> I'm trying to install a snapshot on a Dell PowerEdge 6300 using the
> floppyB boot disk.
> Unfortunately, the Adaptec AIC-7860/AIC-7890 SCSI Host adapters aren't
> being configured so I cannot setup the disks. According to
> http://openbsd.org/i386.html the AIC-7860 and AIC-7890 are supported
> b
>I'm just wondering if the Niagara chip (by Sun) is supported on OpenBSD
Full and proper support of the Ultrasparc III processor is pretty much an
implied requirement first... and we're still working on that...
On Sunday 22 October 2006 22:41, you wrote:
> this isn't correct. Every service had some security problems in the
> past. Imagin that your service X is vulnerable (only since a few h
> by a zero day exploit or so) and someone tries to exploit it at 2:00 in
> the morning.
Good thing there cant be an
Hi,
I'm just wondering if the Niagara chip (by Sun) is supported on OpenBSD
(On-die encryption would make for very sweet vpn firewalls me thinks).
I think I read somewhere something about Sun kind of open sourcing the
design of the chip, did I dream this?
Thanks,
JD
P.S. WHEN WILL THOSE
On Sun, 22 Oct 2006, Girish Venkatachalam wrote:
> You mean to say that newer versions of OpenSSL do not allow you to
> create DSA keys longer than 1024 bits, but then isn't there an export
> and a non export version?
No, longer DSA keys do not offer extra cryptographic strength unless
you make o
Tom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
> I'm trying to install a snapshot on a Dell PowerEdge 6300 using the
> floppyB boot disk.
it's on floppy A
Matthias Kilian wrote on Sun, Oct 22, 2006 at 09:14:01PM +0200:
> On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 04:13:44PM -0500, Robby Workman wrote:
>> Linux: NVIDIA Binary Graphics Driver Exploit
>> http://kerneltrap.org/node/7228
>> http://www.rapid7.com/advisories/R7-0025.jsp
>
> Yes, and really scares me are the
On 22/10/06, ropers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 22/10/06, Matthias Kilian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't know the english words, so here's my impression of this
> situation in german (perhaps someone may translate it):
>
> Die Leute lassen sich wie die Laemmer zur Schlachtbank
>
Hi,
I loaded 4.0 into a nice new Sun x2100 M2 and looks like it's working
pretty well so far anyway.
But I see a few weird things in the dmesg, like the dual core cpu
display one core at 1.8GHz and the other at 2.4 sometime?
Some device show not configure, but looks like they work.
Compare
On Sunday 22 October 2006 21:13, Kevin Reay wrote:
> On 10/22/06, Per-Olov Sjvholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi again
> >
> > I am looking at the CVS. I can't see its possible to out of the box
> > remove addresses from a round robin scheme in PF against a faulty web
> > server. Am I missing
On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 04:13:44PM -0500, Robby Workman wrote:
> Linux: NVIDIA Binary Graphics Driver Exploit
>
> http://kerneltrap.org/node/7228
> http://www.rapid7.com/advisories/R7-0025.jsp
Yes, and really scares me are the guys that still don't get it.
After some days of vacation I just chec
Hi
I'm trying to install a snapshot on a Dell PowerEdge 6300 using the
floppyB boot disk.
Unfortunately, the Adaptec AIC-7860/AIC-7890 SCSI Host adapters aren't
being configured so I cannot setup the disks. According to
http://openbsd.org/i386.html the AIC-7860 and AIC-7890 are supported
by ahc(4)
On Sunday 22 October 2006 17:29, Bill Marquette wrote:
> On 10/22/06, Per-Olov Sjvholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > I have followed this thread. Can anyone point out a working download
> > link? Sourceforge does not have any working mirrors for this
> > slbd-1.3.tar.gz file.. Probably
On 22/10/06, Matthias Kilian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't know the english words, so here's my impression of this
situation in german (perhaps someone may translate it):
Die Leute lassen sich wie die Laemmer zur Schlachtbank
fuehren -- immer und immer wieder.
People let
> It is like a port knocking service but a little bit different:
>
> Normaly a port knocking service uses TCP/UDP, but openportd
> uses ICMP echo response packets because they are not so easy
> to send like echo requests or TCP/UDP port tests (kiddies could
> simply use ping or nmap for this job).
On 10/22/06, Per-Olov Sjvholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi again
I am looking at the CVS. I can't see its possible to out of the box remove
addresses from a round robin scheme in PF against a faulty web server. Am I
missing something?
