On 10/22/2019 07:19, Dianne Skoll wrote:
> On 10/21/19 5:51 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
>> Good Evening everyone,
>> My name is Kevin A. McGrail. I've been a long-time user of MIMEDefang
>> and I'd like to put myself forward to take the mantle of leadership from
>> DFS now that she has moved on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Philip Prindeville wrote:
I used to get some useful Logwatch info when I was
running FC3:
...snip...
Then I upgraded the OS to FC5 (but kept everything else
the same), and now I hardly get anything useful at all:
...snip...
So... Anyone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Yizhar Hurwitz wrote:
HI.
Here is my cached implementation of md_check_against_smtp_server.
I publish it here for other to look at, and for tips on improving it.
[...snip...]
sub filter_recipient
{
my($recip, $sender, $ip, $host, $first,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Delahunty, Mark wrote:
When I run spamassassin manually it seems to behave differently from when
MIMEdefang runs it.
...snip...
I've attached my local.cf, init.pre and the full output from spamassassin
--lint -debug
What am I missing/doing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tim Boyer wrote:
action_change_header(X-Spam-Score, $hits ($score) $names);
works great, and gives me the total score. It would be great, however, if I
could get more detail, e.g.,
X-Spam-Score: 8.152 () AWL,BAYES_99
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
megaspaz wrote:
...snip...
I'm only really interested in mimedefang for the antivirus integration, so
setting up mimedefang to process only emails with suspicious attachments
and letting spamassassin process everything else would be fine, but it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matt Kettler wrote:
Gilles Hamel wrote:
Hello,
We are running v3.1.5 with mimedefang.
Here is our setup :
our own MTA with spamassassin ---/-- MTA at our ISP, our MX is HERE
w.x.y.z / INTERNET
In the local.cf file we have :
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Cormack, Ken wrote:
I'd like to see if anyone has any comments on an idea to block spam from
forged senders who claim my domain in the sender address. I'm assuming
something like this could (or should?) be done for both the SMTP MAIL
FROM: and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Cormack, Ken wrote:
I'd like to see if anyone has any comments on an idea to block spam from
forged senders who claim my domain in the sender address. I'm assuming
something like this could (or should?) be done for both the SMTP MAIL
FROM: and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Steve,
Steve Campbell wrote:
...snip...
Why don't you just use sendmail to trow them away? As others already
pointed that out, you could provision your primary access database(s) to
the secondary (or make the secondary use the primary's
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Atanas wrote:
...snip...
I primarily deal with non-standard sendmail setups hosting virtual
domains (e.g. multiple mailboxes and multiple domains per single user)
via local delivery agent (LDA) like procmail and maildrop, where
sendmail acts as
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Steve,
Steve Campbell wrote:
[snip]
a) MIMEDefang does things like relay checks, sender checks, and
recipient checks that MailScanner doesn't do.
This is where I want to remove the backup MX senders.
This type of scenario has been debated
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tory Blue wrote:
Did a search and a few people see this but no answers.
Did I miss something running Mime 2.44/clamav/sendmail 8.13 on a Linux box
mimedefang-multiplexor[15477]: Slave 1 stderr: Warning: unable to close
filehandle LOGF
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alan Premselaar wrote:
Just to kind of raise this issue again... I've googled and haven't found
any definitive information (yet) ...
I just upgraded to SA 3.1.3 and just now started seeing this problem
(i.e. i wasn't having this problem up
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Les Mikesell wrote:
..snip..
The place this is likely to be a problem is where you have
virtual web servers with names in lots of domains pointing
to the same box and you do want to accept mail for some
of those names. Note that CNAMES take
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kris Deugau wrote:
netguy wrote:
Receintly I updated DNS for a few domains. My registrar gives the
option of assigning an IP addy for domain.tld without having an alias:
mail.domain.tld Ok, says I, lets give it a go. Bam! Slam, Spam
started
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Luke Worthy wrote:
Sorry about my previous post, I now realize that we need to keep some
other features of this filter (it keeps a copy of everyones email as
well as the exemption thinggy).
