On Mon, 25 Jun 2007, Vortechz wrote:
> I hope there are people using/testing/developing rthreads out there who can
> explain to me why
> syscall getthrid fails with SIGSYS on my system, 4.1-release.
>
> 1. I have RTHREADS defined in my kernel. I have checked that the
> rthread code is included at
Im having some trouble accessing certain sites from my laptop going
through a obsd router doing nat
I have 2 tested configurations
Laptop--->Cisco1721[doing nat]--->internet > msn.com
and
Laptop--->Cisco1721--(gre0)>Openbsd[doing nat]--->internet > msn.com
in the first setup
Good Day,
My apologies if this question has been asked a million times before. I want to
know if there is a good book out there to learn C++ on UNIX/Linux. I have
browsed Amazon but almost all the books available there are either Windows based
or they have very bad reviews.
I have been doing LAN
On Mon, 25 Jun 2007 10:48:20 -0700, John N. Brahy wrote:
>I was wondering what the general census on port knocking in the OpenBSD
>community is. I like the idea of hiding services but I don't like the
>idea of relying on a piece of code that's not part of the OpenBSD core.
>I know when it comes do
> I fully understand your reasoning. Under normal circumstances users
> authenticate from their desktop machines (which is a unique IP) and
> therefore not a problem. However, sometimes they are VNC'd into servers
> (more CPU power) and want to access resources behind the internal
> 'firewall'.
This is related and may be of interest to some ppl. I have posted some
modifications to the excellent LiveCD instructions by Andreas Bihlmaier to
create a Live USB (if you have a USB key thingie and you want to save space)
http://openbsd-wiki.org/index.php?title=LiveUSB
G
On 6/24/07, Alex Kwan
> In short, I know the consequences of authenticating multiple users from
> the same IP... is there an easy way to turn off this authpf feature? ;)
You still don't understand.
It's not a feature. It is a requirement.
If you don't like it, then you can't provide any of the functional
parts tha
Bob Beck-2 wrote:
>
> The point of authpf is for the user to say "this IP
> is me" - if that IP could perhaps not be him, well, this
> is not an application for authpf. I.E. if your users
> are coming in from a NAT, you should rethink what you
> are doing.
>
> -Bob
>
I fully unde
On 6/25/07, Matthew Szudzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have successfully ported the relevant material from the NetBSD patches
thanks, good work.
On 6/25/07, Vortechz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I hope there are people using/testing/developing rthreads out there who can
explain to me why
syscall getthrid fails with SIGSYS on my system, 4.1-release.
it looks like you've done everything right. SIGSYS means the kernel
doesn't support the sy
Nope. That's how it is supposed to work.
The point of authpf is for the user to say "this IP
is me" - if that IP could perhaps not be him, well, this
is not an application for authpf. I.E. if your users
are coming in from a NAT, you should rethink what you
are doing.
-Bo
When multiple users with the same source IP want access through the firewall
authpf grants access to the newly authenticating user and kicks off the
previous user. Is there a way to turn off this behaviour so both users
maintain authpf tables?
Works:
1a. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -> authpf -> maintains l
Joachim Schipper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Start by putting in a disk that really should work - any factory-pressed
> disk. If OpenBSD understands this, it means that the disk drive is not
> completely unsupported or something stupid like that.
Ok, I have read discs with this, tho it took a f
On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 11:50:10AM +0200, Artur Litwinowicz wrote:
> Hi Philip,
>thank You match for answer and nice words :).
> I am starting be concern for my problem but my "love" for OpenBSD is
> stronger then sort problems (data on my web are sorted not correctly) and I
> do not want to c
On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 02:31:49PM -0500, Craig Brozefsky wrote:
> Joachim Schipper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > You are mounting the wrong device; try /dev/cd0a.
>
> Ah, I tried that earlier, this is what I get.:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/public_html/bbb$ sudo mount -t cd9660 /dev/cd0a
>
Joachim Schipper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> You are mounting the wrong device; try /dev/cd0a.
Ah, I tried that earlier, this is what I get.:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/public_html/bbb$ sudo mount -t cd9660 /dev/cd0a /mnt/cdrom
mount_cd9660: /dev/cd0a on /mnt/cdrom: Device not configured
[EMAIL
On Mon, 2007-06-25 at 10:48 -0700, John N. Brahy wrote:
> Hi Misc@,
>
>
>
> I was wondering what the general census on port knocking in the OpenBSD
> community is. I like the idea of hiding services but I don't like the
> idea of relying on a piece of code that's not part of the OpenBSD core.
>
On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 10:48:20AM -0700, John N. Brahy wrote:
> I know when it comes down to it, it's only hiding ports and not actually
> securing anything.
There, you've hit the nail on the head.
But it's worse. Go find some people using port knocking - you probably
know some. Ask them if they
2007/6/25, John N. Brahy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I was wondering what the general census on port knocking in the OpenBSD
community is. I like the idea of hiding services but I don't
List archives exist.
