On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 11:56:37PM -0700, Austin Hook wrote:
> I wanted to fetch a remote ssh port into my home computer which is behind
> the cable modem and the NAT that the cable system is doing on the address
> it's DHCP gave out to me. That way I could, from any third location, say
> from my
I wanted to fetch a remote ssh port into my home computer which is behind
the cable modem and the NAT that the cable system is doing on the address
it's DHCP gave out to me. That way I could, from any third location, say
from my laptop on the road, ssh into my home computer through the tunnel
that
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I tried to upgrade an old server with 3.8 via a floppy. It was
> running 3.7 with a DB and web server previously.
>
> During the upgrade, it did not detect the NIC. As it was a test
> server, I tried a re-install rather than an upgrade...same thing.
>
> The 3.7 instal
I tried to upgrade an old server with 3.8 via a floppy. It was running 3.7
with a DB and web server previously.
During the upgrade, it did not detect the NIC. As it was a test server, I
tried a re-install rather than an upgrade...same thing.
The 3.7 install disk works so I know it is not a pr
Julesg wrote:
I want to put up 3.8 on my laptop.
Can I download and run a DOS or Windoz pgm?
you can download lots of DOS and Windows programs. Few will help you
with this task, however. :)
I don't think I'm up to a PXE install., (It's the TCP scripting that frightens
me.)
What TCP sc
On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 02:42:42AM +0100, Moritz Lutz wrote:
> Hi there,
> i got an problem here. I got an old laptop 100mhz 10,4". So there is
> no internal network
> interface so i want to run an wireless lan card in it (cardbus). But
> i don't get it work. I was
> already reading the OpenBSD
I'm hardly an expert so I hope you get some other opinions but here
are my thoughts:
On 2/10/06, Constantine A. Murenin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At a remote location, I have two boxes that are connected with each
> other via a serial cable, and through a router to the internet.
>
> One of the
On 2006/02/11 02:43, Constantine A. Murenin wrote:
> One of the boxes is OpenBSD 3.6, and I'd like to upgrade it to 3.8,
> and then compile -current (I want to play with the kernel alongside
> sensors.h / lm(4)).
3.8 -> current/3.9-beta requires tedious and unnecessary steps.
don't bother, instal
I want to put up 3.8 on my laptop.
Can I download and run a DOS or Windoz pgm?
I don't think I'm up to a PXE install., (It's the TCP scripting that frightens
me.)
--jg
Hello,
At a remote location, I have two boxes that are connected with each
other via a serial cable, and through a router to the internet.
One of the boxes is OpenBSD 3.6, and I'd like to upgrade it to 3.8,
and then compile -current (I want to play with the kernel alongside
sensors.h / lm(4)).
W
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi there,
i got an problem here. I got an old laptop 100mhz 10,4". So there is
no internal network
interface so i want to run an wireless lan card in it (cardbus). But
i don't get it work. I was
already reading the OpenBSD FAQ but no effect if i p
Craig,
I'm going to second this, even though I don't work at an ISP (however, I do
work with large amounts of syslog data).
If you want to keep things organized, it's better to keep the syslog files
organized by service.
When you've got data coming from a large amount of servers, you want to:
1
On 2006-02-10 10:46:02 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am setting up an openbsd box to be the catcher for a couple
> of AIX boxes to pitch their log files to. Using the standard
> syslogd, I am wondering if I can set it up so that each of the
> AIX boxes gets its own log file on the openbsd bo
scp from linux to linux via an ipsec tunnel between openBSD gateway and lancom
1611+ router fails( hangs) if tcp window scaling is enabled.
This is my setup:
Redhat Linux ES3 <---> dc0 openBSD IPSEC dc1 < internet -> lancom
1611+ <---> Redhat Linux ES4
RHES3 does
scp a.a host:
On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 10:46:02AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am setting up an openbsd box to be the catcher for a couple of AIX boxes to
> pitch their log files to. Using the standard syslogd, I am wondering if I
> can set it up so that each of the AIX boxes gets its own log file on th
On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 12:54:28PM -0600, eric wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-02-10 at 10:46:02 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] proclaimed...
>
> > I am setting up an openbsd box to be the catcher for a couple of AIX boxes
> > to pitch their log files to. Using the standard syslogd, I am wondering
> > if I can s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Bizarrely enough it was an onboard Marvell/Broadcom from Asus, which
just happened to have the same MAC as a connector's SK-9521 (also
uses the Marvell/Broadcom chip) running in an HP server box.
Not sure if the SK had ever been flashed, but there i
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Feb 2006, eric wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 2006-02-10 at 10:46:02 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> proclaimed...
> >
> > > I am setting up an openbsd box to be the catcher for a couple of AIX
> boxes
> > > to pitch their log files to. Using the standard syslogd, I a
On 2006/02/10 10:46, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Or, would it just be easier to throw everything into one file and
> user perl to split out the two logs?
FreeBSD has this, it works in a similar way to the per-program
selectors, I don't know how much work it would be to port across.
grep is another
The Thinkpads do have a good reputation for xBSD, and I picked up a good
condition T30 which runs both NetBSD and OpenBSD without major drama, from a
UK corporate left-over outfit called ITClear - www.itclear.co.uk. They were
very helpful when the battery didn't charge as it should - sent a seco
On Fri, 10 Feb 2006, eric wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-02-10 at 10:46:02 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] proclaimed...
>
> > I am setting up an openbsd box to be the catcher for a couple of AIX boxes
> > to pitch their log files to. Using the standard syslogd, I am wondering
> > if I can set it up so that eac
On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 01:18:58PM -0500, Will H. Backman wrote:
> How functional and safe is pkg_add -u at this point?
it is safe.