So below is my original post, and the listing of the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:
Anyone have any idea why this piece of my mimedefang filter suddenly
quit working?
if ($FoundVirus) {
md_graphdefang_log('virus', $VirusName, $RelayAddr);
md_syslog('warning', Discarding because
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Richard J. Kieran wrote:
On Friday, 4/7, I updated clamav from version .88 to .88.1. When I did so,
virus scanning broke. Maillog was filled with entries like:
Apr 7 15:49:23 hoover mimedefang.pl[66764]: Problem running virus scanner:
code=999,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mickey Hill wrote:
On Thu, 2006-03-02 at 11:12 -0500, webmaster wrote:
Well, sa-mimedefang.cf doesn't exist. Where can I obtain it and what
does it say?
I believe it's in /etc/mail now.
I concur. Although I softlink
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Daniel O'Connor wrote:
[snip]
Hmm but mail that is destined to pass through mailman is handled by
MIMEDefang
first - I want to tell MD to treat all mail to my lists as for the mailman
user (ie use the mailman user's Bayes DB).
I don't
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
ya, if you gather all the disclaimers and then send them to the
originating companies all at once, can you cause a disclaimer paradox
and thus the universe to explode?
Dave Williss wrote:
I hope you sent a copy of the combined disclaimers to them.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
I have upgraded to SA 3.1 but i get strange actions...
I think that the SA is now checked before mimedefang filters and skips
other
filters...(but i'm not 100% sure about that? how can check?)
Did you install
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Joseph Brennan wrote:
...snip...
No, since I have not been asked to do such a thing. The question
just got me started thinking about how difficult it is to define
what outgoing mail is. I didn't even mention the situation we
have here, and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mathew,
Sorry for not answering your exact question...BUT
What should should sertainly do is upgrade mimedefang to latest 2.54 and SA
3.0.3 and clamAV 0.87
Actually, SA 3.0.3 is still susceptable to a remote
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mathew Thomas wrote:
Hi
I use some Perl script to analyse the syslog which produces a lot of
information like total mail, no. inbound/outbound mail, no. of spam, no.
of mail with viruses, dropped mail, etc daily via a cron job. I would
like to
Garry Glendown wrote:
Oh how easy life would be if customers just bought services and stopped
complaining about missing features ... ;)
OK, here we go ... after some advice from the list, I installed MD to
add special filtering capabilities to a customer mailserver. So far so
good ...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm confused...
I got a mailbox call spamdrop, where all spam detected by Mimedefang-SA is
quarantined.
Some of the emails subject is altered to contain:'*SPAM*', some
'[SPAM]', and some are not changed???!!!???
I still have the problem of honest spam endup in
Jeff Grossman wrote:
[snip]
Sorry for the run on message before. I have MIMEDefang set up with the
md_check_against_smtp_server setting. So, it checks my server first to see
if the address is valid or not. So, do you think it is still a problem with
just putting the addresses I want to
Rolf wrote:
hello
I've tried so many combinations and none work. Feeling a bit silly.
Where can I put in mimedefang-filter a statement so that the filter
exits before any processing happens based on $RelayAddr ??
I've tried a simple: return if ($RelayAddr eq ip address); in various
parts
Ian Mitchell wrote:
...snip...
HELO junkmail.com
MAIL FROM: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RCTP TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DATA
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
...
Why would this make it past your SPAM filter? Unless you're doing
something like whitelisting
Rudy Attias wrote:
Hey all,
I'm quite new with this configuration but I seem to get the hang of it.
I'm running a mail relay(no local account) that forward to an exchange
2003 server in the lan. The relay is running sendmail and mimedafang
that scan using spamassassin and clamav. I have 2 main
Michal Jankowski wrote:
There are two users - user A and user B. User A wants to receive
everything, user B wants to have all spam mail rejected (with
action_bounce, so in case of a false positive the sender is notified).
There comes a mail addressed to both A and B. What should mimedefang
do?
