Years ago, Mark Lucas produced a now defunct X called "Place Picture" that
allowed importion and display of graphics into Supercard.
(including, alas no longer available,. . .EPS files)
Part of that X was a fade screen up and down by gamma control. Of course
this only applied to the entire scree
Aloha:
this may be off topic since I should probably go to a "color school" with
these questions wherever that may be. . . But maybe someone knows: I need to
find a color system in MC that is dependable across platforms. Obviously
using the system palette is not an option if you are on a MAC. . a
On 2/5/00 6:14 pm, Peter Reid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Under Windows 98, I've just tried a command such as:
>
> put shell("dir c:\test.txt") into field "Info"
>
> but I get no details! If I do the following:
>
> put shell("dir c:\test.txt > info.txt") into theResult
>
> then I get the DI
On Tue, 2 May 2000, Sivakatirswami wrote:
> There are times when I want "all scripts to shut down" while I do basic
> construction. But lockMessages set to true only "sticks once" i.e. if you
> are in the stack components examining various cards and work to create new
> card in new positions add
I have run a test of functionality across HP-UNIX, UNIX SGI, Windows 98, and
Windows NT. The two issues I run into that may cause the biggest headaches
are resolution (both on the screen and when printing), and superimposition
of screen elements. For example, the pointer on a cascading button over
There are times when I want "all scripts to shut down" while I do basic
construction. But lockMessages set to true only "sticks once" i.e. if you
are in the stack components examining various cards and work to create new
card in new positions add graphics. . .you can lockmessages in the message
bo
>What if the first data item in each record were a number whose
>value is either:
>- the offset of that record?
> (this doesn't support record deletions unless the file is
>never compressed)
>- the number of that record?
> (same limitation as above)
>
>If you can live with the stated limit
Scott Rossi wrote:
> Recently, Kevin Miller wrote:
>
> > perhaps there is room for a new
> > function here? How about mouseDownLoc()?
>
> At first I thought this was a good idea, but then it occurred
> to me that it would probably be useful to make a distinction
> between a "one-time" functi
