One is in a 1000XL and the other in a
2200XL. I guess I'll try downgrading to 5.26. They were both at 4.x
previously.
Thanks for your help!
Craig
Quoting Scott Lambert :
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 05:30:25PM -0600, Craig Baird wrote:
A few months ago I upgraded a couple of x86 router
A few months ago I upgraded a couple of x86 routers to RouterOS 6.x,
and have since had something strange happen with both. Out of the
blue, the routers will get into a state where one ethernet port cycles
between no-link and 1Gbps about once per second or two. Rebooting the
router fixes
I have several tower sites where I'm bridging APs. I'm graphing the
individual interfaces in the bridge using Cacti. Looking at the
graphs, they all look very different. If it were truly acting like a
hub, I think you'd see practically the same graph on every interface.
Craig
Quoting T
I don't think that's right. What you're defining is a hub (repeating
everything out every port). MT bridges do learn. In general
networking terms, a switch is considered to be a multiport bridge. In
the MT world, I've always assumed the difference between switching and
bridging to be as
I have two in outdoor boxes on our wireless network. They ran through
the summer with no trouble--Southern Utah desert 95+ degrees almost
every day, often going over 100. Not sure what the temp was in the
boxes, but there is an APC UPS with them, so it would have been pretty
toasty. We a
Exalt ExploreAir, 80 MHz channels. 500 Mbps full duplex.
Plugged into MT at both ends. :)
Craig
Quoting Rick Smith :
no, I'm open ... I'd LIKE to keep mikrotik on both ends of the links.
just need options to consider.
On Feb 7, 2013, at 2:26 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:
Keeping unlicensed?
Thanks Butch. That's what I needed. Looks like the MT documentation
needs to be revised...
Craig
Quoting Butch Evans :
On Mon, 2013-01-21 at 13:47 -0700, Craig Baird wrote:
I have a router that I've configured to do 1:1 NAT, using the
following config:
add action=netmap ch
I have a router that I've configured to do 1:1 NAT, using the
following config:
add action=netmap chain=dstnat disabled=no dst-address= \
in-interface=ftth-vlan5 to-addresses=172.20.2.2
add action=netmap chain=srcnat disabled=no src-address=172.20.2.2 \
to-addresses=
It all works as e
I have seen some devices "leak" DHCP out through the WAN, but not
actually give out any IPs. Specifically, I've seen numerous Cisco PIX
firewalls do it, and I've also seen a couple of Belkin routers behave
this way. They trigger Mikrotik's DHCP alert, but they aren't
actually giving out I
Is it really necessary to have all clocks synced via NTP? Not
doubting you, but I've been running OSPF on my network for years now
without using NTP on my MT routers. Generally everything works
properly. I've occasionally seen issues with two routers syncing up,
but it's generally solved
, Craig Baird wrote:
Quoting Josh Luthman :
Double check that the 493 even has a switch on it.
IIRC, 493Gs have two switch chips.
If you have to do software bridging 130 megs might be a bit much for it.
That's why I'm looking at using the switches rather than bridging.
I'm ho
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Craig Baird wrote:
Quoting Josh Luthman :
Double check that the 493 even has a switch on it.
IIRC, 493Gs have two switch chips.
If you have to do software bridging 130 megs might be a bit much for it.
That'
Quoting Josh Luthman :
Double check that the 493 even has a switch on it.
IIRC, 493Gs have two switch chips.
If you have to do software bridging 130 megs might be a bit much for it.
That's why I'm looking at using the switches rather than bridging.
I'm hoping that using the switches wil
Can anyone comment on the switching capabilities in MT routerboards
such as the 493G? Any gotchas I should be aware of before I try using
it in critical applications? I've been using bridging, but I seem to
be bumping up against a "throughput ceiling" of about 130 Mbps. I'm
trying elimin
just have to live with it for now, or replace MT's
with more reliable hardware.