Craig Green wrote:
...snip...
Note that since you're in filter_end, the HEADERS file *is* available,
so you can just parse that if you'd prefer. There was nothing wrong
with your initial logic; it's just that parsing the file on disk is
slower *and* it takes more code than using the MIME
Bill Curtis wrote:
So any idea why these aren't getting any scores at all?
Bill,
If it were I, I'd put some debuging md_syslog calls in. right after
you receive the results from the sa check and then also write before you
write those values to the header.
chances are somewhere in
Chris Gauch wrote:
Alan wrote:
One of the reasons I use 550 rejects for viruses is that I also scan
outgoing mail... so if by some chance one of my users gets infected with
a virus (regardless of the fact that we have desktop antivirus software
installed on all our machines as well as ClamAV
Dirk the Daring wrote:
...snip...
##
sub filter_sender {
my($sender, $hostip, $hostname, $helo) = @_;
# Can't be psicorps.org unless it's one of our IP's.
if ($helo =~ /(^|\.)psicorps\.org$/i) {
if ($hostip ne 127.0.0.1 and $hostip ne 209.170.141.XXX and
Dirk the Daring wrote:
Is there a particular order in which I should start sendmail, MD and
Clam? That is, are there any dependencies, or reason that one should be
running before the other (seems that sendmail will gripe about a missing
socket if MD is not running, so I start MD first, but
Greg Schlut wrote:
Still bringing back that error. Spamassassin was not scanning the files
and I did increase the delay. Any other ideas? I may try upgrading
mimedefang this weekend, and see if that solves it, but it really does
look like a timeout issue.
Thanks for the help.
--Greg
Greg,
David F. Skoll wrote:
...snip...
Interesting idea. I wonder how easy it would be to maintain local
signatures for Clam, just to catch this kind of thing? I'll have
to investigate.
I've never personally done it, but from following the conversations on
the clamav users list, it seems like it's
Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
I am trying to assist with a problem where emails coming through an
anti-spam gateway are getting scored with ALL_TRUSTED. I don't see a reason
why they should be. I've looked at the SA Source code but still at a loss
and I'm worried it's something in the mimedefang
Richard J. Kieran wrote:
Thanks for the thoughts.
The required_hits setting is in sa-mimedefang.cf only. SpamAssassin figures it out and MIMEDefang doesn't. hmmm...
I restarted MIMEDefang every time I made a change to the setting. No change.
The same .cf files work on the old server.
Definitely
Christopher Roberts wrote:
Ben wrote:
You literally telnet on P:25 to their SMTP server and type
the commands by hand.
If you still get the error - something is wrong on their end.
You live and learn! I have tried doing this for
mailgate01.barclays.co.uk and mailgate02.barclays.co.uk and 90% of
-ray wrote:
[snip]
No, but I have seen 2.5 points before. :) Silly question, where would i
put a new rule like that? I'm already changing some scores in
/etc/mail/mimedefang/sa-mimedefang.cf, but not sure where to add a new
rule.
ray
Ray,
you should be able to create a file in
Jan Pieter Cornet wrote:
[snip]
sub canonicalize_email ($) {
my ($email) = @_;
$email =~ s/^//;
$email =~ s/$//;
return lc($email);
}
basically all it does is remove any or from the email and return it
in lowercase.
Actually, looking at this code again (with a clear
Mack wrote:
When i stream by recipient, the email get's discarded and resent to each
recipient as expected, however the new email doesn't pass through mimedefang
(specifically filter begin/part/end). This results in not being virus chk/spam
chk/boilerplated.
It just seems to get sent directly
Tim Boyer wrote:
I tried putting in one of the subroutines that David presented at the
Lisa '03 session. It's got the line
$recipient = canonicalize_email($recipient);
in filter_recipient.
But when I run it, I get this in the logs:
...snip...
Have I typed it wrong? Spelled it wrong?
