I recently wrote Linus Torvalds asking why I don't see his name listed
on the OpenBSD donations page (http://www.openbsd.org/donations.html),
since I figured he uses OpenSSH.
This was the reply I got back:
From: Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tue, 10 Apr 2007 14:29:56 -0700 (PDT)
I suspect
Two points:
1. Please don't post private email. (Apologies if you obtained his
permission to post).
2. Who really cares? I'd much rather see contibutions from companies who
ship OpenSSH in their products and list SSH support as a feature on
their glossy brochures than shaking down other
I recently wrote Linus Torvalds asking why I don't see his name listed
on the OpenBSD donations page (http://www.openbsd.org/donations.html),
since I figured he uses OpenSSH.
Apart from the fact that was a private email from Linus to you and you
broadcast it publically (if you really did email
On 4/10/07, Damien Miller djm@ wrote:
Two points:
1. Please don't post private email. (Apologies if you obtained his
permission to post).
2. Who really cares? I'd much rather see contibutions from companies who
ship OpenSSH in their products and list SSH support as a feature on
their
On 4/10/07, anon trol [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not sure where to ask this; so, I thought I'd start here in misc
first.
I think I have convinced myself that I want to sponsor an architecture port
effort. Specifically, I would like to see OpenBSD ported to the Routerboard
532 (IDT MIPS32 4Kc
On Wed, 11 Apr 2007 16:27:55 +0930
Adam Hawes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I recently wrote Linus Torvalds asking why I don't see his name
listed on the OpenBSD donations page
(http://www.openbsd.org/donations.html), since I figured he uses
OpenSSH.
Apart from the fact that was a private
On Wed, 11 Apr 2007, Timo Schoeler wrote:
Which commercial *NIX that's still alive is more of a security thread
and covered with the same level of stability problems as GNU/Linux? One
really stops counting remote exploits for GNU/Linux very soon,
otherwise one would have to dedicate one's
On Wed, 11 Apr 2007 17:27:48 +1000 (EST)
Damien Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 11 Apr 2007, Timo Schoeler wrote:
Which commercial *NIX that's still alive is more of a security
thread and covered with the same level of stability problems as
GNU/Linux? One really stops counting
I have questionable ntp foo, searching through the misc@ archives along
with reading the FAQ has only gotten me so far. I have a Garmin 18 GPS:
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000196BW6/104-8542380-5084714
...which is connected to the serial port of a Sun Ultra 10. I am unable to
determine
On Wed, 11 Apr 2007, James Hartley wrote:
I have questionable ntp foo, searching through the misc@ archives along
with reading the FAQ has only gotten me so far. I have a Garmin 18 GPS:
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000196BW6/104-8542380-5084714
...which is connected to the serial
Hi there!
I need to know if Atheros AR5005G Wifi Network Adapter and Marvell
Yukon 88E8038 PCI-E Fast Ethernet Controller are already supported in
OBSD 4.0 or will be in the next release. I bought me a laptop built-in
with these and I'd love to have OpenBSD on it rather than any other OS.
I
Hi all,
Is it possible to flush rules for a specific interface under OpenBSD 4.0? For
example, I have two dsl lines and i would use only one pf.conf file with
ifstated. When one link comes down I would like to do something like this:
pfctl -i ext2_if -F rules (only flush actually rules for
On Wed, 11 Apr 2007, James Hartley wrote:
On 4/11/07, Otto Moerbeek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Very likely you Sun uses different serial ports than cua00. Check your
dmesg to see which driver is uses, then use the driver man page to
determine the /dev node to use.
I'm must be blind
On 4/11/07, Otto Moerbeek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Very likely you Sun uses different serial ports than cua00. Check your
dmesg to see which driver is uses, then use the driver man page to
determine the /dev node to use.
I'm must be blind for I'm not seeing anything. dmesg below:
console
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
10/04/2007 - 08h14 - Atualizado em 10/04/2007
Nzmero de mortos apss o tsunami e terremoto que atingiram as Ilhas
Salomco, no Oceano Pacmfico, no zltimo dia 2, aumentou para 43. E ha
ainda cerca de 60 pessoas desaparecidas. A informagco foi publicada na
edigco desta terga-feira.
