On Fri, 2 Apr 2004, jean-marc pouchoulon wrote:
I 'd like also to ask our ldap server with perl-ldap , if a user exist
before accepting mail. If someone did it
That's actually quite simple, but depends on your local setup.
I guess, your users uses unique account names, usually storred in
Peter,
I've also had to do some very specific permission changes as
the UNIX socket files are also placed into this directory,
and changing the perm's on them gives the old unsafe socket
error with sendmail.
Yes, that's why I have a completely separate quarantine folder, plus on a busy
On Mon, 05 Apr 2004 10:53:32 +0100
Paul Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter,
Yes, that's why I have a completely separate quarantine folder, plus on a busy
server where you are quarantining a lot of large messages, in theory the
quarantine could fill the disk and kill the mail system.
On Mon, 05 Apr 2004 10:53:32 +0100
Paul Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter,
Yes, that's why I have a completely separate quarantine folder, plus on a busy
server where you are quarantining a lot of large messages, in theory the
quarantine could fill the disk and kill the mail system.
Pete,
Excellent, thanks for the update. If you find any problems with the system, or
have any requests for additional features, let me know - I've started a list,
and will implement some/all of them eventually. All I would count out at the
moment is displaying the decoded attachments, as this
Anyone get MIMEDefang running with FreeBSD 4.8? I installed it from the ports
collection and I am trying to get it running but when I try to send a test message I
get the following error in /var/log/maillog:
Apr 5 08:39:07 altair mimedefang-multiplexor: Starting slave 0 (pid 210) (1 running):
My free disk space is limited right now, therefore I thought if I can
scan
for viruses and reject if found before quarantining based on bad file
types, it would save on disk space. Yes it uses a bit more processor
power, but my greylisting has made a big difference keeping that
Mike Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Apr 5 08:39:07 altair mimedefang-multiplexor: Slave 0 stderr: Can't locate
warnings.pm in @INC (@INC contains:
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.005/i386-freebsd
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.005 . /usr/libdata/perl/5.00503/mach
I didn't appreciate that stream_by_recipient causes mail
to be accepted before the validity of the recipient addresses
has been checked. It seems that if any of the recipient
addresses are invalid, instead of errors being generated at
the original rcpt to phase, they don't show up until the
On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 08:40:26AM -0500, Mike Carlson wrote:
Anyone get MIMEDefang running with FreeBSD 4.8? I installed it from
the ports collection and I am trying to get it running but when I try
to send a test message I get the following error in /var/log/maillog:
Apr 5 08:39:07 altair
On Mon, 5 Apr 2004, Jim Hatfield wrote:
I didn't appreciate that stream_by_recipient causes mail
to be accepted before the validity of the recipient addresses
has been checked.
Actually, this is a milter issue. There is no way for Sendmail to tell
a milter that a recipient address is
I want to block the extensions that I have banned, but I do not want to
block or alter (the current default behavior) extensions with trailing
dots on the end.
Can I just edit this line to do what I want:
$re = '\.' . $bad_exts . '\.*$';
If not, please tell me what to edit.
Thanks
Mark
Looking for a copy of the scripts this thread speaks of, perhaps I can help
work out some of the required features... this seems like a viable project to
get going. I need to write my own package to manage quarantined attachments
and/or emails, and figured rather than try re-inventing the
Any idea what could be causing this?
Christoph Martin said:
I just upgraded mimedefang from 2.39 to 2.40 on four of my
machines. On all the boxes I have nearly the same mimedefang-filter
using for instance action_add_header(X-Spam-Flag, YES); to add
headers to the mails in filter_end. On ONE
On Mon, 5 Apr 2004, Mark Penkower wrote:
Is it possible to test a new filter to see if it works (perhaps using a
test email account) before putting it into production and reloading the
rules?
mimedefang.pl -f test-filter -test
-Justin
___
Visit
Everything I've read about DSPAM mentions that it is harder to setup then sa.
Note, DSPAM still needs to be trained...and including it in the SA
framework allows it to be trained by SA.
The best option imo is just to wait for it to be included as a plugin for
SA 3.0.
On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at
Nathan,
See http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/pipermail/mimedefang/2004-April/021509.html
Best Wishes,
Paul.
__
Paul Murphy
Head of Informatics
Ionix Pharmaceuticals Ltd
418 Science Park, Cambridge, CB4 0PA
Tel. 01223 433741
Fax. 01223 433788
On 5 Apr 2004 at 16:25, Jan Pieter Cornet wrote:
On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 08:40:26AM -0500, Mike Carlson wrote:
Anyone get MIMEDefang running with FreeBSD 4.8? I installed it from
the ports collection and I am trying to get it running but when I try
to send a test message I get the
On Mon, 5 Apr 2004, Ray Spinhirne wrote:
Apr 5 11:21:28 acad mimedefang[21024]: Could not create mdefang
directory in /var/spool/MIMEDefang: File exists
We are running a pretty old (2.16) version of Mimedefang in
non multiplexor mode but it worked fine before this. It's a production
This morning, I received this text in a message:
WARNING: This e-mail has been altered by MIMEDefang. Following this
paragraph are indications of the actual changes made. For more
information about your site's MIMEDefang policy, contact
Mark Penkower [EMAIL PROTECTED]. For more information
On Mon, 5 Apr 2004, Ray Spinhirne wrote:
Apr 5 11:21:28 acad mimedefang[21024]: Could not create mdefang
directory in /var/spool/MIMEDefang: File exists
We are running a pretty old (2.16) version of Mimedefang in
[cut]
You should upgrade! 2.16 is old, and fairly buggy. Perhaps you
On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 12:31:35PM -0600, Lucas Albers wrote:
Kelsey Cummings said:
The MaxMIMEParts looks only at total number of parts, not recursion
depth.
Clam shouldn't use huge amounts of memory for recursive parts (I can't
see a reason why a 50-part message would take
Can's you just add in as a high number mx, then move it up to be a lower
mx after you get it working?
Ray Spinhirne said:
I was afraid that was going to be the answer. Actually I have a surplus
of HPUX boxes now. What I don't have is much time to change things. And
the users are pretty
What blacklist zapped you??
This is a common tactic that mail-abuse.org uses... blacklist a whole
block of IP's to make the point that the ISP needs to clean house...
Unfortunately, I have a LOT of spam I'm blocking from ameritech.net too
via personal blacklists as well as spamhaus.org
This is the weird thing, I am not a dial up. I have a business service
with multiple IP's!! I don't know the black list but I will find out
in the morning. I'll bet that my IP's are not on your lists. I have
checked with MAPS and a few others, and I don't show up. What is a T1
25 matches
Mail list logo
