nt: Nov 5, 2017 1:10 AM
>> >To: Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
>> >Subject: [meteorite-list] Enough
>> >
>> >Adam and Jason, if you two want to fight then do it in private. Nobody
>> wants to hear your continuous argument about who’s right and
com> wrote:
> AMEN!
>
> -Original Message-
> >From: Garry Stewart via Meteorite-list meteoritecentral.com>
> >Sent: Nov 5, 2017 1:10 AM
> >To: Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
> >Subject: [meteorite-list] Enough
> >
> >Adam and Jason,
AMEN!
-Original Message-
>From: Garry Stewart via Meteorite-list
>Sent: Nov 5, 2017 1:10 AM
>To: Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
>Subject: [meteorite-list] Enough
>
>Adam and Jason, if you two want to fight then do it in private. Nobody wants
>to hear your cont
Adam and Jason, if you two want to fight then do it in private. Nobody wants to
hear your continuous argument about who’s right and wrong. Give us all a break.
Life is what happens to you while you're busy making other plans. John Lennon
__
Visit our
Speaking of identification, how about a signature or name at the bottom of your
email?
Respectfully,
Steve
Steve Witt
IMCA #9020
http://imca.cc/
From: "plagiok...@arcor.de"
To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Sent: Sunday, June 9, 2013 12:59 PM
Subje
Yeah anything's better than 100% adverts!
m.
-Original Message-
From: meteorite-list-boun...@meteoritecentral.com
[mailto:meteorite-list-boun...@meteoritecentral.com] On Behalf Of Mike Hankey
Sent: 26 August 2009 22:55
To: Michael Blood
Cc: Meteorite List
Subject: Re: [meteorite
.com] On Behalf Of Mike
Hankey
Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 3:55 PM
To: Michael Blood
Cc: Meteorite List
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] ENOUGH Speed-of-light question
i hear ya, and agree about being on topic, but there seems to be a
good bit of interest in this topic, so i'd say let it roll...
t; galaxies !
>
> Skol
> Martin
>
>
>
>
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: meteorite-list-boun...@meteoritecentral.com
> [mailto:meteorite-list-boun...@meteoritecentral.com] Im Auftrag von Michael
> Blood
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 26. August 2009 23:09
>
i hear ya, and agree about being on topic, but there seems to be a
good bit of interest in this topic, so i'd say let it roll...? you can
tell from the subject what its related to, so you can easily delete
the emails without reading them if you're not interested. its kind of
fun / enjoyable for me
: Mittwoch, 26. August 2009 23:09
An: cyna...@charter.net; Meteorite List
Betreff: Re: [meteorite-list] ENOUGH Speed-of-light question
Please guys,
This is not exactly hard core meteorite related.
A few posts - ok - hell, a dozen posts, ok. But this
On and on and on and on is enough
Please guys,
This is not exactly hard core meteorite related.
A few posts - ok - hell, a dozen posts, ok. But this
On and on and on and on is enough already!
Can those few of you obsessed with this take it off
The list, please?
( could be wrong - if there are dozen
My Friends
I would rather read and delete 10 ads than read one more
complaint , whining and petty bickering .
My kids don't cry and complain 1/10 this much .
Not even when they were babies !
So lets grow up a little .
I vote for 2 ads per week with exceptions understanding
thin
--On Mar 12, 2006, at 6:03 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--The consequences would only mean more spam. Corollary spam if you like. By
that rule we are all entitled to a dozen
--retaliatory spams rebutting Steve in the next eleven days. 10 more for me
since I've already used 2. Dean made a good p
The consequences would only be more spam. Corollary spam if you like. By that
rule we are all entitled to a dozen retaliatory spams rebutting Steve in the
next eleven days. 10 more for me since I've already used 2. Dean made a good
point. Just complain to Art.
Bill
Being spammed with anti spam
Dear Bessey Said in Part:
-What do you expect to acompolish by complaining to the
-other 600 list members anyway? I suspect that one is
-trying to make themselves look "holy" as complaining
-to Art would be the actual intelligent thing to do.
My two cents worth:
Perhaps to keep the list fro
I have to say that I am finding this "sucking up" to
art and talking about "respect for him" and such is
very amusing. By publicly spamming the list with
complaints rather than complain to art in private I am
suspicious that certain individuals are trying to make
themselves look "holy" rather than
on 3/12/06 8:22 AM, M come Meteorite Meteorites at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am for 2 AD post for week, one its many few, seen
> for ebay auctions if ended in 3 days...