Tim,
Keith Patton wrote:
Yes sendmail accepts it, then it passes it to netscape and it rejects
it.. Funny thing is that sometimes it works other is doesn't.I have
noticed that nearly all the bounces I have seen has the content in
foreign character set ( chineese or Korean )... That is why I asked
Josh Kelley wrote:
alan premselaar wrote:
I'd be interested in at least looking at it. Currently I'm using
procmail for local delivery and its Quota handling is kludgey at best.
I'd really like to get something working within MD. Since the method
Jan uses calls the perl module for Quota
Jan Pieter Cornet wrote:
We're not using it for any compliance testing (mainly because
we're an ISP), but we do use it for other things:
- rejecting on quota exceeded earlier than sendmail detects it
How are you checking quota? Sounds interesting.
Using the perl interface to quotactl, the Quota
Jan Pieter Cornet wrote:
[snip]
You probably have direct attached storage on the linux box? Apparently
that makes a difference. As a workaround, you could either run the
mimedefang slaves as root (not recommended) or run a specialised quota
daemon, as root, that can perform the quota queries for
Josh Kelley wrote:
[snip]
We use a setuid copy of /usr/bin/quota to do quota checking on our Red
Hat server. (We use a copy rather than making /usr/bin/quota setuid
since any updates to the quota package would reset the setuid bit.)
It's probably not the most efficient setup, but I thought
Jan Pieter Cornet wrote:
...snip...
Anyway, I consider it a feature :) It makes users more likely to clean
up their act, instead of inadvertently using your system as a rain barrel.
are you using stream_by_recipient to do this? or are you rejecting the
mail for every recipient if just one of the
Speedy Sweedy wrote:
Ok, based on what you guys are saying in here, I am now only scanning
with mimedefang and using it to call clamav. I've tested my install
with the resource from testvirus.org and it catches everything jut fine.
How do I get mimedefang to test for spam now? I have
John Von Essen wrote:
[snip]
I am looking into SPF plugin for SA now. Does anyone know how it handles
domains with no SPF record? I would assume that if no SPF exists, then
forgeries are not penalized for that domain. Just need to make sure
before I turn this plugin ON in production.
basically
Today I had an interesting situation.
This is more of an FYI in case anyone else has run into similar
problems. (cross-posted to MIMEDefang list as well)
I use SpamAssassin with MIMEDefang.
I got notified by one of my users that they were unable to send mail
suddenly. after checking the logs I
James Ebright wrote:
As far as directories go.. the x bit simply means you can get a directory
listing if you have privledges. For files it turns on execute allowing the
file to be run as a program. I do not believe that should affect the operation
of MimeDefang in any way as MD does not need the
alan premselaar wrote:
[...snip...]
I just encountered this same problem on a system that has been running
flawlessly until today.
I was seeing a bunch of
Mar 24 09:44:04 mail mimedefang-multiplexor[21236]: Killing busy slave
17 (pid 10445): Busy timeout
Mar 24 09:44:04 mail mimedefang[21249
David F. Skoll wrote:
alan premselaar wrote:
So, to reply to my own post, I've been toying around and determined
that Embedded Perl appears to be the culprit.
That kind of makes sense. If the multiplexor is very slow to
initialize, mimedefang waits a bit before entering the main loop.
The code
David F. Skoll wrote:
alan premselaar wrote:
So, to reply to my own post, I've been toying around and determined
that Embedded Perl appears to be the culprit.
...snip...
something's *really* hosed. I copied the mimedefang-filter.example
file, and just changed the email addresses of the admin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David F. Skoll wrote:
Most of the spam messages that I receive are addresses to
non-existing users... Mailing list I guess... Can I setup a way to
accept mail for only a list of e-mail addresses?
Yes, there are a number of ways to do this. Search the list archives
for
David F. Skoll wrote:
Hi,
Does anyone use File::Scan with MIMEDefang? It seems to cause a lot
of problems with false positives.
