In addition to the suggestions others have made, you can also install VNC
server on your linux machine (most distros have a package for it) and use a
VNC client from your Windows machine to connect to it. You can run multiple
displays within the VNC server (each one for different users if you
Cliff Hayes wrote:
For this idea, don't I have to have a GUI OS installed on the linux
box I'll be remoting into?
I did a test install on a spare Ubuntu box I had here, and yes, when I ask
apt to install vnc4server, it wants to pull down a ton of packages,
including several xserver* ones. So
John Rudd wrote:
Michael Sims wrote:
No biggie, my Net::DNS solution is working fine so I'll stick with
that for now.
What exactly is it that you're trying to do?
Get the PTR for the connecting relay, even if the forward and reverse lookups
don't match. Apparently $RelayHostname only
Jan-Pieter Cornet wrote:
On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 02:51:22PM -0600, Michael Sims wrote:
Mike Lambert wrote:
Michael Sims wrote:
Ah. So you're saying that sendmail doesn't provide the PTR record
to the milter unless it has verified that forward and reverse
match? That certainly seems
John Rudd wrote:
Michael Sims wrote:
John Rudd wrote:
What exactly is it that you're trying to do?
Get the PTR for the connecting relay, even if the forward and
reverse lookups don't match. Apparently $RelayHostname only
contains the PTR if they do match. Currently I'm checking
Joseph Brennan wrote:
--On Thursday, November 30, 2006 14:51 -0600 Michael Sims
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Received: from adsl86-34-215-137.romtelecom.net
(adsl86-34-215-137.romtelecom.net [86.34.215.137] (may be forged))
by my relay running MIMEDefang ...
However, inside my mimedefang
Mike Lambert wrote:
Michael Sims wrote:
Ah. So you're saying that sendmail doesn't provide the PTR record
to the milter unless it has verified that forward and reverse match?
That certainly seems to be what I'm seeing here.
This feature may help (it works for access.db lookups):
FEATURE
might fail)? Any help is appreciated...
(running MIMEDefang 2.56 if that is relevant...)
Michael Sims
___
NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other legal boilerplate in the above
message, it is NULL AND VOID. You may ignore it.
Visit http
Steffen Kaiser wrote:
However, what would be the way to intelligently
handle sendmail's .m4 conf script, without to disable lots of
functionality?
I'm not expert in this sort of thing, but I would have expected for the package
to
provide a sane default sendmail.mc and submit.mc, along with a
David F. Skoll wrote:
Kris Deugau wrote:
Maybe, maybe not. Debian package maintainers seem to delight in
Doing Things Differently for a lot of packages, but maybe that's
just my background learning all of the RedHat-isms first. g
Tell me about it! Two of the pieces of software we rely on
Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
Apologies in advance for off-topic post but it is for a good cause
and if anyone will know an answer, it's most likely to come from the
Anti-SPAM community.
[snip]
You may also want to post this to the SPAM-L list if you haven't already. I
know for a fact some AOL
alan premselaar wrote:
Ronald Vazquez NLM wrote:
'192.168.1.0' = '0.255.255.255',
also I think you also want to replace the = with , above. (my code
uses commas, i'm not sure if the = will work as well or not off the
top of my head)
That's not necessary.
Dave Williss wrote:
Or how about the losers who program some BIOSes?
Keyboard error. Press F1 to continue.
Or Please reply if you did not recieve this message.
My favorite was on an old Data General workstation...
Kernel Panic
Would you like to take a system dump?
LOL!
Aleksandar Milivojevic wrote:
David F. Skoll wrote:
Or how about the losers who program some BIOSes?
Keyboard error. Press F1 to continue.
Actually, this is not as silly as it might seem on first look. The
purpuse of this error message is to make sure user will connect the
keyboard
Jeff Grossman wrote:
What is a good book on Perl programming? I would like something that
will help me with the mimedefang-filter file.
IMHO the two most essential books are O'Reilly's Programming Perl (often
referred to as the Camel), and O'Reilly's Perl Cookbook. The first book
is a very
Matthew Schumacher wrote:
Anyway, why don't you put up a amazon wish list of something, while I
personally don't have a lot of money to give I want to at least buy
you a book, dvd, or something.
