenne: Work being wasted
it just bothers me when someone decides to do Google
searches in some sort of attempt to find information on someone in
- Original Message -
From: Steve Elias [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 1:43 PM
Subject: Re: Mersenne: Work being wasted
no way! i understand that statement is nonsense. morality ethics
are not defined by people's own ideas, they are defined
...what should I do in
order not to waste my (my A1200) time working on numbers which may
be
taken over by someone else in some uncertain future? Currently I'm
finishing my first exponent (that's M7505207 double-check)...
Don't disclose your exponants to a list read by Aaron Blosser.
All,
What this list needs right now is a nice juicy math debate, so here goes:
I was reading the faq about P-1 factoring, and it talks about constructing a
'q' that is the product of all primes less than B1 (with some multiples?)
And then I read the skip 2, test 2 comment about trial factoring
On Thu, 7 Feb 2002, Daran wrote:
Better would be to store every name until a valid doublecheck proves the
exponant composite. The extra storage would be negligable.
I'd suggest that names not be stored for exponents that have been
unreserved, or where the name was last assigned that exponent
Bruce Leenstra wrote:
What this list needs right now is a nice juicy math debate, so here goes:
I was reading the faq about P-1 factoring, and it talks about constructing a
'q' that is the product of all primes less than B1 (with some multiples?)
...
Right now Prime95 constructs a list of
On 7 Feb 2002, at 14:11, Daran wrote:
Nah, the candle is being burned from both ends. The point is that
the small ones _are_ being poached. If you work in the same order as
the poacher, work on lots of exponents will be replicated. If you
work in the opposite order, only one exponent
11 matches
Mail list logo