Functionality depends a lot on the reliability of your package feed,
e.g., if you use a ftp server that is likely to not let you in part of
the time, pkg_add -u will
You could setup different facilities on the separate AIX boxes (local1,
local2, local3, etc..)
Then on your openbsd box add the following line to your syslogd.conf
#AIX box 1
local1.*/var/log/aix1.log
#AIX box 2
local2.*/var/log/aix2.log
Don't forget to update th
On Fri, 2006-02-10 at 10:46:02 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] proclaimed...
> I am setting up an openbsd box to be the catcher for a couple of AIX boxes
> to pitch their log files to. Using the standard syslogd, I am wondering
> if I can set it up so that each of the AIX boxes gets its own log file on
I am setting up an openbsd box to be the catcher for a couple of AIX boxes to
pitch their log files to. Using the standard syslogd, I am wondering if I can
set it up so that each of the AIX boxes gets its own log file on the openbsd
box. Something like /var/log/aix1.log and /var/log/aix2.log.
On Fri, 10 Feb 2006, Tilo Stritzky wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> while doing some reading on secure software development
> (//www.ranum.com/security/computer_security/archives/security-for-developers.pdf)
> I came across the advice "always link your priviliged binaries
> statically".
>
> However a quic
How functional and safe is pkg_add -u at this point?
Also, I just wanted to say thanks for the hard work on the pkg_* tools.
They just keep getting better.
--
Will Backman - Network Administrator
Coastal Enterprises, Inc.
http://www.ceimaine.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hah! That took awhile, but the duplicate IP question got me
thinking down that path and I found the one-in-a-billion duplicate...
A duplicate _MAC_ address.
Whoa, that was a zebra. But at least you all got me thinking down
some alternative paths
С 1 ÑевÑÐ°Ð»Ñ 2004 г. изменÑÑÑÑ&089 #1103; ÑаÑиÑÑ Ð½Ð°
доÑÑÑп к ÑеÑи ÐнÑеÑнеÑ
по коммÑÑиÑÑ&091 #1077;мÑм ÑелеÑоннÑ&099 #1084;
линиÑм и на ÑÑлÑги
ÑазмеÑени&080 #1103; доменнÑÑ
имен,
Dear Chase clie
Hi list,
while doing some reading on secure software development
(//www.ranum.com/security/computer_security/archives/security-for-developers.pdf)
I came across the advice "always link your priviliged binaries
statically".
However a quick check on my system revealed me almost all suid/sgid
progr
On 10/02/06, Siju George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> BSD on x86 has also suffered at the hands of these maniac virus
> coders, so much so that there are hardly any BSD x86 web servers on
> the web that haven't been repeatedly p0wned.
>
> http://www.webpronews.com/expertarticles/expertartic
Edd Barrett wrote:
On 2/10/06, Budhi Setiawan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dear All,
Can you give me a link HOWTO/FAQ/tutorial to create a NIS
server/client on OpenBSD.
Found this on google, but dont know how accurate it is.
http://www.openbsdsupport.org/sharedhomes.html
I could have swor
On 2/10/06, Martin Schrvder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2006-02-10 17:10:41 +0530, Siju George wrote:
> > BSD on x86 has also suffered at the hands of these maniac virus
> > coders, so much so that there are hardly any BSD x86 web servers on
> > the web that haven't been repeatedly p0wned.
> >
Ok bad form for replying to self. Sorry, I have to do it again.
Coffee has helped me realize that the kernel's revarp is actually working,
however I had to crank the retry counter in sys/netinet/if_ether.c
from 20 to 200
to get it to wait long enough for a reply.
The pxeboot stuff versus the ins
On 2006-02-10 17:10:41 +0530, Siju George wrote:
> BSD on x86 has also suffered at the hands of these maniac virus
> coders, so much so that there are hardly any BSD x86 web servers on
> the web that haven't been repeatedly p0wned.
>
> http://www.webpronews.com/expertarticles/expertarticles/wpn-62
On Fri, 10 Feb 2006 17:10:41 +0530
Siju George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> BSD on x86 has also suffered at the hands of these maniac virus
> coders, so much so that there are hardly any BSD x86 web servers on
> the web that haven't been repeatedly p0wned.
>
> http://www.webpronews.com/e
Siju George wrote:
Hi,
BSD on x86 has also suffered at the hands of these maniac virus
coders, so much so that there are hardly any BSD x86 web servers on
the web that haven't been repeatedly p0wned.
http://www.webpronews.com/expertarticles/expertarticles/wpn-62-20060209SecurityThroughObscurity
Hi,
BSD on x86 has also suffered at the hands of these maniac virus
coders, so much so that there are hardly any BSD x86 web servers on
the web that haven't been repeatedly p0wned.
http://www.webpronews.com/expertarticles/expertarticles/wpn-62-20060209SecurityThroughObscurityThreatenedasMacsBecom
The message "Returned mail: see transcript for details" from , sent on
2/10/2006 08:07 was quarantined because it contained either an executable file,
a batch file or a screen saver file. All of these types of attachments are
considered security risks. Please consult your mail administrator who
On 2/10/06, Budhi Setiawan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Dear All,
>
> Can you give me a link HOWTO/FAQ/tutorial to create a NIS
> server/client on OpenBSD.
Found this on google, but dont know how accurate it is.
http://www.openbsdsupport.org/sharedhomes.html
I could have swore it was in the
40 matches
Mail list logo