On Wednesday 11 April 2007 03:06, Kernel Monkey wrote:
On 4/10/07, Damien Miller djm@ wrote:
Two points:
1. Please don't post private email. (Apologies if you obtained his
permission to post).
2. Who really cares? I'd much rather see contibutions from companies who
ship OpenSSH
GMT is the timezone, UTC is the time.
P
jared r r spiegel wrote:
On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 06:17:58PM -0400, Nick ! wrote:
On 4/10/07, Markus Bergkvist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
'date -u' on a 4.0 -stable will give something like
Tue Apr 10 22:03:24 GMT 2007
but shouldn't it be
Seg, 2007-04-09 C s 18:29 +0100, Jeroen Massar escreveu:
GPL is good though if you want to force people to give back the code to
you so that you can use it in your own dual-licensed projects.
This shows a fundamental lack of understanding of the way both the GPL
and generic copyright work.
hi,
As you might know, the OpenBSD web pages are translated in a number of
different languages as explained on
http://www.openbsd.org/translation.html
Currently, the [nl] translation team, consisting of Jasper and myself,
is looking for new contributors who can maintain the existing translation
[set the topic to make it nice and clear, this has nothing to do with
bcw(4) for a long time now, actually the whole thread avoided it]
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
Seg, 2007-04-09 C s 18:29 +0100, Jeroen Massar escreveu:
GPL is good though if you want to force people to give back the code to
Nice bounce...
Hi. This is the qmail-send program at chaossolutions.org.
I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses.
This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
64.233.167.27 does not like recipient.
Remote host said:
I've got two OpenBSD 3.9 firewall/router in a CARP configuration. They are
both IBM NetFinity 40004 servers with dual P3 650MHz chips and 512MB of
memory each. Twice now, the backup firewall has disappeared from my Nagios
monitoring and I've found (through remote serial console) only a ddb{1}
[correct the subject] ;)
Qua, 2007-04-11 C s 14:26 +0100, Jeroen Massar escreveu:
[set the topic to make it nice and clear, this has nothing to do with
bcw(4) for a long time now, actually the whole thread avoided it]
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
Seg, 2007-04-09 C s 18:29 +0100, Jeroen
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
[correct the subject] ;)
Qua, 2007-04-11 C s 14:26 +0100, Jeroen Massar escreveu:
[set the topic to make it nice and clear, this has nothing to do with
bcw(4) for a long time now, actually the whole thread avoided it]
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
Seg,
Now that the subject is accurate, it's more obvious than ever that this
discussion doesn't belong here. Not only is it not relevant, but it's
been discussed to death many times, in many places.
--
Darrin Chandler| Phoenix BSD User Group | MetaBUG
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 04:18:41PM +0100, Jeroen Massar wrote:
Good that I PGP sign my messages [...]
And the mailing list strips your signatures:
[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature which
had a name of signature.asc]
On Mon, 9 Apr 2007 20:20:33 -0500
Marco Peereboom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
GPL is as free as communism.
Please add this to fortune!
--
Massimo.run();
She's the kind of girl who climbed the ladder of success wrong by
wrong. -- Mae West
Seriously... this is a troll.
This is like electronic insurgency designed to get OBSD supporters in
another huff with the Linux world... hasn't bcw(4) provided enough for
that purpose?
danno
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Martin
Sent:
Out of curiousity, why do a routerboard, when you can use something like the
following:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813185094
On 4/11/07, bofh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Out of curiousity, why do a routerboard, when you can use something like the
following:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813185094
Well, I would like to see the router board simply because, I would
like to make a router / switch
The great thing about it is that people perusing the archives will see
the trollfest and probably not get this far to see us cluing in and
being calm and civil.
-Nick
On 4/11/07, Dan Farrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Seriously... this is a troll.
