[Mikrotik] Policy routing help

I have setup some policy routing at an edge router so that packets from subnet X get one default route and all other packets gets a different default route. This works fine for internet traffic but when trying to get from subnet X to anywhere else on my own network it's broken. If I explicitly add

Re: [Mikrotik] going to the MUM

Nice. This is my first industry conference. Once I heard the MUM was within driving distance I signed up on the spot. -Ty -Ty On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 2:39 PM, Justin Miller wrote: > I’ll be there. > > Justin Miller > VA SkyWire > > > > > On Apr 26, 2016, at 10:32

[Mikrotik] going to the MUM

Who else is going to be at the MUM in Dallas this week? I'm heading up there tomorrow morning. It' s my first industry conference and I'm looking forward to putting some faces to names. -Ty -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Re: [Mikrotik] Script to monitor ethernet interface speed

I don't have a clue but I would love if you'd share the finished result. That would be very useful. -Ty -Ty On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 1:22 PM, Christopher Tyler wrote: > I'm in need of a little scripting assistance. I'm trying to write a router > script that gets the current link speed of all t

Re: [Mikrotik] Rb750r2 only 16 MB of storage?

Wow, seriously? That seems like a major oversite. -Ty -Ty On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 3:18 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: > How are you supposed to upgrade??? There's only about 5 MB left after the > OS. You can't uninstall any packages. > > > /sys resource print >uptime: 1m >

Re: [Mikrotik] Traffic generator

I started there, yes. -Ty On Sep 4, 2015 5:08 PM, "Chupaka" wrote: > Have you checked > > http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:Performance_Testing_with_Traffic_Generator > ? > > -- > Подпись: > (добавляется в конце всех исходящих писем) > > 2015-09-04 21

[Mikrotik] Traffic generator

How the heck do I use this thing? I just want to do a bandwidth test. -Ty -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: ___ M

Re: [Mikrotik] Multihomed - BGP + OSPF

d to make sure your costs divide the network the same > way you are doing with your BGP routes. > There are other ways to do this that I am sure other folks will share, but > this one does work. > > > On 8/31/2015 2:54 PM, Ty Featherling wrote: > >> I use OSPF to h

Re: [Mikrotik] Multihomed - BGP + OSPF

at different points in your network? > > > > > - > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > > > Midwest Internet Exchange > http://www.midwest-ix.com > > > ----- Original Message - > > From: "Ty Feather

[Mikrotik] Multihomed - BGP + OSPF

I use OSPF to hand internal routing and BGP to talk to my provider. I just turned up a second circuit on the network so naturally I would like to be able to route some subnets through one connection and others through the other with either failing over should one connection go down. I get that I ca

Re: [Mikrotik] Traffic pauses on 2011UiAS

I have seen this behavior in Winbox many times. Freaked me out until I realized it was not really happening just a display glitch. -Ty On Aug 29, 2015 9:23 AM, "Terri Kelley" wrote: > @Mike > I will try the CLI, didn’t think of that. > > @Scott > Counters on all interfaces go to zero. > Winbox a

Re: [Mikrotik] VPN Android to ROS

ault-profile=default-encryption > > /ip firewall nat > add action=masquerade chain=srcnat src-address=192.168.99.0/24 > out-interface=! > > > > On 08/21/2015 03:54 PM, Ty Featherling wrote: > >> Okay that sounds easy. Yes, Sam, if you have a config happy I will gl

Re: [Mikrotik] VPN Android to ROS

Okay that sounds easy. Yes, Sam, if you have a config happy I will gladly accept it. -Ty On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 2:24 PM, Scott Lambert wrote: > On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 02:19:34PM -0500, Ty Featherling wrote: > > Has anyone gotten a VPN to work from their Android device to a Mikr

[Mikrotik] VPN Android to ROS

Has anyone gotten a VPN to work from their Android device to a Mikrotik? I searched the forums and only find people complaining about how it doesn't work and how stupid Mikrotik is. -Ty -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Re: [Mikrotik] simple BGP

NETWORK prefix=NETWORK/CIDR > prefix-length=CIDR_MASK > add action=discard chain=PROVIDER_IN match-chain=MY_NETWORK > add action=accept chain=PROVIDER_OUT match-chain=MY_NETWORK > add action=discard chain=PROVIDER_OUT > > > > On 08/21/2015 09:32 AM, Ty Featherling wrote: > >>

