It is not just an implication, that's exactly what it said:
receives OpenBSD security advisories and pointers to security patches
as they become available.
If I tell you that I'll give you fries as they become available what
would you think I am saying?
It is really simple English and as there
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 18:03:02 +1100
Sunnz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I tell you that I'll give you fries as they become available what
would you think I am saying?
Unless it's your job to give them to me now and I have paid you to do
so I'd expect to get them whenever you have them and feel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 15/03/2007 19:26:48:
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trying to dump a filesystem with nodump flags on some folders results
in
these folders been dumped anyway, even on higher level dump and even
if I
specify -h flag to dump.
Your correct, the nodump
2007/3/16, Travers Buda [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
* tony sarendal [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-03-16 06:03:49]:
of ingratitude... because there is ingratitude. To add insult to
injury, people ask for more than what is freely offered. Example:
this thread.
Are people really asking for more than what is
But if you see fries do become available wouldn't you ask me what happened?
Yes I may have no obligation to give you fries, but since I said I
will give you the fries when they become available, should I not
expect you to ask me what's went wrong with my offering?
2007/3/16, Lars Hansson [EMAIL
On 16/03/07, Travers Buda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* tony sarendal [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-03-16 06:03:49]:
http://www.openbsd.org/mail.html
---
*security-announce* Security announcements. This low volume list
receives
OpenBSD security advisories and pointers to security patches as
Karl O. Pinc [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 03/15/2007 11:04:49 PM, Jeremy Huiskamp wrote:
That's what I was going to say. If you did things properly,
you would have had this patch applied before you knew that it
was a remote hole.
You have a valid point: any bug is a security problem.
http://www.coresecurity.com/index.php5?module=ContentModaction=itemid=1703
says:
Vulnerable Packages
OpenBSD 4.1 prior to Feb. 26th, 2006.
OpenBSD 4.0 Current
OpenBSD 4.0 Stable
[...]
OpenBSD-current, 4.1, 4.0 and 3.9 have the fix incorporated in their source
code tree and kernel binaries for
On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 11:52:44AM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 10:26:23AM +, Gaby Vanhegan wrote:
Hi,
Reading the security advisory for the ipv6 buffer issue, the
workaround is to block inet6 traffic in pf.conf. My default block
line is actually:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 04:46:26PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
This means everyone should have our latest patches installed.
[...]
*Solution/Vendor Information/Workaround*
The OpenBSD team has released a security fix to correct the mbuf
problem, it is available as a source code patch for
On 3/16/07, Lars Hansson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 18:03:02 +1100
Sunnz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I tell you that I'll give you fries as they become available what
would you think I am saying?
Unless it's your job to give them to me now and I have paid you to do
so
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 09:42:47AM +0100, Karel Kulhavy wrote:
http://www.coresecurity.com/index.php5?module=ContentModaction=itemid=1703
says:
Vulnerable Packages
OpenBSD 4.1 prior to Feb. 26th, 2006.
OpenBSD 4.0 Current
OpenBSD 4.0 Stable
[...]
OpenBSD-current, 4.1, 4.0 and 3.9 have
Heise.de
http://www.heise.de/security/news/meldung/86730
CL
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 02:31:09AM +, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
I agree. I'm very annoyed that I have to read about this
problem on slashdot. The misc list is not the right place
for this announcement, some low-traffic announce list that
goes right into my inbox is where this stuff belongs.
I
On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 05:45:39PM +0100, Tom Van Looy wrote:
What about: Release Mode: FORCED RELEASE?
This is about the exploit, right? And not the advisory.
Why isn't anything written on the title page openbsd.org? Having a remote root
exec proof of concept is not enough to ask the users to
2007/3/16, Kian Mohageri [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Yeah. Expectations aside, being condescending is never warranted. Both
Karl and Martin did just that. They could have asked if there was a reason
it wasn't sent to security-announce@ instead of misc@, rather than saying
This is terrible handling of
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 09:54:16AM +0100, Karel Kulhavy wrote:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 04:46:26PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
This means everyone should have our latest patches installed.