This is like electronic insurgency designed to
On 4/11/07, bofh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Out of curiousity, why do a routerboard, when you can use something like the
following:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813185094
Power consumption, heat, noise, unnecessary parts...
Greg
We have several production web servers and I am trying to figure out a way
to removing world write support from chmod. I have already written a wrapper
for the chmod command, but it does not seem to work within sftp; has anyone
encountered anything that could help in implementing this, or have any
On 4/11/07, Joshua Gimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We have several production web servers and I am trying to figure out a way
to removing world write support from chmod. I have already written a wrapper
for the chmod command, but it does not seem to work within sftp; has anyone
encountered
On Wed, 11 Apr 2007 12:57:45 -0400
bofh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Out of curiousity, why do a routerboard, when you can use something
like the following:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813185094
maybe some are not that convinced using x86? ;)
On Apr 11, 2007, at 10:26 AM, Dan Farrell wrote:
Seriously... this is a troll.
This is like electronic insurgency designed to get OBSD supporters in
another huff with the Linux world... hasn't bcw(4) provided enough for
that purpose?
Bless you , Danno. When you're right, you're right.
On Wed, 11 Apr 2007 16:25:14 +0200
Massimo Lusetti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 9 Apr 2007 20:20:33 -0500
Marco Peereboom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
GPL is as free as communism.
Please add this to fortune!
--
Massimo.run();
She's the kind of girl who climbed the ladder of success
On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 12:05 -0500, Sam Fourman Jr. wrote:
Well, I would like to see the router board simply because, I would
like to make a router / switch device to replace a Linksys 54G Router,
maybe 3 or 4 lan ports and a 1 or 2 MPCI slots, 1 for hardware crypto
and the other for a wireless
I had to set up a linux firewall the other day, and I used the iptables
script generating program shorewall.
While pulling my hair over how ugly the iptables stuff (even via shorewall)
is compared to OpenBSDs nice clean PF syntax, I did find one very nice
feature in shorewall - safe restart.
When
Timo Schoeler wrote:
On Wed, 11 Apr 2007 16:25:14 +0200
Massimo Lusetti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 9 Apr 2007 20:20:33 -0500
Marco Peereboom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
GPL is as free as communism.
Please add this to fortune!
--
Massimo.run();
She's the kind of girl who climbed the
On 4/11/07, Bret Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 12:05 -0500, Sam Fourman Jr. wrote:
Well, I would like to see the router board simply because, I would
like to make a router / switch device to replace a Linksys 54G Router,
maybe 3 or 4 lan ports and a 1 or 2 MPCI slots,
Did you read pfctl(8) ?
On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 10:44:44AM -0700, christian johansson wrote:
I had to set up a linux firewall the other day, and I used the iptables
script generating program shorewall.
While pulling my hair over how ugly the iptables stuff (even via shorewall)
is compared to
On Wed, 11 Apr 2007 20:08:44 +0200
Marc Balmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Timo Schoeler wrote:
On Wed, 11 Apr 2007 16:25:14 +0200
Massimo Lusetti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 9 Apr 2007 20:20:33 -0500
Marco Peereboom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
GPL is as free as communism.
Please
Hi,
I recently installed OpenBSD-current from the latest snapshot on my Acer
Travelmate 4202WLMI laptop and I'm having few issues with it.
First is the USB -performance. I have USB-drive and when moving data between
it and my laptop I get around 5-7MB/sec although in Linux I get 17-20MB/sec.
Hi
Im trying to build boot for OpenBSD 4.0. Ive pasted the output below
from what I get if I do a make clean in /sys/arch/i386/stand/boot and
then do a make in /sys.
The problem is that the boot file that is being created in
/sys/arch/i386/stand/boot is 322K, whereas the original boot was only
On 4/11/07, christian johansson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I had to set up a linux firewall the other day, and I used the iptables
script generating program shorewall.
While pulling my hair over how ugly the iptables stuff (even via shorewall)
is compared to OpenBSDs nice clean PF syntax, I did
On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 08:20:51PM +0200, Timo Schoeler wrote:
On Wed, 11 Apr 2007 20:08:44 +0200 Marc Balmer wrote:
[X] -- communism isn't as bad as the GPL ;)
[X] marco is a communist
no; if so, he's as good as communist as George W. Bush as president.