Re: [Mikrotik] simple BGP

Make sure you set up your filters too. > > > > -- > > Christopher Tyler > > MTCRE/MTCNA/MTCTCE/MTCWE > > Total Highspeed Internet Services > > 417.851.1107 > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Ty Featherling" > > To: "Mikrotik discus

Re: [Mikrotik] simple BGP

gt; Basically what you said. > Setup the session and put the advertised net in Networks. > You can do a route filter to stop anything you don't want, but ask the > upstream to only send the default. > > > On 8/21/2015 10:32 AM, Ty Featherling wrote: > >> What is the b

[Mikrotik] simple BGP

What is the bare minimum necessary to turn up BGP on a Tik router? I just need to establish a session, accept default routes, and advertise one /24 subnet. -Ty -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Re: [Mikrotik] POE *out* products

I have 3 of them. Haven't deployed just yet though. -Ty On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 11:32 PM, Mike Hammett wrote: > It was added to RouterBoard.com on February 2nd. That said, the first > three places all have it on pre-order still. > > > > > - > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions >

Re: [Mikrotik] Split-horizon on CRS125

er4 horizon=1 > > > /interface bridge port add bridge=mybridge interface=ether5 horizon=1 > > > > > > Traffic from any port with horizon 'x' won't go back to any other port > on > > > that bridge with horizon 'x'. > > > -Original

[Mikrotik] Split-horizon on CRS125

Does anyone have a sample config that shows split-horizon setup? I would like port-isolation on my CRS125s. If it matters I have all ports in a bridge save for the upstream port. Doing some simple routing. -Ty -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Re: [Mikrotik] A stable version 6

Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Ty Featherling > wrote: > > > Fine then. Be that way. :P > > > > -Ty > > On Nov 25, 2014 11:26 AM, "

Re: [Mikrotik] A stable version 6

Fine then. Be that way. :P -Ty On Nov 25, 2014 11:26 AM, "Josh Luthman" wrote: > Thanks guys. I think I'll start with 6.22 since it's the latest and it got > not only one but two endorsements! > > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy,

Re: [Mikrotik] A stable version 6

I have been running 6.15 on all of my CCRs, CRSs, and a couple of RB450s. I do all of the things you are talking about without issue. I just tried 6.20 on a CRS and it dropped packets like crazy. Stay off of that one for sure. -Ty On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 10:56 AM, Josh Luthman wrote: > I've got

Re: [Mikrotik] Portions of config not being loaded

Does the config you are pasting include mac addresses? If so you need to remove them. -Ty On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 11:07 AM, Roy, Jerry wrote: > How do I get to it after a factory reset? Mac-telnet is not allowing me to > paste. > > Winbox via mac works but pasting keeps disconnecting the termin

Re: [Mikrotik] Throughput Problem on Mikrotik RB951

I run a first-gen 2011 wireless model at home for my personal router. I get 25-30mbps down and 15-20mbps upload no problem. Was this an issue with the later model or just a hit-or miss issue? -Ty On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 4:38 PM, Paul McCall wrote: > We tried changing flow control to ON and AUTO

Re: [Mikrotik] local access to a NAT'ted address

> http://gregsowell.com/?p=4242 > > > Bryon > > -Original Message- > From: mikrotik-boun...@mail.butchevans.com > [mailto:mikrotik-boun...@mail.butchevans.com] On Behalf Of Ty Featherling > Sent: Monday, April 28, 2014 4:15 PM > To: Mikrotik discussions > Su

Re: [Mikrotik] local access to a NAT'ted address

ct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > > On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 3:08 PM, Ty Featherling >wrote: > > > Like so? > > > > /ip firewall nat > > add action=dst-nat chain=dstnat dst-address=207.235.20.132 in-interface=\ > >

Re: [Mikrotik] local access to a NAT'ted address

n Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 5:00 PM, Butch Evans wrote: > On 04/28/2014 03:15 PM, Ty Featherling wrote: > >> No dice. No packets even hit that rule. >> > > It needs to be above this rule: > > add action=src-nat chain=srcnat src-address=192.168.0.0/24 to-addresses=\ >

Re: [Mikrotik] local access to a NAT'ted address

t; > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > > On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 4:01 PM, Ty Featherling >wrote: > > > Here is what I have right now. > > > > /ip address > >