--
Blake Covarrubias
On Friday, December 9, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Craig Baird wrote:
Yes. When both BGP peers are up and running, the Mikrotiks directly
connected to the Ciscos both have a default route from t
oting "can...@believewireless.net" :
Do the Mikrotiks connected to the BGP routers show they are getting
the default route
from the Cisco they are connected to?
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Craig Baird wrote:
The Ciscos are receiving the default route via BGP from the upst
or OSPF? If via BGP,
make sure you have Redistribute Default Route set in OSPF. Make sure
you don't have a static default route anywhere either.
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 3:21 PM, Craig Baird wrote:
I've got a very weird situation that has come up lately. Wondering if
anyone has any ideas.
I've got a very weird situation that has come up lately. Wondering if
anyone has any ideas. I've got two connections out to the Internet
that enter my network in two different locations. Upstream ISP is the
same on both connections. We run BGP with them via two Cisco edge
routers. They
I have some EoIP tunnels that pass through a router that has some
simple queues for bandwidth control. I don't want the EoIP tunnels to
get throttled, but I have a fall-through simple queue that basically
is supposed to catch everything that doesn't have an explicit rule and
throttle it to
ess learned via DHCP show up as dynamic as well. Do you
have a DHCP client running on ether1 (/ip dhcp-client print)?
-Kristian
On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 13:00 -0700, Craig Baird wrote:
We've got a private school on our network that has an MT router that
we set up for them. For the past two day
We've got a private school on our network that has an MT router that
we set up for them. For the past two days settings have been getting
changed on it causing them not to be able to access the Internet.
Specifically, a second default route has been added to the box
directing traffic to o
A few days ago, I swapped out a Powerrouter that had a couple of bad
ethernet ports for a new one. I did a backup on the old router, and a
restore on the new one to transfer the config over. After installing
the new router, I noticed that the LCD display was suddenly
functional, displayin
That site appears to be down at the moment...
Craig
Quoting Matt Larsen - Lists :
Has anyone here tried this out?
http://cachevideos.com/
I this sounds like a great idea in theory.Interested to see if
it works as well in practice.
Matt Larsen
vistabeam.com
__
So for clarification, does the call come through the hearing impaired
relay operator?
Craig
Quoting Matt Larsen - Lists :
There is a new spam scam targeted at ISPs going around. Someone
uses the TTY system for hearing impaired people (or a forgery of it)
to order up a dialup account an
I've seen similar stuff on occasion. I assume you've already tried
rebooting both routers. Try setting the interface on one side or the
other (or both) to non-broadcast, and specify the neighbor IP in
nbma-neighbor. I've occasionally found this necessary to get OSPF to
work.
Craig
Qu
I have found on numerous occasions that delays of 30 seconds or so can
often be attributed to failing DNS lookups. IOW, if your mail server
is configured to do a reverse DNS lookup on IPs connecting to it, and
if those IPs are not properly reversed, you can get delays like this.
Might be
Is there any way to see ethernet error stats in MT?
Craig
___
Mikrotik mailing list
Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com
http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik
Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik RouterOS
obviously
wouldn't work for the interface settings.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
------
From: "Craig Baird"
Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 12:42 PM
To:
Subject: Re: [Mikrotik] Easiest W
This is one of the few major annoyances I've had with MT since we
switched from StarOS several years ago. With StarOS, if you ever
changed out a card, it would just come up and work. No configs were
lost. Occasionally, we had issues with interfaces getting
re-ordered, but the config was always
to see how it works. Is
it available now?
Craig
Quoting Butch Evans :
On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 11:34 -0700, Craig Baird wrote:
However, as a WISP, our choke point
is not at the edge, but rather at the AP.
More specifically, the choke point is the 802.11 protocol.
If I don't throttle
This is very interesting. I've looked at the NetEQ products before
and thought to myself "wouldn't it be cool if I could toss out all my
customer throttling queues, and just let customers use whatever
bandwidth is available." The NetEQ supposedly allows for this, but
at the same time, protects t
Can anyone tell me if connection tracking must be enabled in order to
use simple queues?
