Directions:
change to quarantine dir.
backs each day to seperate tar.bz2.
pipe through bash to run.
works well enough for me.
awk command:
ls | awk -F- '{print tar cjpf $1-$2-$3-$4.tar.bz2
$1-$2-$3-$4*}'|sort -u |head -n 1
--
Luke Computer Science System Administrator
Security
Hi,
I'm rebuilding my primary MX, and I've been trialling MIMEDefang on my
secondary MX. So I duplicated the bulk of the config from my secondary MX to
my (yet to be commissioned) new primary MX.
I get the following:
mimedefang-multiplexor: Starting slave 0 (pid 3075) (1 running): About to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 06/28/2004 07:19:53
PM:
Try using it with quotes around the custom SMTP response string:
Bizarre! The books sendmail and sendmail Cookbook do not indicate the
need for the quotes. Neither does the documnetation at
http:/sendmail.org.
But I tried it anyways and
Why not just to a reject in the access list, that has the effect of
discard, but notifies the sender.
--
Luke Computer Science System Administrator
Security Administrator,College of Engineering
Montana State University-Bozeman,Montana
___
Visit
Jonas Eckerman said:
On Fri, 25 Jun 2004 12:49:34 -0700, Jeff Grossman wrote:
I know my next question is pretty open ended, but what do people
on this list prefer for their backend database, and why?
[Jonas said snip, db-file works for me.]
I'm unsure why you are suffering corruption in
--On Monday, June 28, 2004 10:59 AM -0400 Joseph Brennan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone have a clue what the bad code is, so we could reject mail
containing it?
I believe the issue is that IE ignores MIME type inconsistently when
deciding what to do with web content. The hostile website hosts
I've got a colo'd server in Cogent address space that can't send mail to
members at Road Runner addresses, presumably due to the Cogent black list.
In the past I've successfully bounced the mail off my office server using
mailertable entries but RR now recognizes the original source. I'm
on 6/29/04 9:49 AM, Lucas Albers at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jonas Eckerman said:
On Fri, 25 Jun 2004 12:49:34 -0700, Jeff Grossman wrote:
I know my next question is pretty open ended, but what do people
on this list prefer for their backend database, and why?
[Jonas said snip,
To effectively block, you'd need to block all links with graphic
extensions.
Cool!!!
Well, I don't think the user community here is ready... yet.
Joseph Brennan
Academic Technologies Group, Academic Information Systems (AcIS)
Columbia University in the City of New York
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 06/28/2004 08:14:52
PM:
I believe the issue is that IE ignores MIME type inconsistently when
deciding what to do with web content. The hostile website hosts a file
with
a graphic filename extension (eg. .jpg or .gif) but the file is actually
HTML with hostile
Jeff Grossman said:
[better] alternative to db_file with some of the corruption that has been
mentioned.
If many people are doing fine with db_file, then I might just stay with
Well it's used as the native bayesian db format for SA, and their has not
been complaints of corruption on the SA
Chris Gauch said:
The embedded perl interpreter definitely minimizes the memory usage by the
MD slaves, but I don't really notice an overall improvement in total
memory
usage when using the embedded perl option. All 1.5GB of RAM is still used
up entirely, and I have the same number of
duh,
didn't see any of the previous posts, until just now.
I guess I never do a reread, always a restart, that would explain why I
never saw the error.
Dave,
Should the default mimedefang-filter have use strict in it, in the
default install?
Would that solve some problems?
--
Luke Computer
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Lucas
Albers
Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2004 5:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Mimedefang] Greylisting code, now with mysql Backend
Jeff Grossman said:
[better] alternative to db_file with some of the
Hi,
Should the default mimedefang-filter have use strict in it, in the
default install?
Would that solve some problems?
It can fix some unpropper written code which makes troubles in the
reload szenario ...
Martin
___
Visit
On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 05:45:14PM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
Hi,
I'm rebuilding my primary MX, and I've been trialling MIMEDefang on my
secondary MX. So I duplicated the bulk of the config from my secondary MX to
my (yet to be commissioned) new primary MX.
I get the following:
From: Martin Blapp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Should the default mimedefang-filter have use strict in it, in the
default install?
Would that solve some problems?
It can fix some unpropper written code which makes troubles in the
reload szenario ...
*ALL* production Perl code should live
How do I set up auto-whitelisting in SA when running mimedefang? I uncommented
the lines in my mimedefang-filter but it seems like I should do something to my
sa-mimedefang.cf.
I have SA 2.63 and mimedefang 2.39
Thanks much,
Shawn
___
Visit
On Tue, 29 Jun 2004 12:44:28 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 06/28/2004 07:19:53
PM:
Try using it with quotes around the custom SMTP response string:
Bizarre! The books sendmail and sendmail Cookbook do not indicate the
need for the quotes.
OK here is the situation.
I have clamav-daemon which is run before trend micro's vscan.
The majority of viruses are found by clamav with no problems. One or two
slip past and are picked up by trend.
I altered my setup so the ones detected by trend get quarantined so I
could look further.
Stewart James wrote:
OK here is the situation.
I have clamav-daemon which is run before trend micro's vscan.
The majority of viruses are found by clamav with no problems. One or two
slip past and are picked up by trend.
Which version of clamav. We had this issue before we installed 0.73.
Still
OK.
It's .72, I remeber reading somewhere it was an issue in 0.70 but had
been fixed. (and osrry to all for not inluding version numbers.
Due to resource restraints (read: there is only one of me) I tend to
rely on debian packages.
A report of this issue being fixed 0.73 is enough for me to
Stewart James wrote:
OK.
It's .72, I remeber reading somewhere it was an issue in 0.70 but had
been fixed. (and osrry to all for not inluding version numbers.
Hmmm.. it was supposed to have been fixed in 0.72, we couldn't use 0.72
because of a Proxy issue, so I can't confirm if it actually did
Hmmm.. it was supposed to have been fixed in 0.72, we couldn't use 0.72
because of a Proxy issue, so I can't confirm if it actually did get
fixed there.
Well it's a 3 day wait (OK a couple more becuase that falls on a weekend
here). I will see if 0.73 resolves it for me, if not, I can start
24 matches
Mail list logo