Re: [Mikrotik] local access to a NAT'ted address

OH 45373 > > > On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 3:53 PM, Ty Featherling >wrote: > > > I have a server on my LAN here that I am 1:1 natting behind a public > > address. The srcNAT + dstNAT rules are working wonderfully but I find > when > > I try to access the server on

[Mikrotik] local access to a NAT'ted address

I have a server on my LAN here that I am 1:1 natting behind a public address. The srcNAT + dstNAT rules are working wonderfully but I find when I try to access the server on it's public address from within my LAN I can't reach it. From outside it works fine. It there another rule I need to allow t

Re: [Mikrotik] RouterOS 6.x ARP bug

wrote: > > > > > Oh, you mean IP scan? I thought I missed something. So, what did you do > > to > > > clear up ARP? > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 9:05 AM, Ty Featherling < > tyfeatherl...@gmail.com > > > >wrote: &g

Re: [Mikrotik] RouterOS 6.x ARP bug

RP? > > > On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 9:05 AM, Ty Featherling >wrote: > > > There is a ping scan tool in routeros. You could script it to run > > periodically. > > > > I may have found an easier fix though. I scripted the router to clear arp > > every hour.

Re: [Mikrotik] RouterOS 6.x ARP bug

too? > > Tushar > > > > On Apr 5, 2014, at 8:05 AM, Ty Featherling > wrote: > > > > There is a ping scan tool in routeros. You could script it to run > > periodically. > > > > I may have found an easier fix though. I scripted the router to clear arp

Re: [Mikrotik] RouterOS 6.x ARP bug

have run ping scanner when it > happens and it clears up things on the offending subnet. > > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 12:36 PM, Ty Featherling >wrote: > > > I wonder if a ping scan run from the router will update that entry? > > > > -Ty > > > > >

Re: [Mikrotik] RouterOS 6.x ARP bug

I wonder if a ping scan run from the router will update that entry? -Ty On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 11:34 AM, RickG wrote: > Same here. No DHCP. > > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 9:21 AM, Ty Featherling >wrote: > > > I thought of that, but the DHCP server isn'

Re: [Mikrotik] RouterOS 6.x ARP bug

ng anything fancy with the CCR but this is exactly the bug I'm >> experiencing. When I switch over to my 1100 the issues go away. I hope >> Mikrotik gets this fixed soon! Thanks for the post! >> >> >> On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 2:57 PM, Ty Featherling >> wro

[Mikrotik] RouterOS 6.x ARP bug

After scratching my head for a day I just figured out what is causing these support calls where nothing seems wrong except the user cannot get online. Turns out the CCR I have routing this part of the network is experiencing a bug in the ARP table. For whatever reason, customers would get an IP ass

Re: [Mikrotik] NTP primary vs secondary

They are backwards each time. Both Ciscos ate set to the same sources so strata should be the same but I will check. -Ty On Mar 31, 2014 5:39 PM, "Scott Lambert" wrote: > On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 03:02:37PM -0500, Ty Featherling wrote: > > I just went through my routers and w

[Mikrotik] NTP primary vs secondary

I just went through my routers and was changing the NTP client settings. I have NTP servers on both of my edge Cisco routers. I added both as primary and secondary on all routers making sure to put the nearer router as primary on every one. Time and again I kept seeing the client report that it got

Re: [Mikrotik] VLAN setup

in software? > > -- > Blake Covarrubias > > On Mar 21, 2014, at 3:58 PM, Ty Featherling > wrote: > > > Thank you. I forgot to say I will be adding a trunk port on ether2 so I > > wanted to be prepared to do so. > > > > -Ty > > On Mar 21, 2014 4:

Re: [Mikrotik] VLAN setup

50 > add bridge=bridgeACCESS-51 interface=vlan51 > add bridge=bridgeACCESS-50 interface=sfp2 > add bridge=bridgeACCESS-50 interface=sfp3 > add bridge=bridgeACCESS-50 interface=sfp4 > add bridge=bridgeACCESS-51 interface=ether1 > > -- > Подпись: > (добавляется в конце всех исход

Re: [Mikrotik] BGP guidance

; > > - > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > ----- Original Message - > > From: "Ty Featherling" > To: "Mikrotik discussions" > Sent: Friday, March 21, 2014 4:26:22 PM > Subject: Re: [Mikrotik]

Re: [Mikrotik] BGP guidance

re working on it. I take defaults or > default + upstream's customers. But that's just personal preference. > > > - Original Message - > > > > From: "Ty Featherling" > > To: "Mikrotik discussions" > > Sent: Friday, March 21, 2014 11:10:32 AM