*Solution/Vendor Information/Workaround*
The OpenBSD team has released a security fix to correct
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 09:48:19AM +0100, Karel Kulhavy wrote:
I have put block in inet6 into my /etc/pf.conf. Do I need to do anything
else (turn something on somewhere else) or does it already protect against
the overflow? How can I test that the protection really works? Is there
somewhere a
Who's drawing those OpenBSD cartoons like
http://www.openbsd.org/images/openbsd41_cover.gif
They are cool. Can Theo draw so well or does he employ an artist?
CL
2007/3/16, Theo de Raadt [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I don't know what to say. I am trying to get past the first
impression of you being a whining liar who quotes some fiction author.
Theo,
is flaming all you have to say in this thread?
Seriously: Do you think this bug was handled in the right way?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This also means that every time I want to dump a fs I have to reset the
nodump flags for all the files in those directories I don't want to
include as newer files won't keep that.
Since dump does not traverse filesystyems, an alternative solution is
to store the
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 10:08:02 +0100
Karel Kulhavy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.heise.de/security/news/meldung/86730
And for the majority of the worlds population that doesn't speak German
this says exactly what?
--
Lars Hansson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
I'm not a developer and I don't have any programming skills ... sadly
... ;-(
From time to time I build my own releases on a i386.
When I do a make release I would like 2 additional kernels to be build
automatically.
A (standard) Make release builds the following kernels:
1) bsd
2)
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 09:54:16AM +0100, Karel Kulhavy wrote:
Is it possible to fix OpenBSD 4.0 system without compiling anything, by e. g.
somehow rewriting the file that contains the kernel? I have never compiled
OpenBSD, ports etc. and don't have time to study all the theory around
2007/3/16, Lars Hansson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
OpenBSD project isn't exactly overflowing with personell. But maybe
Karl and Martin are volunteering to maintain security-announce.
I'd be willing to do that (forward erratas to security-announce), but
let's not forget that OpenBSD is a dictatorship,
Ryan Corder wrote:
alternatively, I did this and it seemed to work
pass out on bge0 from inside to { any, !outside }
pass out on bge0 from inside to { any, !llcidr }
The above is an overkill equivalent to
pass out on bge0 from inside to any
which I doubt is what you want.
/Alexander
Is it possible to fix OpenBSD 4.0 system without compiling anything,
by e. g. somehow rewriting the file that contains the kernel?
Yes, if you have a copy of the kernel from someone you trust to
provide it.
I have never compiled OpenBSD, ports etc.
No need to compile all of OpenBSD.
1. If
etc.i386/Makefile.inc, line 24: Need an operator
You need an empty line before each target... (here, bsd.acpi)
etc.i386/Makefile.inc, line 26: Need an operator
etc.i386/Makefile.inc, line 29: Need an operator
etc.i386/Makefile.inc, line 31: Need an operator
And commands used to build them
Report states that OpenBSD developers played down critical vulnerability
http://www.heise-security.co.uk/news/86757
Lars Hansson wrote:
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 10:08:02 +0100
Karel Kulhavy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.heise.de/security/news/meldung/86730
And for the majority of the
Karel Kulhavy wrote:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 04:46:26PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
This means everyone should have our latest patches installed.
[...]
*Solution/Vendor Information/Workaround*
The OpenBSD team has released a security fix to correct the mbuf
problem, it is available as a
If I run the command
# pfctl -vsr
I get counters started from the last time I loaded the rule set.
Is there a way to find out the Date and Time I last loaded the rule set
so that
I can know the length of time it took to acquire x number of packets, etc?
I see a line for Status: Enabled ...
Hi
I have donated, my hard earned. I don't involve myself commercially
in OBSD but I listen.
This is idiotic, a big hole was found and the devs pissed about
because they didn't want to admit it.
OBSD's strength is in being open, be open.
Move on and end this.
Theo, chill out.
Cheers
Rich
Lars Hansson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And for the majority of the worlds population that doesn't speak German
this says exactly what?
The article claims that the OpenBSD developers tried to deny that the
ICMPv6 bug is a remotely exploitable security hole.
Regards, Frank
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007, Joachim Schipper wrote:
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 09:54:16AM +0100, Karel Kulhavy wrote:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 04:46:26PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
This means everyone should have our latest patches installed.
