Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 0/4] Call for testing: Gallium set_index_buffer removal etc.

2017-05-08 Thread Marek Olšák
Alright so I think this is almost ready to go. My repository contains an update from today (mainly adding Brian's svga fixes and some fixes for Nine). These are projects I haven't heard anything from since I last mentioned them: - etnaviv - freedreno - virgl - nine I suppose they would be OK

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 0/4] Call for testing: Gallium set_index_buffer removal etc.

2017-05-04 Thread Brian Paul
On 05/03/2017 10:37 PM, Brian Paul wrote: On 05/01/2017 10:03 AM, Brian Paul wrote: On 05/01/2017 08:32 AM, Brian Paul wrote: On 04/28/2017 05:12 PM, Marek Olšák wrote: Hi, This series shrinks various gallium structures and removes set_index_buffer in order to decrease CPU overhead. PART

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 0/4] Call for testing: Gallium set_index_buffer removal etc.

2017-05-03 Thread Brian Paul
On 05/01/2017 10:03 AM, Brian Paul wrote: On 05/01/2017 08:32 AM, Brian Paul wrote: On 04/28/2017 05:12 PM, Marek Olšák wrote: Hi, This series shrinks various gallium structures and removes set_index_buffer in order to decrease CPU overhead. PART 1: Performance results All testing below

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 0/4] Call for testing: Gallium set_index_buffer removal etc.

2017-05-03 Thread Cherniak, Bruce
> On May 2, 2017, at 5:33 PM, Marek Olšák wrote: > > On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 12:18 AM, Cherniak, Bruce > wrote: >> >> On May 2, 2017, at 4:11 PM, Cherniak, Bruce >> wrote: >> >> >> On May 2, 2017, at 3:41 PM, Cherniak,

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 0/4] Call for testing: Gallium set_index_buffer removal etc.

2017-05-02 Thread Marek Olšák
On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 12:18 AM, Cherniak, Bruce wrote: > > On May 2, 2017, at 4:11 PM, Cherniak, Bruce > wrote: > > > On May 2, 2017, at 3:41 PM, Cherniak, Bruce > wrote: > > PART 2: Call for testing > > These

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 0/4] Call for testing: Gallium set_index_buffer removal etc.

2017-05-02 Thread Cherniak, Bruce
On May 2, 2017, at 4:11 PM, Cherniak, Bruce > wrote: On May 2, 2017, at 3:41 PM, Cherniak, Bruce > wrote: PART 2: Call for testing These drivers have been tested: - ddebug -

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 0/4] Call for testing: Gallium set_index_buffer removal etc.

2017-05-02 Thread Cherniak, Bruce
> On May 2, 2017, at 3:41 PM, Cherniak, Bruce wrote: > >> PART 2: Call for testing >> >> These drivers have been tested: >> - ddebug >> - llvmpipe >> - r300 (also with SWTCL) >> - r600 >> - radeonsi >> - softpipe >> - trace >> >> These drivers need testing: >> -

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 0/4] Call for testing: Gallium set_index_buffer removal etc.

2017-05-02 Thread Cherniak, Bruce
> PART 2: Call for testing > > These drivers have been tested: > - ddebug > - llvmpipe > - r300 (also with SWTCL) > - r600 > - radeonsi > - softpipe > - trace > > These drivers need testing: > - etnaviv > - freedreno > - nv30 > - nv50 > - nvc0 > - svga > - swr > - vc4 > - virgl Tested on swr.

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 0/4] Call for testing: Gallium set_index_buffer removal etc.

2017-05-02 Thread Eric Anholt
Marek Olšák writes: > PART 2: Call for testing > > These drivers have been tested: > - ddebug > - llvmpipe > - r300 (also with SWTCL) > - r600 > - radeonsi > - softpipe > - trace > > These drivers need testing: > - etnaviv > - freedreno > - nv30 > - nv50 > - nvc0 > - svga > -

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 0/4] Call for testing: Gallium set_index_buffer removal etc.

2017-05-01 Thread Brian Paul
On 05/01/2017 08:32 AM, Brian Paul wrote: On 04/28/2017 05:12 PM, Marek Olšák wrote: Hi, This series shrinks various gallium structures and removes set_index_buffer in order to decrease CPU overhead. PART 1: Performance results All testing below was done with radeonsi, and I used the

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 0/4] Call for testing: Gallium set_index_buffer removal etc.

2017-05-01 Thread Brian Paul
On 04/28/2017 05:12 PM, Marek Olšák wrote: Hi, This series shrinks various gallium structures and removes set_index_buffer in order to decrease CPU overhead. PART 1: Performance results All testing below was done with radeonsi, and I used the drawoverhead microbenchmark from mesa/demos

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 0/4] Call for testing: Gallium set_index_buffer removal etc.

2017-04-29 Thread Ilia Mirkin
On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 7:12 PM, Marek Olšák wrote: > These drivers need testing: > - nv30 > - nv50 > - nvc0 I'm going to try to test these by Wednesday May 3. If you don't hear from me (or anyone else regarding these drivers), don't wait. Cheers, -ilia

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 0/4] Call for testing: Gallium set_index_buffer removal etc.

2017-04-29 Thread Edmondo Tommasina
Hi Marek I've also tested this series with nine and STALKER: CoC. Sadly it segfaults. Bisected to this patch: "gallium: remove pipe_index_buffer and set_index_buffer" edmondo On Sat, Apr 29, 2017 at 1:12 AM, Marek Olšák wrote: > Hi, > > This series shrinks various gallium

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 0/4] Call for testing: Gallium set_index_buffer removal etc.

2017-04-29 Thread Mike Lothian
Hi I've just tested this with Nine. It causes a weird white strobing effect - I think there are other graphical glitches too but it's hard to tell I was testing the blizzard app http://eu.battle.net/en/app/ the same also happens when World of Warcraft is launched This doesn't happen if I use

[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 0/4] Call for testing: Gallium set_index_buffer removal etc.

2017-04-28 Thread Marek Olšák
Hi, This series shrinks various gallium structures and removes set_index_buffer in order to decrease CPU overhead. PART 1: Performance results All testing below was done with radeonsi, and I used the drawoverhead microbenchmark from mesa/demos ported to piglit and using GL 3.0 Compat and GL