But I maybe misunderstood Kevin Reay that in this thread s
On Sun, Oct 22, 2006 at 02:18:09PM +0400, Bruno Carnazzi wrote:
> Hi misc,
>
> When upgrading some packages with 'pkg_add -u', I sometimes see :
> No need to update
> and
> Candidates for updating ->
>
> What's the difference ?
> Please notice that in first case, the package seems "ignored",
Steffen Wendzel wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 14:42:18 +0200 "Inigo T. A." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
> : If you have a security problem with a service, the only "more secure"
> : action is to fix it, don't to open it eventually.
> :
>
> this isn't correct. Every service had some security prob
On 22/10/06, Steffen Wendzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 14:42:18 +0200 "Inigo T. A." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
: El dom, 22-10-2006 a las 12:40 +0200, Steffen Wendzel escribis:
: > On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 20:57:39 -0400 "Nick Guenther" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
:
: > :
: > : So
On 10/22/06, Per-Olov Sjvholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi
I have followed this thread. Can anyone point out a working download link?
Sourceforge does not have any working mirrors for this slbd-1.3.tar.gz file..
Probably a misconfiguration somewhere.
Hmm, didn't notice that they didn't mirror
Hi,
On Oct 22, 2006, at 4:41 PM, Steffen Wendzel wrote:
this isn't correct. Every service had some security problems in the
past. Imagin that your service X is vulnerable (only since a few h
by a zero day exploit or so) and someone tries to exploit it at
2:00 in
the morning.
but if you run
On Sun, Oct 22, 2006 at 04:41:17PM +0200, Steffen Wendzel wrote:
>
> this isn't correct. Every service had some security problems in the
> past. Imagin that your service X is vulnerable (only since a few h
> by a zero day exploit or so) and someone tries to exploit it at 2:00 in
> the morning.
>
On Sunday 22 October 2006 15:48, Girish Venkatachalam wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 21, 2006 at 10:04:19PM +0200, Per-Olov Sj??holm wrote:
> > Here is a post with info that solves and explain the case if someone else
> > get stuck in the problem.
> >
> > This problem was actually caused by an updated OpenS
On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 14:42:18 +0200 "Inigo T. A." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: El dom, 22-10-2006 a las 12:40 +0200, Steffen Wendzel escribis:
: > On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 20:57:39 -0400 "Nick Guenther" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
:
: > :
: > : So this is like an insecure version of SSH?
: >
: > it h
El dom, 22-10-2006 a las 12:40 +0200, Steffen Wendzel escribis:
> On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 20:57:39 -0400 "Nick Guenther" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> :
> : So this is like an insecure version of SSH?
>
> it has nothing todo with SSH. And of course it isn't very secure
> BUT it adds security where no
On Sat, Oct 21, 2006 at 10:04:19PM +0200, Per-Olov Sj??holm wrote:
> Here is a post with info that solves and explain the case if someone else get
> stuck in the problem.
>
> This problem was actually caused by an updated OpenSSL. I have had 2048 and
> 4096 SSH keys that have worked perfect unt
On Sunday 22 October 2006 01:44, Kevin Reay wrote:
> > Point of correction, slbd didn't have the ability to ping IP addresses.
>
> Good call.
>
> > You might check the code in CVS, it should compile and work on 3.9.
>
> Your right, I didn't notice it was being maintained. Thanks for the
> pointer,
On Sun, Oct 22, 2006 at 03:55:39AM -0700, Kian Mohageri wrote:
> On 10/22/06, Steffen Wendzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > You normaly have different open ports
>
>
>
> pf(4) makes this a minor issue. No offense, but what you have there (in the
> example specifically) is no better tha
On 10/22/06, Steffen Wendzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> You normaly have different open ports
pf(4) makes this a minor issue. No offense, but what you have there (in the
example specifically) is no better than a "limited" (if you consider ability
to reboot or kill ssh "limited") version o
On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 20:57:39 -0400 "Nick Guenther" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: On 10/21/06, Steffen Wendzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: > hi,
: >
: > I wrote a new tool I call OpenPortd for my linux distribution
: > but since I my linux distribution is still under development
: > and I want to r
On Sat, 21 Oct 2006, Nick Guenther wrote:
On 10/21/06, Steffen Wendzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
40tg340503n5 pf/iptables (load some other rules or whatever)
So this is like an insecure version of SSH?
If you configure it to behave like that, probably.
But if you configure it to open a po
Hi misc,
When upgrading some packages with 'pkg_add -u', I sometimes see :
No need to update
and
Candidates for updating ->
What's the difference ?
Please notice that in first case, the package seems "ignored", and in
the second case, the package seems uninstalled and reinstalled in the
sam
32 matches
Mail list logo