*Solution/Vendor Information/Workaround*
The OpenBSD
Lars Hansson wrote:
And for the majority of the worlds population that doesn't speak German
this says exactly what?
http://www.heise-security.co.uk/news/86757
Lars Hansson wrote:
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 10:08:02 +0100
Karel Kulhavy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.heise.de/security/news/meldung/86730
And for the majority of the worlds population that doesn't speak German
this says exactly what?
Hello,
It says more or less:
That the OpenBSD
2007/3/16, Karel Kulhavy [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Who's drawing those OpenBSD cartoons like
http://www.openbsd.org/images/openbsd41_cover.gif
They are cool. Can Theo draw so well or does he employ an artist?
CL
It's Ty Semaka (http://www.tysemaka.com/), he did all the graphics and
lyrics in
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 11:23:59 +0100
Frank Tegtmeyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The article claims that the OpenBSD developers tried to deny that the
ICMPv6 bug is a remotely exploitable security hole.
Aha. Slow newsday in Germany, eh?
--
Lars Hansson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 2007/03/16 11:02, Alexander Hall wrote:
I added block quick inet6 to pf.conf.
I obviously do not use IPv6.
IPv6 link-local (which doesn't need any configuration, it's enabled
by default) can be a useful backup to have in the event of accidentally
breaking IPv4 (missing 'alias' to ifconfig(8)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 03/16/2007 10:43:44 AM:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This also means that every time I want to dump a fs I have to reset
the
nodump flags for all the files in those directories I don't want to
include as newer files won't keep that.
Since dump does not traverse
Miod Vallat wrote:
You need an empty line before each target... (here, bsd.acpi)
I should know better than to correct a developer, but apart from
that it would look better and help avoiding issues with trailing
backslashes (which should not be there anyway), this is not
really _needed_, is
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 21:22:58 +1100
Richard Thornton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is idiotic, a big hole was found and the devs pissed about
because they didn't want to admit it.
Say what? Didn't want to admit it? In what alternative universe was
this?
OBSD's strength is in being open, be
Greetings!
As i happen to speak german, here's a small summary:
The article, which is from the 14th of March, quotes an Article from
the 13th where heise.de reported on the fix that has been quite an
issue here on the mailing list.
The article then goes on to state that n article by core
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 05:56:03PM +0800, Lars Hansson wrote:
http://www.heise.de/security/news/meldung/86730
And for the majority of the worlds population that doesn't speak German
this says exactly what?
It looks like some kind of (deliberate?) misinterpretation of the
Core report. Heise
hi gurus,
how will i configure sshd to allow only one username at a time.
example:
on pc1 ssh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
on pc2 ssh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
now what i like to happen is ssh on pc2 should be drop bec. the user
root is already connected from pc1.
is it possible with to configure
http://www.tysemaka.com/openbsd.html
Karel Kulhavy wrote:
Who's drawing those OpenBSD cartoons like
http://www.openbsd.org/images/openbsd41_cover.gif
They are cool. Can Theo draw so well or does he employ an artist?
CL
is this a second remote hole in default install?
--
almir
Stiphane Chausson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Report states that OpenBSD developers played down critical vulnerability
Report states that you can either choose spam about every single crash
in the system fixed which would lead to a couple of security
advisory spam every week if we were serious
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 09:54:47AM +0100, Vincent GROSS wrote:
On 3/16/07, Karel Kulhavy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.coresecurity.com/index.php5?module=ContentModaction=itemid=1703
says:
Vulnerable Packages
OpenBSD 4.1 prior to Feb. 26th, 2006.
OpenBSD 4.0 Current
OpenBSD 4.0 Stable
This piece of news from the heise security newsticker has been sent to
you by Martin Schrvder [EMAIL PROTECTED]. The sender's address has
not been verified. If you doubt the sender's authenticy please ignore
this mail.
This is idiotic, a big hole was found and the devs pissed about
because they didn't want to admit it.
Noone in OpenBSD is pissed off about this. We posted the bug fix as
soon as we became aware of the problem. The timeline goes like this:
1) We were told there was a mbuf crash, which could
wether the bug has really been fixed. Later, some reader told them
that this was related to the suggested workaround (scrub vs. block),
and today that statement has been removed. Without any comment.
The problem with scrub is that Core thought it was a sufficient
workaround. Itojun looked at
On Mar 16, 2007, at 6:20 AM, John Gould wrote:
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007, Joachim Schipper wrote:
Is it possible to fix OpenBSD 4.0 system without compiling
anything, by e. g.
somehow rewriting the file that contains the kernel? I have never
compiled
OpenBSD, ports etc. and don't have time to
Hi again!