[Mikrotik] VLAN setup

I am replacing a Cisco 2950 with a CCR1036. I will have sfp1 connected to an incoming trunk carrying VLANs 50 and 51. I need sfp2, 3, an 4 setup as ACCESS VLAN 50 and ether1 as ACCESS VLAN 51. Does this look right? /interface bridge add l2mtu=1590 name=bridgeACCESS-50 add name=bridgeACCESS-51 add

Re: [Mikrotik] SFP modules

Well that sucks. -Ty On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 3:57 PM, Scott Reed wrote: > Failed either way for me. > Well, it linked, but we never received any packets. > > > On 3/21/2014 4:31 PM, Ty Featherling wrote: > >> I just had this problem setting up a CCR today. Make

Re: [Mikrotik] SFP modules

I just had this problem setting up a CCR today. Make sure you enable auto-negotiation. By default it was disabled on the SFP ports on the CCR but not on a CRS. I was scratching my head until I found that. -Ty On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 3:25 PM, Scott Reed wrote: > We tried to replace a 2011 with

Re: [Mikrotik] Mikrotik Digest, Vol 75, Issue 17

e edit your Subject line so it is more specific > > than "Re: Contents of Mikrotik digest..." > > > > > > Today's Topics: > > > > 1. Re: BGP guidance (Ty Featherling) > > 2. Re: BGP guidance (Josh Luthman) > > > > > &g

Re: [Mikrotik] BGP guidance

s on all providers. > Increase backhauls if necessary. > > > > > - > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > ----- Original Message - > > From: "Ty Featherling" > To: "Mikrotik discussions" &g

Re: [Mikrotik] BGP guidance

ave the hardware for full, do it. > > > > Do you know the differences? > > > > Josh Luthman > > Office: 937-552-2340 > > Direct: 937-552-2343 > > 1100 Wayne St > > Suite 1337 > > Troy, OH 45373 > > On Mar 21, 2014 11:56 AM, "Ty Feat

Re: [Mikrotik] BGP guidance

ons" > Sent: Friday, March 21, 2014 11:00:39 AM > Subject: Re: [Mikrotik] BGP guidance > > If you have the hardware for full, do it. > > Do you know the differences? > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337

Re: [Mikrotik] BGP guidance

looking for. -Ty On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 11:00 AM, Josh Luthman wrote: > If you have the hardware for full, do it. > > Do you know the differences? > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > On Mar 2

Re: [Mikrotik] BGP guidance

; That will make things more complicated if you advertise space out of >> both routers. If one goes down, all inbound traffic will start coming in >> through the other router, whether you want it or not. >> >> On 3/20/2014 8:07 AM, Ty Featherling wrote: >> >>

Re: [Mikrotik] BGP guidance

Thank you. For this setup I should only need default routes from both upstreams, yes? -Ty On Mar 20, 2014 3:42 PM, "Blake Covarrubias" wrote: > On Mar 20, 2014, at 5:52 AM, Casey Mills wrote: > > > It has been a while since I set one of these up... But when I did this > > there wasn't a need to

Re: [Mikrotik] BGP guidance

t. > > On 3/20/2014 8:07 AM, Ty Featherling wrote: > >> Yes I have started the process with both upstreams. I do intend to spend >> some time on filters as well, thanks. >> >> Mike, the two networks each have 300Mbps feeds to the internet but only >> 100Mbps

Re: [Mikrotik] BGP guidance

mess. > > Casey > > > On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 10:30 PM, Mike Hammett >wrote: > > > That would work, but I'm not sure no service is better than slow service. > > > > > > > > > > - > > Mike Hammett > > Intelligent Computing

Re: [Mikrotik] BGP guidance

out provider B. Traffic will prefer the > /19 until that provider fails. > > > > - > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > - Original Message - > > From: "Ty Featherling" > To: "Mikrotik disc

Re: [Mikrotik] BGP guidance

Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > - Original Message - > > From: "Ty Featherling" > To: "Mikrotik discussions" > Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2014 2:11:43 PM > Subject: [Mikrotik] BGP guidance > > I am ready to

Re: [Mikrotik] BGP guidance

Thank you. -Ty On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 3:26 PM, Blake Covarrubias wrote: > Yes, that sounds correct. > > -- > Blake Covarrubias > > On Mar 19, 2014, at 12:11 PM, Ty Featherling > wrote: > > > I am ready to begin turning up BGP on both of my edge routers and sta