At one time Roaring Penguin's site had a PayPal donate link although I can't seem to
find it now.
John Nemeth wrote:
I save my mimedefang-filter file in a CVS repository. I
basically use the methods mentioned here:
http://www.mewburn.net/luke/papers/3rdparty-and-cvs.html . This
allows me to roll forward changes pretty much automatically.
Same here. In fact, I save every
Chris Myers wrote:
Greylisting only delays mail the first time you see a
sender/recipient pair, all subsequent messages from/to that same pair
are accepted immediately. You can always write your greylisting code
so that you don't reject for the first week or two and THEN turn on
tempfails
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
Is there a way to limit the number of SMTP connections based on
sending host IP?
You can do this with iptables and the iplimit module. See this post from the
archive:
http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/pipermail/mimedefang/2003-May/014352.html
HTH
my domain, or are bare IP addresses. Do you think that the
impact of having to accept DATA from these relays before being able to reject will
be noticeable? Or is there another approach that I'm missing?
___
Michael Sims
Project Analyst - Information
come from [EMAIL PROTECTED] and not someone else...
___
Michael Sims
Project Analyst - Information Technology
Crye-Leike Realtors
Office: (901)758-5648 Pager: (901)769-3722
Stephen Loeckle wrote:
to bypass outgoing mail, but I was wondering if there was a way to
still have it scan it for viruses (using mimedefang to call trend's
vscan) but still skip the spam detection.
See
http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/pipermail/mimedefang/2003-May/014570.html
You can search
___
Michael Sims
Project Analyst - Information Technology
Crye-Leike Realtors
Office: (901)758-5648 Pager: (901)769-3722
___
___
Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.canit.ca
Kelsey Cummings wrote:
I need to check for 'invalid' From and To headers in our inbound email
(primarily to catch spam that inserts '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' into
either header.) Does anyone have an example of how they did this or
pointers on where to wedge it in?
You basically need to open and
Kelsey Cummings wrote:
On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 04:10:46PM -0500, Michael Sims wrote:
Kelsey Cummings wrote:
I need to check for 'invalid' From and To headers in our inbound
email (primarily to catch spam that inserts
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]' into either header.) Does anyone have
an example
David F. Skoll wrote:
On Wed, 5 May 2004, Michael Sims wrote:
One caveat: I believe it is possible for the To header to contain
multiple lines.
When MIMEDefang writes the HEADERS file, it explicitly unwraps the
lines to ensure that exactly one complete header appears on each line.
Oops, my
different maillogs.
If you use the two instance method, all mail will pass through your external MX, so
you can gather all the relevant information there.
HTH...
___
Michael Sims
Project Analyst - Information Technology
Crye-Leike Realtors
Office: (901)758-5648
in people's
opinions. It's largely due to the .forward factor that I favor
action_discard() wherever possible over action_bounce()...
___
Michael Sims
Project Analyst - Information Technology
Crye-Leike Realtors
Office: (901)758-5648 Pager: (901)769-3722
(HEADERS, ' ./HEADERS');
while (HEADERS) {
if (/^X-Telstra-AS-Scanner: .*?, (.*?)% /i
$1 = 90) {
delete_recipient($_) foreach (@Recipients);
add_recipient('[EMAIL PROTECTED]');
last;
}
}
close(HEADERS);
___
Michael Sims
-filter if SA found this rule...
___
Michael Sims
Project Analyst - Information Technology
Crye-Leike Realtors
Office: (901)758-5648 Pager: (901)769-3722
___
___
Visit http
mimedefang-filter?
___
Michael Sims
Project Analyst - Information Technology
Crye-Leike Realtors
Office: (901)758-5648 Pager: (901)769-3722
___
___
Visit http://www.mimedefang.org
recipients inside the original block that runs the spam assassin check,
so that you only run the check once, and you avoid running it at all on
messages that are over 100k.
___
Michael Sims
Project Analyst - Information Technology
Crye-Leike Realtors
Office
(or provide a link to) a (small) sample
of one of the messages that is appearing this way?