For the next release, I'm considering removing the auto-detection
of File::Scan. In other words, if you want File::Scan, you'll have to
specifically ask for it in your
Kenneth Porter wrote:
I've got the following function for bouncing spam/viri in my office
server. This gets invoked whenever the filter would bounce or discard,
such as when the spam score is over 10.
If the mail was addressed to a legitimate local mailbox (other than info
or hostmaster) I
Ronald Vazquez NLM wrote:
Hello list:
I have the following code as part of my:
...snip...
my %trustedSubnets = (
^^
# Looopback
'127.0.0.1' = '255.255.255.255',
# Home Network
Marco Supino wrote:
Hi,
I am running mimedefang (2.48) on solaris, through the milter, and have
problem with scanning japanese emails, it seems mimedefang strips the
japanese mime parts,
I dont know where to start in order for this not to happen, and i am
still new to mimedefang, any help is
Ronald Vazquez NLM wrote:
Hello:
I have been tasked with configuring MIMEDefang to allow a virus to come in
thru the first instance, tag it with X-RrestrictedAttachment to allow our
virus scanner to process it. The idea is that once Trend Micro drops the
attachment, we
Paul Murphy wrote:
Alan,
Check that you are running "spamassassin -D -p
/etc/mail/spamassassin/sa-mimedefang.cf" or whatever to make sure that MD and
your manual check are using the same config. If this is the issue, then
carefully compare the default SA config with the
Aleksandar Milivojevic wrote:
...snip...
Starting with MD 2.46 (or 2.47?) location of sa-mimedefang.cf was moved
from /etc/mail/spamassassin to /etc/mail. Try moving the file, or
making symbolic link, and see if that is going to make any difference.
sweeet. that was it. not sure why i missed
I'm having an interesting problem.
I have:
MD 2.48
SA 3.0x (happens with 3.00 and 3.01)
perl 5.8.5 5.6.1 (happens on two seperate systems)
RedHat ES 3.0 RedHat 7.2
when mail passes through MIMEDefang and calls SpamAssassin, even though
I've got ok_locales and ok_languages set to en ja (to also
Lisa,
Lisa Casey wrote:
Hi Folks,
...snip...
I'ld also like to drop, bounce, whatever mail that has certain words in the
subject, such as rolex, penis, viagra, etc.
I know I can do the above with MIMEDefang/Spamassassin, but I'll be darned
if I can figure out how. And the more I try to figure it
Jeff Rife wrote:
On 30 Oct 2004 at 0:16, David F. Skoll wrote:
...and the RFC pretty clearly says that an IP address should *never* be
used as the argument to HELO, so that rule *should* reject all e-mail.
Umm... reread his code.
...snip...
Jeff,
I think what David was trying to point out is
Trevor Dodds wrote:
Hi,
Can someone please tell me the command that will display all the modules
mimedefang
is using.
Thanks
Trevor
Trevor,
I believe what you're looking for is mimedefang.pl -features
alan
___
Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and
Kris Deugau wrote:
alan premselaar wrote:
I just recently installed a system with MD 2.45 and SA 3. and
while doing some testing to see if the network tests were running, I
determined that the -C option to spamassassin does not work as
expected.
the man pages are a little hazey about
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Graham Dunn wrote:
What options are required when running spamassassin from the command
line to get the same behaviour as you would see when run in
mimedefang?
Other than using -C
/usr/local/etc/mimedefang/spamassassin/sa-mimedefang.cf
Also should run as the defang user
Bill Maidment wrote:
I've had mimedefang-2.45 spamassassin-3.0.0 clamav-0.80rc2 running for
about a week OK on a dual opteron. Then yesterday a friendly bz2 file
came in as an attachment and clamav threw a fit. I upgraded to
clamav-0.80rc3 and still had the same problem, so I went back to
Johann wrote:
[snip]
http://fedora.redhat.com/download/
It is the only thing that will get rid of all the malware you have now,
including Windows 2000. :-)
a good pair of wire cutters will prevent spyware too.
___
Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and
Ben Kamen wrote:
...snip...
