Greetings Listees. I have this nice piece of Felix
in my collection that I purchased a few years back,
and with the receipt it was classified as a CO3.4, but
I looked it up in the book Meteorites from A to Z
which is a marvelous reference book that I use alot,
and it says it is classified as a
- Original Message -
From: Dave Schultz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 2:12 PM
Subject: [meteorite-list] Felix... CO3.2 or CO3.4???
Greetings Listees. I have this nice piece of Felix
in my collection that I purchased a few years back
-list] Felix... CO3.2 or CO3.4???
Greetings Listees. I have this nice piece of Felix
in my collection that I purchased a few years back,
and with the receipt it was classified as a CO3.4, but
I looked it up in the book Meteorites from A to Z
which is a marvelous reference book that I use
Message ---
meteorite-list] Felix... CO3.2 or CO3.4???
Jeff Grossman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wed, 11 Jun 2003 18:38:01 -0400
No way Felix is 3.2. Jones and Scott (1990) had it at
3.2, but more recent data show it to be significantly
higher. Kainsaz is a solid 3.2, and all properties
-list] Felix... CO3.2 or
CO3.4???
Greetings Listees. I have this nice piece of
Felix
in my collection that I purchased a few years
back,
and with the receipt it was classified as a
CO3.4, but
I looked it up in the book Meteorites from A to
Z
which is a marvelous
5 matches
Mail list logo