___
Michael Sims
Project Analyst - Information Technology
Crye-Leike Realtors
Office: (901)758-5648 Pager: (901)769-3722
a
combination of cron, ssh, and scp. This is what I'm doing at the moment
because at the time I implemented it it was the least drastic change to my
existing setup...
___
Michael Sims
Project Analyst - Information Technology
Crye-Leike Realtors
Office: (901)758
() back into place later I would
suggest adding:
return('CONTINUE', 'OK') if ($sender eq '');
It might avoid a lot of headaches.
___
Michael Sims
Project Analyst - Information Technology
Crye-Leike Realtors
Office: (901)758-5648 Pager: (901)769-3722
the IP of the
relay, and if it isn't in your network AND the sender address isn't in your
whitelist array, then reject or discard the message...
HTH
___
Michael Sims
Project Analyst - Information Technology
Crye-Leike Realtors
Office: (901)758-5648 Pager: (901
Kris Deugau wrote:
Michael Sims wrote:
Your log files are showing the envelope sender, which is not always
the same as the address in the From header. Read receipts (or
disposition notifications or whatever you want to call them) are sent
using a null () envelope sender for the same reason
...
___
Michael Sims
Project Analyst - Information Technology
Crye-Leike Realtors
Office: (901)758-5648 Pager: (901)769-3722
___
___
Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.canit.ca
MIMEDefang mailing list
[EMAIL
...
___
Michael Sims
Project Analyst - Information Technology
Crye-Leike Realtors
Office: (901)758-5648 Pager: (901)769-3722
___
___
Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.canit.ca
MIMEDefang mailing list
David F. Skoll wrote:
On Fri, 27 Feb 2004, Michael Sims wrote:
Basically I say all this to ask a question. Is it possible that this
message is taking so long to transfer that the MD slave is dying
before it is fully received, and this is what is causing the broken
pipe error?
Nope
Peter A. Cole wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Michael Sims [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(3) Sometimes I'll temporarily use
action_add_header() to add debug information directly into the
headers of a message I'm using as a test.
I'll have a go at doing this tonight. I assume by simply
this.
HTH...
___
Michael Sims
Project Analyst - Information Technology
Crye-Leike Realtors
Office: (901)758-5648 Pager: (901)769-3722
___
___
Visit http://www.mimedefang.org
[quoting rearranged]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 24 Feb 2004 at 18:47, Michael Sims wrote:
Have you customized your filter? The example that comes with the
distribution only calls SpamAssassin if the message is 100KB or
less. I would suggest that you verify that this hasn't been
changed
PROTECTED],
delay=00:03:10, pri=4723633, stat=Please try again later
___
Michael Sims
Project Analyst - Information Technology
Crye-Leike Realtors
Office: (901)758-5648 Pager: (901)769-3722
)?
___
Michael Sims
Project Analyst - Information Technology
Crye-Leike Realtors
Office: (901)758-5648 Pager: (901)769-3722
___
___
Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.canit.ca
I adjust the score. My suspicion is that it'll
be at least 99.9% spam.
Thanks for sharing...
___
Michael Sims
Project Analyst - Information Technology
Crye-Leike Realtors
Office: (901)758-5648 Pager: (901)769-3722
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Michael Sims [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Personally I think that's a great idea. I've seen these a lot
lately too and I think I'm going to put something like this into
place as well. But how about making the pattern simply:
/font-size:\s*1;/i
rant
Kelson Vibber wrote:
At 12:10 PM 2/10/2004, Michael Sims wrote:
/font-size:\s*1\s*(?:px)?\s*;/i
I'm not enough of a CSS expert to know what would happen if I threw
em and ex in there, but I'm afraid that might create some false
positives...
1em would be pointless for obfuscation purposes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 10 Feb 2004, Michael Sims wrote:
Here's the pattern I finally settled on:
/font-size:\s*1\s*(?:p[xt])?\s*;/i
Cool, I think I will go with that one too. Just out of curiosity,
how are you scoring that, and what is your reject threshold (if
any)?
Right
49 matches
Mail list logo