Craig
___
Mikrotik mailing list
Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com
http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik
Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials re
Yep. That works! Thanks for the help, Vegard!
Craig
Quoting Vegard Svanberg :
* Craig Baird [2009-04-13 19:54]:
Is there an easy way to remove a bunch of queues without having to do
individual removes or using a comma separated list? In other words,
let's say I have 500 queues
Is there an easy way to remove a bunch of queues without having to do
individual removes or using a comma separated list? In other words,
let's say I have 500 queues and I want to remove #200 thru #300. Is
there a quick and easy way to do that?
Craig
I've got 1,000+ simple queues that I need to set up. If possible
(because I'm lazy), I would like to put them all on a single core
router. But I'm wondering if a router will choke on that many
queues. It's a PowerRouter, so it's got lots of horsepower, but I
question whether it's a good idea to
I haven't looked on a 411, but I recently was playing with a
Crossroads. By default it was set to NAND first, then network on
NAND fail.
Craig
Quoting Josh Luthman :
Mode? It looks to nand first wouldn't it?
On 3/24/09, Randy Cosby wrote:
Anyone know off the top of their head what the de
Yesterday, I replaced a router running 2.9.51 with one running 3.20.
Since then, I've seen different behavior from a couple of my simple
queues. Specifically, I have something like this:
0 name="proxy-server" target-addresses=10.1.1.1/32
dst-address=0.0.0.0/0 interface=all parent=none
Quoting Josh Luthman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
With x86 it should go in order of PCI slots with onboard being first,
I believe.
The RB532 isn't x86. It's mips. Although I still would think it
would be in order.
How the daughterboard wraps around the other ports is very odd -
maybe the PCI (or e
Good point. Thanks to both of you for your help.
Craig
Quoting Josh Luthman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
With that being the case take note if you have to replace the board
and do a backup/restore!
On 11/7/08, Butch Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 7 Nov 2008, Craig Baird w
I've got something weird going on. I just configured an RB532 with
the RB564 daugterboard. Here's what I'm seeing:
0 R ether1 1500 00:0C:42:0D:58:5D enabled
1 R ether2 1500 00:0C:42:0D:58:5E enabled
2 R ether3 1500 00:0C:4
I can't say anything about the g2 routers either, as I haven't used
them. However, I can tell you that the v8 routers are very solid if
they're running DD-WRT. In fact, if I'm not mistaken, I think they
are the same hardware as the GL except that they have less RAM. We
have deployed over 150 WR
FWIW, we have seen equally good results with the WRT54Gv8 and DD-WRT
as with the WRT54GL. I think the only difference between these two
routers is the amount of RAM they have onboard (16MB vs. 8 MB), so
you have to run the "micro" version on the G. The G is $10 to $20
cheaper than the GL. The o
Use DD-WRT. It works great on WRT54G v8. You have to use the "micro"
version of DD. I'm not sure if you can upgrade a v6 to DD-WRT or not.
You'd need to look at their website.
Craig
Quoting Chris Gotstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Or,
you could try some of the custom firmware out there. We us
How 'bout these:
http://tinyurl.com/4y2ewr
Guys who have used smartBridges gear (you poor souls) will recognize
these.
Craig
Quoting "Aaron, Network Administrator, Great Lakes Internet"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi Everybody:
I'm looking for waterproof Ethernet couplers. Something that I can
Or you could prioritize using the DSCP bits. I know packet8 sets
those, as does Vonage, and (I think) most other VoIP providers. DSCP
has been the most "universal" thing that I have found when trying to
prioritize VoIP. Otherwise you're stuck trying to figure out IPs or
ports for every differen
Nor to the Trango, Smartbridges, or StarOS lists. I don't think he's made
any announcement.
Craig
Quoting Sam Tetherow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
If he made an announcement, it was not posted to the MT or Equipment list.
Sam Tetherow
Sandhills Wireless
Butch Evans wrote:
I hear that Michael may
46 matches
Mail list logo
