Hello guys,
On 6/3/2019 7:43 PM, Jean-Francois Dagenais wrote:
Thanks for the comeback Luca.
On Jun 3, 2019, at 03:47, Luca Ceresoli wrote:
Not really I'm afraid, but I tried building a pmufw now without
multiconfig and it succeeds in master, thud and the shiny new
rel-v2019.01 branch on
Hi Mike,
> -Original Message-
> From: meta-xilinx-boun...@yoctoproject.org boun...@yoctoproject.org> On Behalf Of Mike Looijmans
> Sent: Tuesday, June 4, 2019 6:09 AM
> To: Luca Ceresoli ; Manjukumar Harthikote Matha
> ; meta-xilinx@yoctoproject.org
> Subject: Re: [meta-xilinx] Build and
That is great news!
> On Jun 3, 2019, at 14:07, Manjukumar Harthikote Matha
> wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> We plan to release warrior by end of month.
> We also want to see if we can backport patches of u-boot from Luca to enable
> cleaner SPL flow for PMU config objects.
> If we cannot do it by
> On Jun 4, 2019, at 13:40, Alejandro Hernandez
> wrote:
>
> Multiconfig should not have anything to do with this,
> I'm not exactly sure what you are running into, since I'm not able to
> reproduce it
> but I don't see why those directories would exist, I would try cleaning as
> well and
Hi guys, (Xilinx embeddedsw repo people, read on below please.)
Figured it out. You were correct Luca. I made a simple bblayers/local.conf
setup in an empty dir.
> On Jun 4, 2019, at 04:04, Luca Ceresoli wrote:
>
> Do you mean the "rel-v2019.1" branch of meta-xilinx? Or the
> "xilinx-v2019.1"
Hi Mike,
On 04/06/19 15:08, Mike Looijmans wrote:
> On 04-06-19 14:58, Luca Ceresoli wrote:
>> Hi Mike,
>>
>> On 04/06/19 07:41, Mike Looijmans wrote:
>>> On 03-06-19 16:25, Manjukumar Harthikote Matha wrote:
Hi Mike,
> -Original Message-
> From:
On 04-06-19 14:58, Luca Ceresoli wrote:
Hi Mike,
On 04/06/19 07:41, Mike Looijmans wrote:
On 03-06-19 16:25, Manjukumar Harthikote Matha wrote:
Hi Mike,
-Original Message-
From: meta-xilinx-boun...@yoctoproject.org On Behalf Of Mike Looijmans
Sent: Monday, June 3, 2019 7:01 AM
To:
Hi Mike,
On 04/06/19 07:41, Mike Looijmans wrote:
> On 03-06-19 16:25, Manjukumar Harthikote Matha wrote:
>> Hi Mike,
>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: meta-xilinx-boun...@yoctoproject.org >> boun...@yoctoproject.org> On Behalf Of Mike Looijmans
>>> Sent: Monday, June 3, 2019 7:01 AM
Simplest way to reduce CPU usage is to use video-for-Linux directly (it's
quite simple actually). This will give you access to the "raw" stream from the
camera, which is usually in YUV or MJPEG format (OpenCV forcibly converts
everything to RGB which makes for easy programming but horrible CPU
Hi,
We are using Xilinx UltraScale UZ3EG MpSoc
we are using OpenCV to capture the video stream from USB Camera node
/dev/video0
but the CPU utilization is not good, it consumes around 80% of the CPU.
To reduce the CPU consumption, we would like use the VCU available on
UZ3EG.
Kindly let us
On 03-06-19 16:25, Manjukumar Harthikote Matha wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: meta-xilinx-boun...@yoctoproject.org > boun...@yoctoproject.org> On Behalf Of Mike Looijmans
>> Sent: Monday, June 3, 2019 7:01 AM
>> To: meta-xilinx@yoctoproject.org
>> Subject:
Hi Jean-Francois,
On 04/06/19 04:43, Jean-Francois Dagenais wrote:
> Thanks for the comeback Luca.
>
>> On Jun 3, 2019, at 03:47, Luca Ceresoli wrote:
>>
>> Not really I'm afraid, but I tried building a pmufw now without
>> multiconfig and it succeeds in master, thud and the shiny new
>>
12 matches
Mail list logo