WTF! What the hell does GPL,
On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 02:44:10PM -0400, Jeff Quast wrote:
On 4/11/07, christian johansson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
feature in shorewall - safe restart.
Is there a ready made script accomplishing this for openbsd / pf? Or any
plans of building such functionality?
I've done this with pf.
I'm trying to setup an ipsec tunnel between an openbsd and a windows
box using X.509 certificates. Phase 1 gets successfully negotiated but
then things crap out at step 1 of phase 2 and I don't have a clue
what's wrong. Any thoughts?
Isakmpd debug messages just after phase 1 is negotiated and
For the same filename, sometimes you have to specify a different filename to
scp, depending on whether the file is on remote system or local one.
I have created a remote file whose filename a b is 3 chars long - ASCII codes
97, 32, 98
scp '[EMAIL PROTECTED]:a b' .
doesn't work - prints:
scp: a:
Wow.
Seriously, I think the real 'bug' is your file naming conventions.
Who would anyone specifically want to name a file with a space in it...
and if breaks on scp, where else will that screwy naming convention
break as well?
I'm sure you'll give some really good reason why the files have to
On 4/11/07 5:45 PM, Darrin Chandler wrote:
Now that the subject is accurate, it's more obvious than ever that this
discussion doesn't belong here. Not only is it not relevant, but it's
been discussed to death many times, in many places.
Clearly not to death and people here are seriously
On 4/11/07, Dan Farrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Karel Kulhavy
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2007 3:47 PM
To: OpenBSD
Subject: scp problem with remote filename escaping
Sounds like a bug to me - the escaping for the remote shell
On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 01:28:28PM -0600, Roy Kim wrote:
I'm trying to setup an ipsec tunnel between an openbsd and a windows
box using X.509 certificates. Phase 1 gets successfully negotiated but
then things crap out at step 1 of phase 2 and I don't have a clue
what's wrong. Any thoughts?
On 4/11/07, Nick ! [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/11/07, Dan Farrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Karel Kulhavy
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2007 3:47 PM
To: OpenBSD
Subject: scp problem with remote filename escaping
Sounds
snip
I agree, spaces in filenames should be avoided. But spaces in
filenames are legal, so programs need to support that; this seems like
a case scp was never tested against because no one uses files with
those names.
I scp'd a file called 'a b' to an openbsd server here, then scp'd it
back a
On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 10:25:03PM +0200, chefren wrote:
On 4/11/07 5:45 PM, Darrin Chandler wrote:
Now that the subject is accurate, it's more obvious than ever that this
discussion doesn't belong here. Not only is it not relevant, but it's
been discussed to death many times, in many places.
On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 04:17:38PM -0400, Nick ! wrote:
On 4/11/07, Dan Farrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Karel Kulhavy
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2007 3:47 PM
To: OpenBSD
Subject: scp problem with remote filename escaping
On 2007/04/11 13:41, Bryan Irvine wrote:
snip
I agree, spaces in filenames should be avoided. But spaces in
filenames are legal, so programs need to support that; this seems like
a case scp was never tested against because no one uses files with
those names.
I scp'd a file called 'a b' to
On Apr 11, 2007, at 2:25 PM, chefren wrote:
Clearly not to death and people here are seriously interested in
pro and contra arguments.
Hey, if you young folks still have all that typing power in your
fingers, please bang on the
code for BSD some more!
--
Jack J. Woehr
Director of
Window's firewall is off. Dump is as follows:
# tcpdump -i sis0 'esp or (udp and (port 500 or port 4500))'
tcpdump: listening on sis0, link-type EN10MB
21:06:26.205252 work.isakmp home.isakmp: isakmp v1.0 exchange ID_PROT
cookie: 1a0f8d5bb2637ce2- msgid:
len:
On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 10:02:50PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2007/04/11 13:41, Bryan Irvine wrote:
scp [EMAIL PROTECTED]:a\ b .
you have to escape to *both* your local shell, and the remote shell
This has always seemed silly to me. Does anyone intentionally use
$ scp host:a b .
