[Mimedefang] Any good mimedefang-filter examples of Greylisting that will work with Solaris/Sendmail?

2005-02-25 Thread Eric Yurick
I've seen several postings, but nothing that I can easily follow. I'd like to implement greylisting on a Solaris 9, sendmail 8.13.3, MIMEDefang with SpamAssassin platform. Any thing that has a simple database for holding the greylist (berkeley db?) would be useful. Thanks,

Re: [Mimedefang] Any good mimedefang-filter examples of Greylisting that will work with Solaris/Sendmail?

2005-02-25 Thread Keith Patton
Eric, I have had greylisting for some time now. ( over a year or so ).. Before mimedefang/ spamassassin had anything with greylisting, and hadn't changed... I'm using milter-greylist - http://hcpnet.free.fr/milter-greylist/ easy to setup and only requires telling sendmail you have 2 filters

Re: Spam: Re: [Mimedefang] Interesting way to send spam

2005-02-25 Thread James Ebright
Hehe, does not seem to pass my corpus of tests: On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 13:55:01 -0300 (EST), Marcelo Souza wrote Spam detection software, running on the system ni.esisnet.com, has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it

Re: [Mimedefang] OT: sendmail limit connections

2005-02-25 Thread -ray
On Fri, 25 Feb 2005, Matthew S. Cramer wrote: I implemented months ago and slowly increased the pause up to 1250 ms. I wanted to avoid any false positives (I have had none) and found that any further increase in the pause doesn't substantially increase the amount of rejections. We hit about

[Mimedefang] Re: Milter / Sendmail Question for Rate Throttle

2005-02-25 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
I am using MIMEDefang to do checks and then returning: return ('REJECT', No such user here); I am fairly certain that this return to sendmail does not get counted in the statistics for RCPT Flood Throttling (i.e. Possible SMTP RCPT flood, throttling.) Am I using the wrong return? Does

Re: [Mimedefang] OT: sendmail limit connections

2005-02-25 Thread Sven Willenberger
On Fri, 2005-02-25 at 16:43 -0600, -ray wrote: On Fri, 25 Feb 2005, Matthew S. Cramer wrote: I implemented months ago and slowly increased the pause up to 1250 ms. I wanted to avoid any false positives (I have had none) and found that any further increase in the pause doesn't

Re: [Mimedefang] Re: Milter / Sendmail Question for Rate Throttle

2005-02-25 Thread Sven Willenberger
On Fri, 2005-02-25 at 18:37 -0500, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: I am using MIMEDefang to do checks and then returning: return ('REJECT', No such user here); I am fairly certain that this return to sendmail does not get counted in the statistics for RCPT Flood Throttling (i.e. Possible SMTP RCPT

Re: [Mimedefang] Re: Milter / Sendmail Question for Rate Throttle

2005-02-25 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
It's easy enough to test; have your filter return failure for [EMAIL PROTECTED] and try it out to see if you get the log message. Thanks. I've seen the error of my ways. I assumed to some extent that it kept the state of bad users. But it doesn't? looks like you can make an error disconnect,