[Mikrotik] BGP guidance

I am ready to begin turning up BGP on both of my edge routers and start advertising my new IPv4 assignment. I am want to make sure I understand things clearly first. These were setup as two separate networks, each with their own upstream. We built out between them and got a backhaul between the tw

Re: [Mikrotik] Blocking dhcp servers from customer, but not client

I have done the same on UBNT bridged radios with a rule dropping udp port 67 on the eth port for the customer radio or the WLAN on the AP. -Ty On Mar 3, 2014 7:28 PM, "Ty Featherling" wrote: > I have a single rule on my tower routers that drops udp source port 67 > with an

Re: [Mikrotik] Blocking dhcp servers from customer, but not client

I have a single rule on my tower routers that drops udp source port 67 with an IN interface of bridgeLAN which is the bridge my APs are in and also the bridge my DHCP server runs. Works a treat. -Ty On Mar 3, 2014 5:23 PM, "Josh Luthman" wrote: > Canopy can certainly block bootp servers and let

Re: [Mikrotik] Deleting lots of IPs from address-list

I made that mistake once capturing all ips that attempted SMTP to port 25 on my mail server. I didn't set them to time out either. Luckily I had Winbox open for a while and noticed I was over 200 ips in less than an hour! I removed that rule and praised my foresight to block that traffic. -Ty On F

Re: [Mikrotik] Deleting lots of IPs from address-list

Can you create a new address-list and put in it only what you want to the there? then you can change the names of the address-lists to put the old one out and the new one in. -Ty On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 9:53 AM, Josh Luthman wrote: > About 3.2 million addresses. I didn't set an expiration... >

Re: [Mikrotik] OSPF "problem" situation #1

"Mikrotik will happily speak OSPF PTP on multiple networks on one interface. That is something I've taken advantage of when changing routers at key locations. It would not work with a Cisco in the mix." THANK YOU for saying this. I just discovered this limitation on Cisco the other day. I am jus

Re: [Mikrotik] OSPF "problem" situation #1

If you are concerned that the wireless link is fouling up the OSPF messages then you might try an EOIP tunnel between the routers. I haven't tried it but I have heard many people on this list recommend it as a fix. -Ty On Feb 25, 2014 9:17 PM, "Paul McCall" wrote: > Bill, > > Thanks for the sugg

Re: [Mikrotik] Bridge Ports showing with an S on version 6.7

truly acting like a hub, I think > you'd see practically the same graph on every interface. > > Craig > > > Quoting Ty Featherling : > > When I implemented the "port isolation" rule I posted earlier. I logged >> the >> traffic first to make sure

Re: [Mikrotik] Bridge Ports showing with an S on version 6.7

When I implemented the "port isolation" rule I posted earlier. I logged the traffic first to make sure I was not blocking anything I didn't intend. The only traffic I saw was broadcast based; EGMP, UBNT Discovery, CDP, etc. This doesn't rule out the switching function of a bridge since this traffic

Re: [Mikrotik] Bridge Ports showing with an S on version 6.7

Bueller? -Ty On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 10:26 AM, Bill Prince < part...@skylinebroadbandservice.com> wrote: > The software bridge used to operate like a hub, and according to some > reports that we've gotten, the switch chip also operated like a hub. > > However, I have heard through the rumor mill

Re: [Mikrotik] cpu spikes on Mikrotik router

Looks like the Management profile is consuming the cycles. What could that be? -Ty On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 1:08 PM, Ty Featherling wrote: > I just found the profile tool. I am watching it now and waiting for > another spike. > > -Ty > > > On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 12:47 PM, Ty

Re: [Mikrotik] cpu spikes on Mikrotik router

I just found the profile tool. I am watching it now and waiting for another spike. -Ty On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 12:47 PM, Ty Featherling wrote: > What the hell is this madness? > > This is an RB450G as a tower router with backhaul in ether1 and the rest > of the ports bridged.

