RE: Interconnecting Metacard apps via sockets...

Using different ports per stack could help here... Rest to manage which stack uses which port... Just an idea... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David Bovill Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 16:17 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re:

Re: go stack

Actually I have two questions and, of course, two requests for help. :) I have a go stack it line in a standalone. It refers to another standalone. It doesn't go to the second standalone. If the it variable points to a stack which hasn't been converted to a standalone it works. Is this

Calling all apps!

If you've been to the Apps pages at MetaCard.com http://www.metacard.com/apps.html, you may have noticed that your application isn't there. :) If the true number of shipping apps built with MC were represented on those pages, it would make a very powerful statement about why we all prefer

delete on array elements does not delete key (2.4b4)

Consider the following: put 1 into bob[a] put 1 into bob[b] put the keys of bob a b delete bob[b] put the keys of bob a b I think when you use delete on an array element it should remove the element completely including the key (rather than just deleting the value of the key). Comments?

designers nightmare, and how to avoid it...

Hi folks, can someone give me a clue, what i might do wrong? I am trying to set the FontSmoothing on Win with setregistry. The key is hkey_current_user\control panel\desktop\Fontsmoothing I set tit to 1, if it is something else. The result is empty, so it looks like no error occured. But

Re: delete on array elements does not delete key (2.4b4)

Rodney Tamblyn wrote: I think when you use delete on an array element it should remove the element completely including the key (rather than just deleting the value of the key). Comments? I think the way it works now is more consistent with other structures. For example, you can have an

Re: delete on array elements does not delete key (2.4b4)

I agree, thought I did find a place where I really would have liked delete to erase the key. I used a numerically indexed array as a stack (think state machine) which I wrote push and pop handlers for. Worked nicely, except when I popped off elements I wanted to use extents(myArray) to find

Re: designers nightmare, and how to avoid it...

Klaus Major wrote/ schreef: Do i miss something, or do you really have to set it manually in the control panel Display ??? What is the value after you set it in Display? Regards, Sjoerd Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/metacard@lists.runrev.com/ Info:

good article

http://arstechnica.com/reviews/01q3/metadata/metadata-1.html Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/metacard@lists.runrev.com/ Info: http://www.xworlds.com/metacard/mailinglist.htm Please send bug reports to [EMAIL PROTECTED], not this list.

Re: Cross platform IAC (was: Interconnecting Metacard

From: MisterX [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 08:55:43 +0200 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Interconnecting Metacard apps via sockets... Using different ports per stack could help here... Rest to manage which stack uses which port... Just an

Re: good article

http://arstechnica.com/reviews/01q3/metadata/metadata-1.html Which reminds me: I read articles about the strong points of UNIX, Linux, BSD, Mac OSX or plain, but never came across something similar regarding windows except the number of users. Nevertheless, following the evolution of Linux on

delete on array elements does not delete key

The point here is that delete should delete, rather than just being a shorthand for put empty into in some situations. As far as consistency goes, Jacqueline is at least partially correct. Consider delete with a variable: global largeData globalNames() - list will not include largeData

Re: Digest metacard.v004.n434

-- BEGIN metacard.v004.n434 -- 001 - MisterX [EMAIL PROTECTED] - RE: Interconnecting Metacard apps via sockets... 002 - Rodney Tamblyn rodney@st - delete on array elements does not delete key (2.4b4) 003 - Klaus Major kmajor@metas - designers nightmare, and

Re: delete on array elements does not delete key

Rodney Tamblyn wrote: The point here is that delete should delete, rather than just being a shorthand for put empty into in some situations. I see now. You are looking at the terminology itself rather than the function of the term. I promised not to criticize terminology on the list any

A little troublesome script

Hi gals and guys, Here's a little troublesome script... This is in a button, when pressed, the button hilites itself non-stop forever (the type command I presume) instead of typing the text in the field as expected. Ctrl C doesn't work (yeah, im stuck doing windows). Closing the stack is the