d a rejection to the
> connecting server, and drop the connection, effectively slamming
> the door on
> the spammer.
>
This brings up the mail reason I'm not using MailScanner. Mail rejected
during the SMTP conversation goes back to the sending server. Mail bounced
afterwards g
> Actually, somebody had a quite similar question recently ;-(
>
> have a look at this thread:
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=11646654946&r=1&w=2
>
> hope that helps!
Certainly does. I searched the archives, but missed this thread. Thanks
much!
-- tim --
_FROM_RFC_POST (0.22),FORGED_RCVD_HELO
(1.23),UNDISC_RECIPS (0.01)
Is there an easy way to do this? Or could someone point me to where it's
spelled out in excruciating detail in the docs and I missed it completely?
Thanks much,
--
Tim Boyer
Director IT and Engineering Projects
Denman Tire C
I've been using MIMEDefang / SpamAssassin for years. I'm running 3.1.6 on a
Red Hat box, and 99% of the time, all is well.
Last week I added a rule to tag those annoying .gif pump-and-dump emails.
Nothing fancy:
rawbody IMG_SRC_CID /src\=(\"c|c)id\:/i
score IMG_SRC_CID 2.0
Most of
I've been using SA for years. I'm running 3.1.6 on a Red Hat box, and 99% of
the time, all is well.
Last week I added a rule to tag those annoying .gif pump-and-dump emails.
Nothing fancy:
rawbody IMG_SRC_CID /src\=(\"c|c)id\:/i
score IMG_SRC_CID 2.0
Most of the time it works fine
On Thu, 05 Jan 2006 08:32:35 -0500, "David F. Skoll" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Tim Boyer wrote:
>
>> That was it. Thanks much - and I'll submit a bug report. The default filter
>> won't work, either.
>
>Sure it will. action_drop_with_warnin
On Wed, 04 Jan 2006 21:17:04 -0500, "David F. Skoll" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Tim Boyer wrote:
>
>> return action_drop_with_warning("\n.\n\n");
>
>[...]
>
>> I've changed action_drop_with_warning to action_bounce.
&g
On Wed, 04 Jan 2006 21:17:04 -0500, "David F. Skoll" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Tim Boyer wrote:
>
>> return action_drop_with_warning("\n.\n\n");
>
>[...]
>
>> I've changed action_drop_with_warning to action_bounce.
&g
ZHG013872: set_reply returned
MI_FAILURE
It's doing everything absolutely correctly until that last failure.
I've got no idea what I'm doing wrong here - any help is appreciated. Thanks
much...
--
tim boyer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
NOTE: If th
e 0
stderr: Undefined subroutine &main::canonicalize_email called at
/etc/mail/mimedefang-filter line 245, line 6.
Have I typed it wrong? Spelled it wrong?
--
Tim Boyer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.canit
On Mon, 07 Feb 2005 09:48:13 -0500, "Dave O'Neill"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Tim Boyer wrote:
>> I'm getting the following in the log file when receiving mail:
>>
>> Feb 6 21:10:32 tolstoy mimedefang-multiplexor[28288]: Slave 0
>> stderr:
I understand, an
optimal solution.
Thanks much for any assistance...
--
Tim Boyer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.canit.ca
MIMEDefang mailing list
MIMEDefang@lists.roaringpenguin.com
http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
; mailer.
>
>Well, just trying to solve the mystery of the original content type header
>and I've exhausted my ideas if gmane isn't the culprit.
>
>Regards,
>KAM
Thanks for the ideas. I'll keep at it.
--
Tim Boyer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
x27;ve copied both of you with a copy of this message running through my
'real' mailer.
Sorry about the confusion...
--
Tim Boyer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.canit.ca
MIMEDefang mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
t's straight Sendmail Switch. No nntp around.
