Problems updating via rsync

2001-09-29 Thread Gorm Jorgensen
I'm having problems updating ::apache-site via rsync from dev.apache.org I have received the same error the last threee days, no matter what time I try to update. @ERROR: max connections (25) reached - try again later Anyone else having problems ? -- Gorm Jorgensen - Area51.DK d+ s: a-- C+++

Re: Problems updating via rsync

2001-09-30 Thread Paul Schuh
I'm having the same problem. Last two days. -- Paul On Sat, 29 Sep 2001, Gorm Jorgensen wrote: > > I'm having problems updating ::apache-site via rsync from dev.apache.org > I have received the same error the last threee days, no matter what time I > try to update. > > @ERROR: max connections (2

Re: Problems updating via rsync

2001-09-30 Thread Dmitry Morozovsky
On Sat, 29 Sep 2001, Paul Schuh wrote: Moreover, I've stopped rsync after noticing that it's mirroring the whole structure (about 2G) two times yesterday. PS> I'm having the same problem. Last two days. PS> PS> -- Paul PS> PS> On Sat, 29 Sep 2001, Gorm Jorgensen wrote: PS> PS> > PS> > I'm having

Re: Problems updating via rsync

2001-09-30 Thread Gorm Jorgensen
Quoting Dmitry Morozovsky ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > Moreover, I've stopped rsync after noticing that it's mirroring the whole > structure (about 2G) two times yesterday. > Ohh no, Apache guys is there attention on this problem ? -- Gorm Jorgensen - Area51.DK d+ s: a-- C+++ UB P+ L++ E--- W+

Re: Problems updating via rsync

2001-09-30 Thread Henk P. Penning
On Sun, 30 Sep 2001, Gorm Jorgensen wrote: > Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2001 21:37:48 +0200 > From: Gorm Jorgensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Problems updating via rsync > Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Quoting Dmitry Morozovsky ([EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: Problems updating via rsync

2001-09-30 Thread jason andrade
On Sun, 30 Sep 2001, Henk P. Penning wrote: > > Ohh no, Apache guys is there attention on this problem ? > > -- The 'dist' archive is a big mess now: current stuff, old stuff, > devel stuff; it's all there. It appears, disappears, > appears again. > > -- there is not a byte of guid

Re: Problems updating via rsync

2001-09-30 Thread Henk P. Penning
On Mon, 1 Oct 2001, jason andrade wrote: > Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2001 07:16:32 +1000 (EST) > From: jason andrade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Problems updating via rsync > Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > On Sun, 30 Sep 2001, Henk P. Penning wro

Re: Problems updating via rsync

2001-09-30 Thread jason andrade
On Mon, 1 Oct 2001, Henk P. Penning wrote: > I've tried to keep my mouth shut for a long time; I agreed > with the effort that were made to improve the situation; > even tried to calm down those who were pushing too hard; > but now I've had it. shrug. i lost it a while ago, but there's on

RE: Problems updating via rsync

2001-10-01 Thread Andrew Kenna
ssage- From: jason andrade [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01, 10, 2001 7:17 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Problems updating via rsync On Sun, 30 Sep 2001, Henk P. Penning wrote: > > Ohh no, Apache guys is there attention on this problem ? > > -- The 'dist' archive

RE: Problems updating via rsync

2001-10-01 Thread Andrew Kenna
EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01, 10, 2001 8:39 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Problems updating via rsync On Mon, 1 Oct 2001, Henk P. Penning wrote: > I've tried to keep my mouth shut for a long time; I agreed > with the effort that were made to improve the situation; > even tried

RE: Problems updating via rsync

2001-10-01 Thread Henk P. Penning
On Tue, 2 Oct 2001, Andrew Kenna wrote: > Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2001 08:34:35 +1000 > From: Andrew Kenna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: Problems updating via rsync > Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >

RE: Problems updating via rsync

2001-10-01 Thread jason andrade
On Tue, 2 Oct 2001, Andrew Kenna wrote: > The tier-1 mirror idea sounds like a good one jason as it would relieve the > load on the main site at apache and we would i'm sure be able to simplify > things. > > I do think that the ftp site needs to be just a pure distribution point only > with no ht

RE: Problems updating via rsync

2001-10-02 Thread Andrew Kenna
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 02, 10, 2001 9:59 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: Problems updating via rsync On Tue, 2 Oct 2001, Andrew Kenna wrote: > The tier-1 mirror idea sounds like a good one jason as it would relieve the > load on the main site at apache and we would i&

RE: Problems updating via rsync

2001-10-02 Thread Ask Bjoern Hansen
On Tue, 2 Oct 2001, Andrew Kenna wrote: > I'll do a bit of digging around and see how this find a local mirror script > works because when I logon to iprimus at home I get the Australian apache > mirror site, but when I used to logon to fastlink I would get mexico "this" as in what? ftp-dist.apa

RE: Problems updating via rsync

2001-10-02 Thread Andrew Kenna
At the moment the entire apache-site archive is 3.8gb is size Regards Andrew -Original Message- From: Dmitry Morozovsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01, 10, 2001 3:01 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Gorm Jorgensen Subject: Re: Problems updating via rsync On Sat, 29 Sep 2001, Paul

RE: Problems updating via rsync

2001-10-02 Thread Henk P. Penning
On Tue, 2 Oct 2001, Andrew Kenna wrote: > Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2001 10:53:46 +1000 > From: Andrew Kenna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: Problems updating via rsync > Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >

Total incompetence (was Problems updating via rsync)

2001-10-01 Thread Tornoci Laszlo
On Mon, 1 Oct 2001, jason andrade wrote: > On Sun, 30 Sep 2001, Henk P. Penning wrote: > > > > Isn't there someone with an ounce of brains to organise this ? > > > a few of us have been asking this for more than a year now - perhaps > not quite like that. andrew kenna has come on board recently

Re: Total incompetence (was Problems updating via rsync)

2001-10-01 Thread Bert Vermeulen
On Mon, 1 Oct 2001, Tornoci Laszlo wrote: > Lots of people don't comment, because the problem is a long standing one, > and we haven't seen any real reaction from the apache people to the > complaints raised here. It is beyond my understanding, how a very good and > successful open source project

Re: Total incompetence (was Problems updating via rsync)

2001-10-01 Thread The Flying Hamster
On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 05:49:07PM +0200, Bert Vermeulen wrote: [...] > > Most importantly: HAVE SOMEONE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MIRROR, who is on list > > list. > > That's the most important point, allright. For an example of how it should > be done, just look at the Proftpd project. The person respo