ive.
Hope this helps!
Lori C. Fraind
Delex Systems, Inc.
(703) 734-8300 x310
-Original Message-
From: David Bovill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2000 10:13 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: RE: Metacard based browser?
What's a SCORM when you find one?
>
> From:Geoff Canyon [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> Sent:Saturday, August 05, 2000 2:35 PM
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: Re: Metacard based browser?
>>
>> Scott Rossi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said, on 8/4/00 6:14 PM:
>>
>> >If your goal
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Metacard based browser?
>
> Scott Rossi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said, on 8/4/00 6:14 PM:
>
> >If your goal is to create a new standard for page description, then maybe
>
> >you have a reachable (and laudible) goal, but for c
Practically speaking I'd like to start by enabling Metacard to download, browse and
search the online list archives.
The first problem is I can't get the html page, as there is a re-diret on it and:
get url "http://www.mail-archive.com/metacard%40lists.best.com/"
url "http://www.mail
Geoff Canyon wrote:
>
> Scott Rossi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said, on 8/4/00 6:14 PM:
>
> >If your goal is to create a new standard for page description, then maybe
> >you have a reachable (and laudible) goal, but for current HTML, I would
> >suggest taking a step back and evaluating if you really ha
Geoff Canyon wrote:
> I can see it now--little badges everywhere on the web saying "This site
> best viewed in MetaCard!" This morning, www.warnerbros.com said I had to
> have Netscape or Internet Explorer, _and_ Flash, in order to use their
> site at _all_ What a thrill it would be to have some
Scott Rossi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said, on 8/4/00 6:14 PM:
>If your goal is to create a new standard for page description, then maybe
>you have a reachable (and laudible) goal, but for current HTML, I would
>suggest taking a step back and evaluating if you really have that kind of
>time availabl
>>
>>Please, can anyone save me from the RFC???
>
>There is no escape from RFCs :-0
>>
Aha, but there is. For now I can use an xThing. I've looked at the "Really Friendly C"
stuff, and I have'nt got a word to say against them - just a bit long maybe. By the
way where are they again?
Archives:
>A French car?
>
>>Scott Rossi wrote:
>>
>>> My guess is, if you're looking to be able to parse the HTML from any
>>> existing Web page, you're in for a thousand and one headaches.
>>
>>One word: tables.
>>
>>Okay, two words: nested tables.
>>
>
>The thought makes me shiver -:)
>
>OK, here is
>I was thinking of using CSSP for layouts for users with later browsers, and designing
>style sheets that then work and look good for both the MetaCard environment and the
>average web user. Template based web authoring, with added ease of dynamic CGI
>scripting is what I think is worth aimi
A French car?
>Scott Rossi wrote:
>
>> My guess is, if you're looking to be able to parse the HTML from any
>> existing Web page, you're in for a thousand and one headaches.
>
>One word: tables.
>
>Okay, two words: nested tables.
>
The thought makes me shiver -:)
OK, here is the first proble
OK, already
>My guess is, if you're looking to be able to parse the HTML from any
>existing Web page, you're in for a thousand and one headaches. One big
>problem I see for you is that with there are multiple ways to describe
>the same layout information. Will you be able to test for the
Scott Rossi wrote:
> My guess is, if you're looking to be able to parse the HTML from any
> existing Web page, you're in for a thousand and one headaches.
One word: tables.
Okay, two words: nested tables.
;)
--
Richard Gaskin
Fourth World Media Corporation
Multimedia Design and Develo
> Is anyone working on a Metacard based browser? I'm just starting on that
> trail, and either I am making some basic mistakes, or it is more complex
> than I thought (as ever).
My guess is, if you're looking to be able to parse the HTML from any
existing Web page, you're in for a thousand and o
Geoff Canyon wrote:
>
> Richard Gaskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said, on 8/4/00 10:12 AM:
>
> >David Bovill at wrote:
> >
> >> Is anyone working on a Metacard based browser? I'm just starting on that
> >> trail, and either I am making some basic mistakes, or it is more complex
> than
> >> I thought (
Richard Gaskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said, on 8/4/00 10:12 AM:
>David Bovill at wrote:
>
>> Is anyone working on a Metacard based browser? I'm just starting on that
>> trail, and either I am making some basic mistakes, or it is more complex
than
>> I thought (as ever).
>
>What would be the advanta
David Bovill at wrote:
> Is anyone working on a Metacard based browser? I'm just starting on that
> trail, and either I am making some basic mistakes, or it is more complex than
> I thought (as ever).
What would be the advantages of a MetaCard-based browser over MSIE or NN?
--
Richard Gaskin
On 14/7/00 5:03 pm, David Bovill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can anyone help with any experience in this area. I can't find any
> documentation on http headers property. I am trying to automate some
> activities which use CGI's to register new customers. The forms take ages to
> fill in, and I'd
18 matches
Mail list logo