> Matteo
--
You can be "For" whatever you like, Mateo. However,
this is Art's list, not yours. He makes the rules.
I am for 2 AD post for week, one its many few, seen
for ebay auctions if ended in 3 days...
Matteo
--- Adam Hupe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
> No offense Steve or anybody else,
>
> I just quoted a rule that Art made to prevent the
> List from becoming a
> "Spamfest". If everybody who sal
"Hello, I am Elton, I am a meteorohaulic"
Dear Elton, List;
I am Dave, a stromatolite and meteorohaulic...
Do you think Steve will sell the camera?
Dave F.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Steve Arnold, Chicago!! wrote:
"I seem to remember last year at this time,the jump all over steve arnold
Huh, what's that? More meteorite specimens, Geeze!
Let it go? Let it die and just go!
DF
Steve Arnold, Chicago!! wrote:
I seem to remember last year at this time,the jump all over steve arnold
parade was hitting high pitch fever.Well it seems it is starting again.All
because I send out to ma
Steve Arnold, Chicago!! wrote:
"I seem to remember last year at this time,the jump all over steve arnold
parade was hitting high pitch fever. Well it seems it is starting again."
If it is attacking you the same time every year post Tucson when our
regular bills are coming due in March
Steve.
I am sure there is a "silent majority" like me that enjoy reading your
forsale posts. Keep up the good work and don't let the bashers get you
down.
Mark
From: "Steve Arnold, Chicago!!" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
S
No offense Steve or anybody else,
I just quoted a rule that Art made to prevent the List from becoming a
"Spamfest". If everybody who sales meteorites posted three to six times a
week which has been happening lately with a few people then the List would
become overwhelmed. Art wisely made the r
I seem to remember last year at this time,the jump all over steve arnold
parade was hitting high pitch fever.Well it seems it is starting again.All
because I send out to many posts.This has gotten beat to death.I do not
like it,but I have gotten used to it.Life is is just way to short to let
this g
st been sold as the same thing!
Plain & Simple,
Jeff KuykenI.M.C.A. #3085www.meteorites.com.au
- Original Message -
From:
S.
Ralew
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Meteoryt.net
Sent: Monday, September 13, 2004 11:02
PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Enough is
"therefore better that you of it quiet bushels" probably should read "Therefore, you
better keep your mouth shut."
I think Mauro is using an online translator for converting Italian to English---such
translators often provide amusing results. }=]
__
M
At 11:10 PM 9/12/2004, Mauro Daniel wrote:
therefore better that you of it quiet bushels
Can anyone interpret this for me? I'm in the process of moving right now
and my Captain Super decoder ring is packed away in a box.
Best,
JKG
__
Meteorite-list
The word apparent double standard would apply here. If you feel it is ok
to
pick numbers at random for additional finds when it comes to NWA and not
others, why is this not happening with the Antarctic, Sahara, DAGs, SAUs
and
Dhofars?
just for the sake of clarity, i dont think this is a problem
o: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Adam Hupe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, September 13, 2004 9:40 AM
Subject: Re: AW: [meteorite-list] Enough is Enough, Now NWA 1877
Hello Adam, Stan and List. Adam-I think you missed the point that Stan
and I we
the scientists'
work by making it official.
Adam
- Original Message -
From: "John Birdsell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Adam Hupe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, September 13, 2004 9:40 AM
Subjec
o rare material.
All the best,
Adam
- Original Message -
From: "John Birdsell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "stan ." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, September 13, 2004 8:53 AM
Subject: Re: AW: [meteorite-list] Enough is Enough,
. This one of the reasons I
object strongly when it comes to rare material.
All the best,
Adam
- Original Message -
From: "John Birdsell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "stan ." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, September 13, 2004 8:
Hello Stan and List. Yes, this was exactly the point that we made in an
earlier posting (The Probem with Reductionism ad Infinitum). The
members of this list have not yet received any response from Adam on
this matter and we wonder if he or anyone else have a reasonable
explanation for this a
Regarding the different procedure for e.g. NWA / Gao-Guenie - this issue
was addressed
in an email by Jeff Grossman dated Sept. 9, 2004 (see below).