Dammit now iv'e translated it altough there was an english version of
it online?
Better read the real version, not my sloppy transcript :)
Best regards,
Christian Fuchs
On Mar 16, 2007, at 11:27 AM, Ralph Gessner wrote:
Lars Hansson wrote:
And for the majority of the worlds
You need an empty line before each target... (here, bsd.acpi)
I should know better than to correct a developer, but apart from that
it would look better and help avoiding issues with trailing backslashes
(which should not be there anyway), this is not really _needed_, is it?
You're indeed
On 16/03/2007, at 8:56 PM, Lars Hansson wrote:
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 10:08:02 +0100
Karel Kulhavy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.heise.de/security/news/meldung/86730
And for the majority of the worlds population that doesn't speak
German
this says exactly what?
There is an English
Hi,
I tried today to update my packages with the
$sudo pkg_add -ui
command.
I found that it selected lower versions of the packages automatically :-(
as senn in the sample below.
Candidates for updating vim-7.0.109-gtk2 - vim-7.0.42-gtk2
Candidates for updating vlc-0.8.4ap7 - vlc-0.8.4ap6
On 16/03/07, Almir Karic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
is this a second remote hole in default install?
--
almir
http://www.openbsd.org/
You need to read the FAQ :
http://cvs.openbsd.org/faq/faq10.html#Patches
http://cvs.openbsd.org/faq/upgrade40.html
Read the ENTIRE FAQ, because it's there for a GOOD reason.
Marius
On 3/16/07, Karel Kulhavy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 09:54:47AM +0100, Vincent GROSS
Hello,
I've recently got a ral-based card and I have a problem in IBSS mode.
It seems that ral fails to send any kind of packets larger than
200 bytes (192 bytes + 8 bytes icmp header).
I want to use my ral-based card to connect to the freifunk network in
Berlin, Germany. (Freifunk can be
* Lars Hansson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-03-16 12:24]:
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 11:23:59 +0100
Frank Tegtmeyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The article claims that the OpenBSD developers tried to deny that the
ICMPv6 bug is a remotely exploitable security hole.
Aha. Slow newsday in Germany, eh?
no,
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 12:09:28PM +0100, Karel Kulhavy wrote:
| I am not following anything - just installed OpenBSD 4.0 from a CD. What
should
| I follow, then?
|
| In other operating system the concept of upgrading is straightforward -
Windows
| ask you and you press OK, in Gentoo Linux you
Hi,
On Friday, 16. March 2007 12:09, Karel Kulhavy wrote:
I am not following anything - just installed OpenBSD 4.0 from a CD. What
should I follow, then?
That's your choice.
If you just want a stable and reliable OpenBSD then install -release (that's
what you did). If you want to keep it
On 03/16/2007 02:51:48 AM, Kian Mohageri wrote:
Expectations aside, being condescending is never warranted.
Both
Karl and Martin did just that.
I did not intend to be condesending and apologise if it
was taken that way.
Karl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Free Software: You don't pay back, you pay
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [070316 03:58]:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 15/03/2007 19:26:48:
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trying to dump a filesystem with nodump flags on some folders results
in
these folders been dumped anyway, even on higher level dump and even
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007, Jason Dixon wrote:
You're welcome to use my unsupported -stable kernel that I make available for
aac users. Please read the aac.README for more details.
http://colo2.dixongroup.net/releases/unsupported/4.0-stable-20070314/i386/
P.S. As Joachim mentions, you have to
2007/3/16, Karl O. Pinc [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 03/16/2007 02:51:48 AM, Kian Mohageri wrote:
Expectations aside, being condescending is never warranted.
Both
Karl and Martin did just that.
I did not intend to be condesending and apologise if it
was taken that way.
Same here. It was a
In other operating system the concept of upgrading is straightforward -
Windows
ask you and you press OK, in Gentoo Linux you type a magic sequence of
magic
commands and your system is up to date.
In OpenBSD, you type a logical sequence of logical commands and your system
is up to date. No
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007, Tobias Weisserth wrote:
A nice newbie site explaining this with examples is www.openbsd101.com, if
you
don't understand the OpenBSD FAQ.
