Re: [Mimedefang] Phishing Question

2006-04-07 Thread Les Mikesell
On Thu, 2006-04-06 at 15:23, John Nemeth wrote: > The flip side to this is that the day when people are held > responsible for not securing their servers and allowing them to be used > to attack others is probably not very far off. I can see this be > similar to "attractive nuisance" laws.

OT - Re: [Mimedefang] Phishing Question

2006-04-07 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
- Original Message - From: "Mark Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Kevin A. McGrail wrote: Great idea but unfeasible. In Virginia, this would be considered malicious programming and probably computer trespass as well :-( I used to live in Virginia and I don't miss that place. I cringe ev

Re: [Mimedefang] Phishing Question

2006-04-06 Thread Mark Johnson
Kevin A. McGrail wrote: Great idea but unfeasible. In Virginia, this would be considered malicious programming and probably computer trespass as well :-( I used to live in Virginia and I don't miss that place. I cringe even when I have to drive through it :) Only place I know that you c

Re: [Mimedefang] Phishing Question

2006-04-06 Thread John Nemeth
On Aug 27, 5:47am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: } [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 04/06/2006 10:45:39 } AM: } } > Not that I would necessarily condone this type of activity, but with the } > amount of spam/spyware/adware/phishing attempts I see in a day, wouldn't } > be a really interesting project to do

Re: [Mimedefang] Phishing Question

2006-04-06 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
Great idea but unfeasible. In Virginia, this would be considered malicious programming and probably computer trespass as well :-( > > create a network of computers like SETI, where nice home users run a > > program on their computer that will take idle cycles and put false > > usernames and passw

RE: [Mimedefang] Phishing Question

2006-04-06 Thread Matthew.van.Eerde
Mark Johnson wrote: > create a network of computers like SETI, where nice home users run a > program on their computer that will take idle cycles and put false > usernames and passwords to these sites. If enough people > participated, the data collected by the phishers would be so bad, > noone wou

Re: [Mimedefang] Phishing Question

2006-04-06 Thread Mark Johnson
You'd probably be taking out (somewhat) innocent third parties. Most of the phishing web sites are on legit servers that have been compromised. I guess you could argue that they deserve it for not securing their servers, but I doubt the owner would feel that way when their business just dies

Re: [Mimedefang] Phishing Question

2006-04-06 Thread WBrown
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 04/06/2006 10:45:39 AM: > Not that I would necessarily condone this type of activity, but with the > amount of spam/spyware/adware/phishing attempts I see in a day, wouldn't > be a really interesting project to do something like this? Set up a > database somewhere

[Mimedefang] Phishing Question

2006-04-06 Thread Mark Johnson
This is WY off-topic, but I was wondering what others opinions were of this. I sat in on a security lecture given by a very reputable speaker. Every aspect of security was touched upon, but the rising issue of phishing really caught my attention. I could never figure out why people would