http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24766
Dan Nicholson dbn.li...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24766
Chow Loong Jin hyper...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #30761|0 |1
is
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24766
--- Comment #9 from Dan Nicholson dbn.li...@gmail.com 2009-10-27 23:00:35
PST ---
(In reply to comment #7)
@Dan Nicholson: Sticking 64-bit libraries into /usr/lib64 instead of /usr/lib
would require changing Debian's packaging policy as
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24766
--- Comment #10 from Chow Loong Jin hyper...@gmail.com 2009-10-27 23:24:14
PST ---
(In reply to comment #9)
(In reply to comment #7)
@Dan Nicholson: Sticking 64-bit libraries into /usr/lib64 instead of
/usr/lib
would require changing
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24766
Chow Loong Jin hyper...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #30758|0 |1
is
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24766
--- Comment #12 from Henri Verbeet hverb...@gmail.com 2009-10-28 03:36:33
PST ---
(In reply to comment #9)
You may want to open a bug in ubuntu to see what the developers say. If this
is
a debian/ubuntu policy, then I don't know why it
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24766
Dan Nicholson dbn.li...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
---
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24766
--- Comment #1 from Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org 2009-10-27 12:44:10
PST ---
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 11:40:05 -0700, bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org wrote:
On Ubuntu Karmic x86_64, all 32-bit applications which use DRI fail to have
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24766
--- Comment #2 from Chow Loong Jin hyper...@gmail.com 2009-10-27 13:31:25
PST ---
Well, the other way would be to recompile every 32-bit library within ia32-libs
with --libdir=/usr/lib32, which doesn't seem like a particularly good idea to
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24766
--- Comment #3 from Dan Nicholson dbn.li...@gmail.com 2009-10-27 14:09:35
PST ---
Why not just build mesa so that the paths are correct? There's even a switch,
--with-dri-driverdir, that sets this correctly. I don't think things will work
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24766
--- Comment #4 from Chow Loong Jin hyper...@gmail.com 2009-10-27 16:50:16
PST ---
Building with --libdir=/usr/lib32 won't work, since 32-bit machines do use
/usr/lib after all. The whole point of this was to avoid the requirement of
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24766
--- Comment #5 from Dan Nicholson dbn.li...@gmail.com 2009-10-27 17:26:47
PST ---
I don't think you can have it both ways. If your system's ABI is 32 bit in
/usr/lib32 and 64 bit in /usr/lib, then you should probably build the binaries
that
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24766
--- Comment #6 from Corbin Simpson mostawesomed...@gmail.com 2009-10-27
18:01:15 PST ---
Multilib distributions always have extra baggage on their shoulders, and this
is just one more bit of it. I'm really struggling to see how this is our
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24766
--- Comment #7 from Chow Loong Jin hyper...@gmail.com 2009-10-27 19:07:18
PST ---
@Dan Nicholson: Sticking 64-bit libraries into /usr/lib64 instead of /usr/lib
would require changing Debian's packaging policy as well as every derivative of
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24766
--- Comment #8 from Chow Loong Jin hyper...@gmail.com 2009-10-27 19:08:26
PST ---
For reference, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ia32-libs/+bug/248392
is the original bug downstream.
--
Configure bugmail:
15 matches
Mail list logo