Thanks for posting that one. It hadn't turned up in any of my searches
and if it was in any documents I already looked at, I must have
On Mar 16, 2007, at 9:53 AM, Diana Eichert wrote:
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007, Jason Dixon wrote:
You're welcome to use my unsupported -stable kernel that I make
available for aac users. Please read the aac.README for more
details.
http://colo2.dixongroup.net/releases/unsupported/4.0-
On Mar 16, 2007, at 4:09 AM, Karel Kulhavy wrote:
snip
I am not following anything
That's obvious.
- just installed OpenBSD 4.0 from a CD.
What should
I follow, then?
In other operating system the concept of upgrading is
straightforward - Windows
ask you and you press OK, in Gentoo Linux
On 3/15/07, x x [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I on
Ok, I'm using 4.0 from the FTP install for the sets, I still have find
how to get the ports installed, and wanted to see if, and how, to get K
3.5.6 installed, or should I just use what's ever in the ftp directory
for 4.0.
So you don't
Hi,
Could someone who submit dmesg with GA-M61PM-S2 motherboard be so kind
and send it to me off the list with `sysctl hw' output. Thanks in advance.
On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 11:30:33PM -0600, Jonathan Gray wrote:
CVSROOT: /cvs
Module name: src
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 3/16/07, Karel Kulhavy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 11:52:44AM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 10:26:23AM +, Gaby Vanhegan wrote:
Hi,
Reading the security advisory for the ipv6 buffer issue, the
workaround is to block inet6 traffic in
PS Besides the aac stuff I noticed marc-20070203. What is marc?
MARC is a top secret project only US government agencies and their
contractors know about.
The name stands for :
Moderately
Advanced
Rumours
Creator
and is being used as part of an evil conspiracy to reduce the
On Fri, 2007-03-16 at 11:09 +0100, Alexander Hall wrote:
Ryan Corder wrote:
alternatively, I did this and it seemed to work
pass out on bge0 from inside to { any, !outside }
pass out on bge0 from inside to { any, !llcidr }
The above is an overkill equivalent to
pass out on bge0
* tony sarendal [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-03-16 08:15:18]:
I don't see how your excuses apply here.
I can't help this =) : I noticed your quote about metaphysics. Well
it's metaphysically ridiculous to even expect excuses from people
who owe you nothing.
If Theo made a mistake by not sending
* Karel Kulhavy [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-03-16 12:09:28]:
In other operating system the concept of upgrading is straightforward -
Windows
ask you and you press OK, in Gentoo Linux you type a magic sequence of magic
commands and your system is up to date. But in OpenBSD it seems that the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 03/16/2007 02:40:38 PM:
[...]
I'm working on a patch. The hold up is digging through restore to
make
sure I do this correctly. No point in frogging up dumpinomap,
dumpdirmap, and usedinomap if restore doesn't do what you expect.
Why should this
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007, Miod Vallat wrote:
PS Besides the aac stuff I noticed marc-20070203. What is marc?
MARC is a top secret project only US government agencies and their
contractors know about.
The name stands for :
Moderately
Advanced
Rumours
Creator
and is being used as part of an evil
Miod Vallat wrote:
PS Besides the aac stuff I noticed marc-20070203. What is marc?
MARC is a top secret project only US government agencies and their
contractors know about.
The name stands for :
Moderately
Advanced
Rumours
Creator
and is being used as part of an evil conspiracy to
On 3/16/07, Travers Buda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* tony sarendal [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-03-16 08:15:18]:
I don't see how your excuses apply here.
I can't help this =) : I noticed your quote about metaphysics. Well
it's metaphysically ridiculous to even expect excuses from people
who owe
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 05:50:45PM +0530, Siju George wrote:
Hi,
I tried today to update my packages with the
$sudo pkg_add -ui
command.
I found that it selected lower versions of the packages automatically :-(
as senn in the sample below.
Candidates for updating
Is it true that Puffy is not here because of Theo's concerns about
his copyrighted Puffy logo?
http://misc.allbsd.de/Kampagnen/NoBlob/NoBlob-en-Poster.jpg
I also couldn't use Puffy logo on Ronja because then I wouldn't be able to talk
about OpenBSD negatively if it came out there is some serious
On Mar 16, 2007, at 12:18 PM, Karel Kulhavy wrote:
I think Theo should stop being paranoid about his Puffy.
