[Mimedefang] OT: sendmail dnsbl

2006-04-07 Thread -ray
All, Is there a way to change the port number that sendmail's dnsbl and endnsbl features use? I run a local rbldnsd server and rsync some blacklists. I want to know which list rejected an IP, so cant just have one FEATURE(`dnsbl') in sendmail.mc. Rather than having to bind a separate IP a

Re: [Mimedefang] OT: sendmail dnsbl

2006-04-07 Thread WBrown
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 04/07/2006 11:13:12 AM: > > All, > > Is there a way to change the port number that sendmail's dnsbl and endnsbl > features use? I run a local rbldnsd server and rsync some blacklists. I > want to know which list rejected an IP, so cant just have one > FEATURE(`d

Re: [Mimedefang] OT: sendmail dnsbl

2006-04-07 Thread -ray
On Fri, 7 Apr 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Are you going to log and/or add to each message's header or will you be checking it manually if there is a question? If the latter, use something like the spam database lookup at http://dnsstuff.com No it will be logged. I have a script that runs

Re: [Mimedefang] OT: sendmail dnsbl

2006-04-07 Thread WBrown
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 04/07/2006 11:34:19 AM: > No it will be logged. I have a script that runs through the maillog and > makes some rrdtool graphs, and i want stats on the number of hits for > each rbl. So i need sendmail to log a different entry for each rbl. You might research how c

Re: [Mimedefang] Wiki updates

2006-04-07 Thread Philip Prindeville
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>Anyone else have any comments about the example or the strategy? >> >> > >Very nice. > > If anyone ends up using it, and/or making improvements on it, please report your experience to me or the list. Thanks. ___ NOTE:

OT - Re: [Mimedefang] Phishing Question

2006-04-07 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
- Original Message - From: "Mark Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Kevin A. McGrail wrote: Great idea but unfeasible. In Virginia, this would be considered malicious programming and probably computer trespass as well :-( I used to live in Virginia and I don't miss that place. I cringe ev

Re: [Mimedefang] Phishing Question

2006-04-07 Thread Les Mikesell
On Thu, 2006-04-06 at 15:23, John Nemeth wrote: > The flip side to this is that the day when people are held > responsible for not securing their servers and allowing them to be used > to attack others is probably not very far off. I can see this be > similar to "attractive nuisance" laws.