Re: [Mikrotik] cpu spikes on Mikrotik router

I just found that tool. Looking now and waiting for the next spike. -Ty On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 1:06 PM, Scott Reed wrote: > Tools->Profile > What is using the cycles? > > > On 2/4/2014 1:47 PM, Ty Featherling wrote: > >> What the hell is this madness? >> >&

[Mikrotik] cpu spikes on Mikrotik router

What the hell is this madness? This is an RB450G as a tower router with backhaul in ether1 and the rest of the ports bridged. A handful of static routes, a few filter rules. This same config is used on many other routers but this one is exhibiting this CPU behavior. It does not seem to correlate w

Re: [Mikrotik] Bridge Ports showing with an S on version 6.7

Yeah but why? Some updated functionality of bridge involving the switch chip? -Ty On Feb 3, 2014 11:24 AM, "Justin Miller" wrote: > It's normal in 6. It's a new feature. A port in a bridge will have a S now > on all devices. > > > On Feb 3, 2014, at 10:38 AM, Paul McCall wrote: > > > First time

Re: [Mikrotik] Possible to disable switch in RB450?

*all not avg, sorry. On Jan 30, 2014 8:44 PM, "Ty Featherling" wrote: > Set avg port to master=none. 3-5 are slaves to ether2 by default. You can > reset without default config as well. > > -Ty > On Jan 30, 2014 8:42 PM, "Mike Lyon" wrote: > >>

Re: [Mikrotik] Possible to disable switch in RB450?

Set avg port to master=none. 3-5 are slaves to ether2 by default. You can reset without default config as well. -Ty On Jan 30, 2014 8:42 PM, "Mike Lyon" wrote: > Howdy, > > Is it possible to disable the switching chip in the RB450 and use all > ports as individual IP interfaces? > > Thanks, > Mi

Re: [Mikrotik] DHCP server + Firewall

No. Purely academic. -Ty On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 4:32 PM, Justin Miller wrote: > That is an interesting question. Do you think you'll have enough DHCP > traffic to care? > > Justin > On Jan 28, 2014, at 3:18 PM, Ty Featherling > wrote: > > > Now the more fu

Re: [Mikrotik] DHCP server + Firewall

Now the more fun question is how is that router-sourced traffic managed in queues? Does it receive the highest priority or can you use mangle to mark and mange it further. -Ty On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 2:15 PM, Ty Featherling wrote: > That has been my experience with the testing I have d

Re: [Mikrotik] DHCP server + Firewall

may have changed in ROS 6. YMMV in 6. > > Justin > On Jan 23, 2014, at 12:13 PM, Ty Featherling > wrote: > > > Can someone confirm that you CANNOT manage traffic FROM the DHCP Server > on > > a Mikrotik with IP Firewall? > > > > To test this I added the rule

Re: [Mikrotik] DHCP server + Firewall

MT, wouldn't the > chain need to be forward and not output? > > > On 01/24/2014 08:54 AM, Ty Featherling wrote: > >> Chupaka and Butch. This rule is on a router that has a bridge for LAN >> ports >> and the DHCP server is run on that bridge. Use IP Filter is enab

Re: [Mikrotik] DHCP server + Firewall

ce) and use bridge filter (or enable > 'use-ip-firewall'). > > -- > Подпись: > (добавляется в конце всех исходящих писем) > > > 2014/1/24 Butch Evans > > > On 01/23/2014 11:13 AM, Ty Featherling wrote: > > > >> Can someone confirm th

[Mikrotik] DHCP server + Firewall

Can someone confirm that you CANNOT manage traffic FROM the DHCP Server on a Mikrotik with IP Firewall? To test this I added the rule: add action=log chain=output disabled=no protocol=udp src-port=67 Nothing is caught. -Ty -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed.

Re: [Mikrotik] Open Port 16000-32000 only if Connection to 554 is established

Can one rule match both the port/protocol and connection state? If so you need one rule to match port 554/established and add to address list and then a rule above that to allow traffic to the ports you like if they are in that address list. -Ty On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 5:10 PM, Tayeb Meftah wrot

Re: [Mikrotik] Bridging

Just checked.. 6.1 -Ty On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 10:48 AM, RickG wrote: > Maybe my issue is firmware. Ty, what version are you running on your CCR? > > > On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Ty Featherling >wrote: > > > Software bridge. As far as I know I can get bet

Re: [Mikrotik] Bridging

gt; So you can access all devices from one port to another for every port? > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 6:00 PM, Ty Featherling > >wrote: > > > > > Could be. I just turned up a CCR a couple of weeks ago that is bridging > > all > > > port