On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 04:33:32PM -0400, Nick ! wrote:
Karel, single quotes cause backslashes to be backslashes, instead of
escape chars (*except* if it's a backslash in front of a single quote,
so that you can escape single quotes to include them).
No, backslashes have no special meaning
On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 04:41:41PM -0500, Matthew R. Dempsky wrote:
On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 10:02:50PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2007/04/11 13:41, Bryan Irvine wrote:
scp [EMAIL PROTECTED]:a\ b .
you have to escape to *both* your local shell, and the remote shell
This has
So, the man page should say 'Display the UTC in GMT time'?
If I understand it correctly, UTC is the timezone
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_8601#UTC
/Markus
Pierre Lamy wrote:
GMT is the timezone, UTC is the time.
P
jared r r spiegel wrote:
On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 06:17:58PM -0400, Nick
On 4/11/07, Joshua Gimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/11/07, Nick ! [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
you're not really
planning on security by obscurity are you?
The wrapper will work because the users that are doing this are doing it out
of ignorance and not with malicious intentions.
This is
On 4/11/07, Nick ! [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
you're not really
planning on security by obscurity are you?
The wrapper will work because the users that are doing this are doing it out
of ignorance and not with malicious intentions. If the only thing that can
be done is to change the sftp
On 11 Apr 2007 at 16:33, Joshua Gimer wrote:
On 4/11/07, Nick ! [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
you're not really
planning on security by obscurity are you?
The wrapper will work because the users that are doing this are doing it
out of ignorance and not with malicious intentions. If the
On Mon, 2007-04-09 at 22:34 -0400, Jason Dixon wrote:
GPL advocates claim their license prevents commercial entities from
stealing their freedom. These are the same people who have no
problem giving up their freedoms (in the form of NDA's, closed-source
kernel modules, etc) to the
On 4/11/07, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm looking to build on OpenBSD 4.0 (4.1?) a wireless access point for a small
network. I would like to hear what cards have proven to be the most
effective in this arena. I am very interested in small form factor machines
with possible onboard
On 4/11/07, Shawn K. Quinn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2007-04-09 at 22:34 -0400, Jason Dixon wrote:
GPL advocates claim their license prevents commercial entities from
stealing their freedom. These are the same people who have no
problem giving up their freedoms (in the form of NDA's,
A recent thread (04/04/2007) on this list showed that the ralink
chipsets are well supported by OpenBSD.
I think any wireless card with a ralink chipset will do the job.
See http://openbsd.org/i386.html#hardware (Wireless Ethernet Adapters)
if you need more information.
Maxime
Peter wrote:
I'm
I'm sure you'll give some really good reason why the files have to be
named that way...
Try admining boxes which are used by EvilOS users - all of their
files will be called My\ blah.
I scp'd a file called 'a b' to an openbsd server here, then scp'd it
back a couple time in different ways. It worked only when using the
quotes AND escaping, like so:
scp [EMAIL PROTECTED]:a\ b .
That's because of the shell.
The shell on the client sees the quotes and doesn't escape the
On 4/11/07, Karel Kulhavy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For the same filename, sometimes you have to specify a different filename
to
scp, depending on whether the file is on remote system or local one.
I have created a remote file whose filename a b is 3 chars long - ASCII
codes
97, 32, 98
On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 02:18:28AM +0200, Maxime DERCHE wrote:
A recent thread (04/04/2007) on this list showed that the ralink
chipsets are well supported by OpenBSD.
If I recall, there was also talk about lower signal strength with
ralink. For an access point this is important, but could be
The usual recommendation is ral(4)
Or acx(4), ath(4), rtw(4), rum(4), wi(4).
On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 04:11:48PM -0400, Dan Farrell wrote:
Wow.
Seriously, I think the real 'bug' is your file naming conventions.
Bug is when behaviour is different from documentation. What is the behaviour
and what is the documentation in the case of my file naming conventions?