You don't understand! Theo's just trying to protect us. Handling the
deadly
pufferfish is very dangerous, and best left to experts!
--
Jack J. Woehr
Director of Development
Absolute
On 3/16/07, Martin Schrvder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip blah blah blah...]
After all the kvetching and sensationalism that's characterized both
this thread and the release of this errata, there's a few things I
wanted to point out. Theo's already put out the timeline and
circumstances around
On 3/16/07, Karel Kulhavy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it true that Puffy is not here because of Theo's concerns about
his copyrighted Puffy logo?
http://misc.allbsd.de/Kampagnen/NoBlob/NoBlob-en-Poster.jpg
I also couldn't use Puffy logo on Ronja because then I wouldn't be able to talk
about
Is it true that Puffy is not here because of Theo's concerns about
his copyrighted Puffy logo?
http://misc.allbsd.de/Kampagnen/NoBlob/NoBlob-en-Poster.jpg
No. That is false. Whoever told you that lied to you.
I also couldn't use Puffy logo on Ronja because then I wouldn't be able to
talk
Yeah that's what I was thinking... you not only eliminate a single point
of failure, but you also split your pps throughput requirements in half.
Danno
Danno.appliedi.net/drupal/
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Martin Toft
Sent:
On Fri, 2007-03-16 at 19:29 +0100, Almir Karic wrote:
the {} thingy is strictly text expansion, which means your rules expand to:
pass out on bge0 from inside to any
pass out on bge0 from inside to !outside
pass out on bge0 from inside to any
pass out on bge0 from inside to !llcidr
if you
On 3/16/07, Marc Espie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wait for 4.2. Sorry, it's not implemented yet. pkg_add doesn't really
know how to compare versions. And in case you're wondering, it's harder
than it seems...
Thankyou so much marc for the reply :-)
In the mean time what would be the best way to
It'd be great if Theo could make a clear statement on Puffy, the same
as Marshall Kirk McKusick has for the daemon. I had cause to use a
variant of Marshall's beastie for a project which was marginally
within his published guidelines, and had no problem getting
permission.
On 3/16/07, Karel
** Reply to message from Ryan Corder [EMAIL PROTECTED] on
Fri, 16 Mar 2007 14:01:38 -0500
very simply, this thread could have ended a day or two ago if the
following process would have taken place:
1) is my syntax wrong? YES
2) OK, what is wrong with it? Pointed out and understood.
On 3/16/07, Karl O. Pinc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 03/16/2007 02:51:48 AM, Kian Mohageri wrote:
Yeah. Expectations aside, being condescending is never warranted.
We've all spent more time on this than it's worth, but I would
appreciate it if you'd point out any condescension in my
Hi,
Is it possible to make CARP to monitor an interface and if that
interface is down to switch to slave from master? (I know this is
possible with HSRP)
Thanks
--
Alex
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 01:26:39PM +, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
On 03/16/2007 03:54:16 AM, Karel Kulhavy wrote:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 04:46:26PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
This means everyone should have our latest patches installed.
[...]
*Solution/Vendor Information/Workaround*
* Karel Kulhavy [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-03-16 12:20]:
Is it true that Puffy is not here because of Theo's concerns about
his copyrighted Puffy logo?
http://misc.allbsd.de/Kampagnen/NoBlob/NoBlob-en-Poster.jpg
Hunh? a No Blob poster with FreeBSD on it? that's a
fucking joke. they're the
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 01:33:36PM +0100, Vincent GROSS wrote:
ok, I'll try to be clear :
there is a -current branch (HEAD in CVS technobabble).
nearly every six month, -current give birth to a release (CDs).
a release shall move as little as possible. but sometimes, (like now)
there is a
Alex Berdan wrote:
Hi,
Is it possible to make CARP to monitor an interface and if that
interface is down to switch to slave from master? (I know this is
possible with HSRP)
ifstated(8)
Thanks
One should also understand that the update process is supported in only one
direction: from older to newer, and from -stable to -current.
http://openbsd.org/faq/faq5.html
Is it possible to upgrade from 4.0-current to 4.1-stable?
CL
1 - 100 of 155 matches
Mail list logo