--
Tim Boyer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.canit.ca
MIMEDefang mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
On Mon, 8 Nov 2004 17:02:19 -0800, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Tim Boyer wrote:
>> On Fri, 5 Nov 2004 18:07:03 -0500, "Dan Tulovsky"
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Does your sa-mimedefang config file contain this line:
>>
x27;ll try
setting it to 0, just in case it's getting inherited from somewhere
else. Thanks!
--
Tim Boyer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.canit.ca
MIMEDefang mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
rocmail recipe such as html-trap.procmail :
>
>http://www.impsec.org/email-tools/html-trap.procmail
>http://www.math.rutgers.edu/procmail/pm/html-trap.rc
>
>Check for /etc/procmailrc, $HOME/.procmailrc
>
>Number Six
Not using procmail, so that's not it - but thanks.
--
Tim Bo
On Fri, 5 Nov 2004 08:13:15 -0500 (EST), "David F. Skoll"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Fri, 5 Nov 2004, Rob MacGregor wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 04 Nov 2004 18:45:17 -0500, Tim Boyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > I'm using RH Enterprise, Sendmail Swi
On Fri, 5 Nov 2004 07:11:23 +, Rob MacGregor
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Thu, 04 Nov 2004 18:45:17 -0500, Tim Boyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'm using RH Enterprise, Sendmail Switch, MimeDefang 2.44 and
>> SpamAssassin 3.0.1. Somewhere in there a very
which program is mangling
the headers. Does anyone know off the top of their head what could be
doing this?
Thanks much...
--
Tim Boyer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.canit.ca
MIMEDefang maili
gt;Instead of
> if ($hits >= $req) {
>
>do this (untested:)
> if ($hits >= $req and $RelayAddr ne "127.0.0.1") {
>
>This will allow the remailed items to skip over the action_bounce.
I was getting a loop, so that sounds _very_ likely. I'll g
On Fri, 01 Oct 2004 09:07:07 -0700, Kelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Tim Boyer wrote:
>> It's bouncing:
>>
>> Sep 30 21:14:43 melbourne2 sm-mta[17694]: i911EUd5017694: Milter:
>> data, reject=554 5.7.1 SpamAssassin has identified this email
On Fri, 1 Oct 2004 10:34:25 +1000, "Matt Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>"Nathan Martinez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> would give URIDNSBL a try, but I can't seem to get its rules to run. I
>> have $SALocalTestsOnly = 0 in my mimedefang-filter.
>
>Hi Nathan,
>
>Having just enabled this fea
On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 07:19:25 -0400 (EDT), "David F. Skoll"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Thu, 30 Sep 2004, Tim Boyer wrote:
>
>> Hmmm, either that didn't work, or (much more likely) I'm doing it
>> wrong:
>>
>>
On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 16:35:29 -0700, Kelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Tim Boyer wrote:
>> Is there any way for the same message to be bounced, AND send a copy to
>> postmaster? Until I get comfortable with SpamAssassin, I'd like Postmaster
>> to take a
TED]');
return ();
and
action_bounce("SpamAssassin has identified this email as
possible spam");
return ();
but is it possible to do both?
Thanks much,
--
Tim Boyer
Director
Information Systems and Engineering Projects
> On Fri, 24 Sep 2004, Tim Boyer wrote:
>
> > > > Why the heck would I get one score when called from MIMEDefang,
> > > and another > when done 'by hand'?
>
> Because MIMEDefang doesn't do network tests unless you ask it to.
> This is in the
> Hi,
>
> > Why the heck would I get one score when called from MIMEDefang,
> and another
> > when done 'by hand'?
>
> Sounds like you have two or more spamassassin config files. The one from
> spamassassin is residing in /usr/local/etc/mail/local.cf, the other is the
> mimedefang one in /docsis/e
I'm not quite sure where to begin debugging this one.
I'm running MIMEDefang 2.44 with SpamAssassin 3, and everything is working
great - except SpamAssassin's 'look up URLs against DNS blocklists' feature.
The odd part is that it seems to be working when I run SpamAssassin in debug
mode, but not
30 matches
Mail list logo