Who
My advice would be ral(4) I have also used ath(4) however the G mode
does not work real well, I would suspect that ral(4) would be one of
the first devices to support 80.211n. in OpenBSD (Someone correct me
if I am wrong on this)
Sam Fourman Jr.
On 4/11/07, Darrin Chandler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original message -
Or acx(4), ath(4), rtw(4), rum(4), wi(4).
I thought we shouldn't support ath?
On 4/11/07, pedro la peu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The usual recommendation is ral(4)
Or acx(4), ath(4), rtw(4), rum(4), wi(4).
On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 10:55:29PM +0200, Simon Effenberg wrote:
On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 04:17:38PM -0400, Nick ! wrote:
On 4/11/07, Dan Farrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Karel Kulhavy
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2007 3:47
On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 10:02:50PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2007/04/11 13:41, Bryan Irvine wrote:
snip
I agree, spaces in filenames should be avoided. But spaces in
filenames are legal, so programs need to support that; this seems like
a case scp was never tested against because
On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 01:13:16AM +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 04:41:41PM -0500, Matthew R. Dempsky wrote:
On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 10:02:50PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2007/04/11 13:41, Bryan Irvine wrote:
scp [EMAIL PROTECTED]:a\ b .
you have
On 4/11/07, Otto Moerbeek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sab0 at ebus0 addr 40-40007f ipl 43: rev 3.2
sabtty0 at sab0 port 0
sabtty1 at sab0 port 1
man sab gives: /dev/ttyh[0-1]
No separate callout device, it looks like.
Thanks for getting back to me. Specifying /dev/ttyh0 (or /dev/ttyh1)
chefren wrote:
Clearly not to death and people here are seriously interested in pro and
contra arguments.
People are interested in discussing a lot things but that doesn't mean
those discussions belong on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Lars Hansson
is undeadly down or do i need to smoke another blut? dns not responding:
http://dnsreport.com/tools/dnsreport.ch?domain=undeadly.org
regards,
elpinguim
On Apr 11, 2007, at 11:20 PM, elpinguim wrote:
is undeadly down or do i need to smoke another blut? dns not
responding:
http://dnsreport.com/tools/dnsreport.ch?domain=undeadly.org
I noticed this three hours ago and emailed Daniel. The NS records
for undeadly.org have disappeared from
On 4/11/07, Jason Dixon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 11, 2007, at 11:20 PM, elpinguim wrote:
is undeadly down or do i need to smoke another blut? dns not
responding:
http://dnsreport.com/tools/dnsreport.ch?domain=undeadly.org
I noticed this three hours ago and emailed Daniel. The NS
UTC aka Coordinated Universal Time, is the right now is right now for
all of us time, and is coordinated among several entities, irregardless
of the timezone the parties are in. GMT is a timezone with an offset of
zero. All timezones are differentials off of UTC; you couldn't just say
that in
On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 11:48:04PM -0400, Jason Dixon wrote:
Unfortunately, it's the middle of the night
where he's at, probably dreaming of anything but missing NS records. :)
needs more benzedrine :(
--
jared
On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 05:01:40PM -0500, Matthew R. Dempsky wrote:
On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 04:33:32PM -0400, Nick ! wrote:
Karel, single quotes cause backslashes to be backslashes, instead of
escape chars (*except* if it's a backslash in front of a single quote,
so that you can escape
On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 04:05:36AM +0200, Karel Kulhavy wrote:
scp needs one (1) \ for one space in case of remote file and zero (0) \ in
case
of local one. The extra \'s are for bash but bash is irrelevant in this case.
It's just one possible method of calling the process. Another method is
On Wed, 11 Apr 2007, James Hartley wrote:
On 4/11/07, Otto Moerbeek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sab0 at ebus0 addr 40-40007f ipl 43: rev 3.2
sabtty0 at sab0 port 0
sabtty1 at sab0 port 1
man sab gives: /dev/ttyh[0-1]
No separate callout device, it looks like.
Thanks for
93 matches
Mail list logo