Gao-Guenie can be treated like Allende or Holbrook in this context as it
doesn't apply to areas of dense meteorite concentration.
but what about
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 13 September 2004 16:13
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [meteorite-list] Enough is Enough, Now NWA 1877
What I do (I know it isn't a cure but will certainly help sometimes to
keep track of the material I own):
If I buy something, I record from whom I bo
riginal Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of mark
ford
Sent: Monday, September 13, 2004 4:38 PM
To: Meteorite List
Subject: RE: [meteorite-list] Enough is Enough, Now NWA 1877
>>Stephan said:
>> snip> ... I think, if a collector buys a slice of a
h
>>Stephan said:
>> snip> ... I think, if a collector buys a slice of a
high-priced meteorite, he has a right to know the exact informations
about
the specimen. >>>
Yeah, I agree with that one, how many of us have paid over large sums
for material, only to get a slice in a plastic bag with no o
-
From: "Meteoryt.net" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, September 13, 2004 12:35 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Enough is Enough, Now NWA 1877
> Hello List
> I can understand that when someone classyfy 200g as NWA4000 then other
> sample
--
> Von: Meteoryt.net [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Gesendet: Montag, 13. September 2004 12:35
> An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Betreff: Re: [meteorite-list] Enough is Enough, Now NWA 1877
>
>
> Hello List
> I can understand that when someone classyfy 200g as NWA4000 then other
>
ight to know the exact informations about
the specimen.
Best regards,
Stefan
Stefan Ralew
SR-Meteorite Collection
Berlin/ Germany
www.meteoriten.com
- Original Message -
From: "Meteoryt.net" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, September 13
CTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, September 13, 2004 12:35 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Enough is Enough, Now NWA 1877
> Hello List
> I can understand that when someone classyfy 200g as NWA4000 then other
> samples above this 200g can be or not the same mate
ryt.net
Sent: Monday, September 13, 2004 12:35 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Enough is Enough, Now NWA 1877
Hello List
I can understand that when someone classyfy 200g as NWA4000 then other
samples above this 200g can be or not the same material.
But where is border beetween meteori
Hello List
I can understand that when someone classyfy 200g as NWA4000 then other
samples above this 200g can be or not the same material.
But where is border beetween meteorites that can be sell without
classification under "similar" NWA numbers and other, than can't be sold
using NWA numbers that
on 9/12/04 11:10 PM, Mauro Daniel at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> better that you of it quiet bushels
-
Well said! (?)
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
its
pass many months.
From: "MARK BOSTICK" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Enough is Enough, Now NWA 1877
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 01:21:20 -0500
Hello All,
Farmer wrote, "Wow, advice from the guy who fakes new Italia
this for close the mouths to a person in this list continue to say fake
informations on this meteorite and on me.
From: "MARK BOSTICK" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Enough is Enough, Now NWA 1877
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 200
Hello All,
Farmer wrote, "Wow, advice from the guy who fakes new Italian meteorite
falls. I think we
can ignore just about anything you say Matteo."
Mauro-Matteo wrote.something, something, new meteorite.
Mark coughs, and accidently pastes the following
http://www.meteoritearticles.com/co
chael Farmer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Mauro Daniel"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Enough is Enough, Now NWA 1877
Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2004 22:56:42 -0700
Wow, advice from the guy
ED]>
Sent: Sunday, September 12, 2004 10:10 PM
Subject: RE: [meteorite-list] Enough is Enough, Now NWA 1877
> if is for this other pieces of olivine digenite its available from the
> moroccan people, but not for this is right copy the complete text of a
> auction and put in anothe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [meteorite-list] Enough is Enough, Now NWA 1877
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 04:14:23 +
Almost forgot, the french also have an olivine diogenite now, around 200g
iirc...
From: "Adam Hupe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [meteorit
Almost forgot, the french also have an olivine diogenite now, around 200g
iirc...
From: "Adam Hupe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [meteorite-list] Enough is Enough, Now NWA 1877
Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2004 19:27:47 -0700
Dear List,
Enough is really
ember 12, 2004 9:27 PM
Subject: [meteorite-list] Enough is Enough, Now NWA 1877
> Dear List,
>
> Enough is really enough, Bob Evans not listening to what was posted by
> people in know is now using the NWA 1877 designation, the number reserved
> for an Olivine Diogenite. We paid for the
Dear List,
Enough is really enough, Bob Evans not listening to what was posted by
people in know is now using the NWA 1877 designation, the number reserved
for an Olivine Diogenite. We paid for the study of this material, reserved
a NWA number for it and made it official by submitting it to the N
Mohamed,
This is my last attempt to appeal to your sense of mathematical
reality. You wrote:
> No, this rock in particular is not magnetic at all. I have another
> suspected lunar breccia (http://www.alifyaa.com/meteorite/ln3/) where
> the bulk is very little magnetic but not the clasts.
> ...
54 matches
Mail list logo