But seriously, it's so easy to set up StartTLS on the client side...
you know, you would think that... but, as an example, Microsoft
Entourage (part of Office 2000) for OS X doesn't support STARTTLS, only
SSMTP. sure you can use SMTP AUTH, but you'd have to configure
Sven Schuster wrote:
...snip...
This rule usually does work, even when I reinject this mail (as present
in the users mbox) into sendmail (port 25). I also don't have any
rules to skip spam scanning for certain senders or recipients or the
like.
Any idea what's going wrong here??
are you using the
Kenneth Chan wrote:
Hi,
I have a raq4 with sendmail 8.10. Which is the most recent version that will work
with sendmail 8.10? Is there an archive of previous versions available for download?
Thanks
Ken.
Kenneth,
If I'm not mistaken (and this is off the top of my head after a long
day at
Les Mikesell wrote:
On Thu, 2004-07-22 at 10:24, Vivek Kumar wrote:
Yes its gorave not gorav (typo error). I was trying to send it to lists
related to mail as I was not getting porper answer for that.
Sorry for any inconvenience.
[snip]
Note that by doing this
you lose the ability to check valid
Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:
Not that I really want to do this, but I have a mail server right now
on which I want to remove MIMEDefang all together, and just leave
sendmail running. The folks on that machine actually WANT all their
spam and viruses, so...who the hell am I to tell them no.
Rich West wrote:
Thanks to all of those that responded.
Based upon all of the ideas, I came up with the following code to do the
trick.
-Rich
sub filter_begin () {
...
%lists = get_lists();
...snip...
open (LISTS, /var/mailman/bin/list_lists -b|)
or die Could not execute
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Jim McCullars [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 9 Jul 2004, Vivek Kumar wrote:
Hi Matthew,
I tried both the following syntax you suggested but I got
compliation
error.
How about just:
if ($hostip =~ /^191\.0\.(?:0|1)/) {
Jeffrey Goldberg wrote:
[snip...]
To mimedefang-filter I've added the following two functions
sub filter_sender {
my ($sender, $ip, $hostname, $helo) = @_;
return('ACCEPT_AND_NO_MORE_FILTERING', Sender whitelisted)
if is_whitelisted($sender, $ip);
return ('CONTINUE', ok);
}
sub
Chris Masters wrote:
Hi All,
Since upgrading to the latest MIMEDefang today I have
bad file descriptor errors - I assume this is an
embedded perl scope issue.
So, I currently do the following:
1) I do *not* use filer_initialise
2) The file descriptor are global and are declared
*outside* of any
Lucas Albers wrote:
Would this item; in filter_end exclude all further mail filtering, on mail
going from localhost to this a particular recipient?
#in filter_end.
if ($recipient =~ /[EMAIL PROTECTED]/) {
exit;
}
Does not appear to be working...
Lucas,
if you just want to bypass all
On 2/17/04 9:31 PM, "Paul Murphy" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...snip...
debug: bayes: 29638 tie-ing to DB file R/O /var/spool/spamassassin/bayes_toks
debug: bayes: 29638 tie-ing to DB file R/O /var/spool/spamassassin/bayes_seen
debug: bayes: found bayes db version 2
debug:
On 1/29/04 1:44 AM, "Ole Craig" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 01/28/04 at 08:32, 'twas brillig and Scott Harris scrobe:
Subject: RE: [Mimedefang] Problem running clamd but not clamscan
Scott, et al -
I had similar issues with clamd versus clamscan (see
Hi,
I recently installed clamav 0.65 on my machine (in conjunction with
File::Scan) and I've noticed that ocassionally clamav is returning that it's
found a virus, but $VirusName is empty.
any ideas as to why this might be happening? or where to look for this?
i'm
I'm sure this has been covered before, but i couldn't find it in the
archives (could just be i'm tired) ...
anyways, lately i've been seeing A LOT of 4.7.1 failures in my log file.
I've got my MIMEDefang spool dir on a tmpfs, and i haven't made any changes
to my filter recently.
90 matches
Mail list logo