Re: [Mikrotik] Bridging

Could be. I just turned up a CCR a couple of weeks ago that is bridging all ports for now. No issues yet. -Ty On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 4:47 PM, RickG wrote: > Just an update, I moved the AP's off the bridged port on the CCR and all > radios are now remotely accessible. A flaw in the bridging on

[Mikrotik] CRS switches

Anyone tried out the new Cloud series switches? Since they are running ROS L5 it seems like they might be a good tower router where I have been using 493Gs or 2011s. They are comparable spec-wise except the 493 has more memory. If they would work in my deployment I can't see why, for the price, I w

Re: [Mikrotik] Cable source

DoubleRadius found this one for me a few weeks ago. Didn't end up using it but here you go. "Shireen CAT5e Sheilded & GelFilled Bulk Cable 1000'. The DC-1041 will feature a double outer jacket, 4 Twisted pairs of 24 AWG wire with Al foil shielding and drain wire with LDPE + Gel. Excellent for use

Re: [Mikrotik] RB493G voltage reporting

Reed wrote: > The BaseII SiteMonitor will give you the voltage as is. The shunt is for > current. > Just use the same supply for it as the RBs and you will know what voltage > the RBs are running. > > > On 8/8/2013 2:13 PM, Ty Featherling wrote: > >> That is the conc

Re: [Mikrotik] RB493G voltage reporting

That is the conclusion I came to as well. If I really need to know I will install a shunt for my SiteMonitor. -Ty On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 12:34 PM, Vegard Svanberg wrote: > * Ty Featherling [2013-08-08 17:56]: > > > I wish I could calibrate it. I will just have to make a no

Re: [Mikrotik] RB493G voltage reporting

at far off, but I have several 433AH that report 24.1 or lower and 3" > away at the terminal block I measure 24.8 to 25. > > > On 8/8/2013 9:34 AM, Ty Featherling wrote: > >> I have a box I am building out and I just powered everything up for the >> first time. All is

[Mikrotik] RB493G voltage reporting

I have a box I am building out and I just powered everything up for the first time. All is well except the 493G being powered via a packetflux poe injector being fed 24V reports it's voltage as 18.3V. I verified that the POE is in fact putting out 24V so what gives? Is there a voltage regulator on

Re: [Mikrotik] Winbox update in the works?

Do you me the Dude? Winbox is the router config/management utility. -Ty On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 3:10 PM, Jerry Roy wrote: > Hi all, > > Does anyone know if MT has plans to add new functionality to Winbox any > time soon? Do they have any sort of roadmap that is available for review? I > REALLY

Re: [Mikrotik] Mikrotik template for Cacti

Do you mean traffic graphs? I just use the generic SNMP host template. Works fine for that. -Ty On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 3:40 PM, Kevin Pesenecker wrote: > Hi Butch, > > > > I was wondering if you had a good resource for some basic Cacti templates > that would monitor the data rate going over ea

Re: [Mikrotik] Automatic config backup

Hahaha. You know that is going to come up again in the future. -Ty On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 4:59 PM, Eric Muehleisen wrote: > Damn it! I told you to forget that I said that > > On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 4:58 PM, Josh Luthman >wrote: > > > Duh...6 is less than 12... > > > > Josh Luthman > > Office:

Re: [Mikrotik] Automatic config backup

Found that app. I will link it here in case someone needs it. http://gregsowell.com/?p=1264 -Ty On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Jacob Heider wrote: > I've been using RANCID with the community MikroTik patch for years with > fantastic results. I wouldn't run any network without RANCID. > > Eric

Re: [Mikrotik] Automatic config backup

I use a windows app made by Greg Sowell. It ssh's into each box and does an export. I have daily backups of all my routers that way. I can dig up a link if needed. -Ty On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 3:13 PM, Jerry Roy wrote: > Hi Rick, > > Your script would be kindly appreciated here as well. > > Thank

Re: [Mikrotik] reset rb493

For posterity, this was a 493AH. -Ty On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 8:07 AM, Ty Featherling wrote: > Thanks for the help guys. Shorting the jumper "pads" on the board and > booting up reset it for me. > > -Ty > > > On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 10:19 PM, Josh Luthman < &g

Re: [Mikrotik] reset rb493

yne St Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > On Jan 21, 2013 11:18 PM, "Butch Evans" wrote: > > > On Mon, 2013-01-21 at 14:45 -0600, Ty Featherling wrote: > > > I am trying like hell to reset a couple of used RB493s I have here. I > > have > > > tr

  1   2   >