Best
Martin
On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 02:59:58PM -0400, stan wrote:
> Yes, I know it's a bad idea, but for reasons beyond my control, I
> need to provide a telnet service on an OpeBSD 4.0 machine.
> Unfortunately there does not seem to be a telnetd built by
> default.
>
> How can I get this daemon built?
Searc
On Mon, 25 Jun 2007, stan wrote:
Yes, I know it's a bad idea, but for reasons beyond my control, I need to
provide a telnet service on an OpeBSD 4.0 machine. Unfortunately there does
not seem to be a telnetd built by default.
Yes it was removed and you could've searched the archives:
http://op
Hi Misc@,
I was wondering what the general census on port knocking in the OpenBSD
community is. I like the idea of hiding services but I don't like the
idea of relying on a piece of code that's not part of the OpenBSD core.
I know when it comes down to it, it's only hiding ports and not actually
Jacob Yocom-Piatt wrote:
have two machines that are carped and have mysql databases on them.
one machine is the mysql master and the other a slave that replicates
the master. this keeps things ready for what i've just experienced:
mysql master machine goes down. now that a master failure has
o
Yes, I know it's a bad idea, but for reasons beyond my control, I need to
provide a telnet service on an OpeBSD 4.0 machine. Unfortunately there does
not seem to be a telnetd built by default.
How can I get this daemon built?
--
I'm sorry, no one here has any intentions of helping you with anyth
On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 11:48:14AM -0500, Craig Brozefsky wrote:
> I recently burned two DVDs with my new DVD burner and I am unable to
> mount them on my OpenBSD box using the same burner, tho my Linux
> laptop mounts them. I am running OpenBSD 4.1 amd64. Pleae let me
> know if there is any othe
For the archives:
After a lot of head scratching, I discovered that symlinking /var/www
to somewhere else using an absolute path causes problems such as what
I was seeing during install. It is normal since the root location
changes. Use relative symlinks.
Here are the packages (and their dependencies) that I install
to get a nice Xfce desktop:
xfce-utils
xfce4-session
xfce4-taskbar
xfdesktop
xfwm4
Nick
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Alex Kwan
Sent: Mon 6/25/2007 11:26 AM
To: OpenBSD general usage list
Subject: xf
On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 11:27:11PM -0400, Alex Feldman wrote:
> Hi Andrew
>
> You crash dump doesn't show that it crashed on san driver. I'm saying that
> this is not the problem with san driver but it doesn't show any driver
> related function in crash trace.
I do not see that either. However,
x11/xfce4
On 6/25/07, Alex Kwan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
I wanted to use xfce for my systems' windows manager, which packages are
must required? (I have install the X base).
thanks!
Alex
--
almir
Hello,
I see that OpenBSD 3.7 isakmpd and OpenBSD 4.0 isakmpd do not establish
security associations. I get an INVALID-PAYLOAD-TYPE message. isakmpd 3.7 does
not seem to understand payload RESERVED.
Is there a way I can run isakmpd 4.0 downgraded or any other way to get the
two of th
Hello,
I wanted to use xfce for my systems' windows manager, which packages are
must required? (I have install the X base).
thanks!
Alex
At 05:31 PM 6/25/2007 +0200, you wrote:
Hello,
Although aware of the general aversion against web gui's on this list
(which I understand) I still would like to be able to allow people to
manage their own zonefile.
Webmin will do what you wish, .. but it might take some scripting to manage
p
Hello,
Although aware of the general aversion against web gui's on this list
(which I understand) I still would like to be able to allow people to
manage their own zonefile.
Allowing so from within a webpage seems the most logical step for me.
Looking at the many webbased clients outthere I am
I hope there are people using/testing/developing rthreads out there who can
explain to me why
syscall getthrid fails with SIGSYS on my system, 4.1-release.
1. I have RTHREADS defined in my kernel. I have checked that the
rthread code is included at compile time, and I also tried this:
$ grep gett
OK...
I know I did not give enough information to allow people help.
So here are some more.
The firewall works fine running routed most of the time. It is
running 4.1-STABLE (below is a dmesg).
I see a lot of interrupts on both internal and external interfaces
sk0 and sk1. Something like 3600. T
> I have successfully ported the relevant material from the NetBSD patches
>
>
> http://cvsweb.netbsd.org/bsdweb.cgi/src/sys/compat/linux/common/linux_misc.c.diff?r1=1.140&r2=1.141
>
>
> http://cvsweb.netbsd.org/bsdweb.cgi/src/sys/compat/linux/common/linux_mmap.h.diff?r1=1.16&r2=1.17
>
> h
And here are the dmesgs before and after the latest snapshot update.
OpenBSD 4.1-current (GENERIC) #1122: Wed Jun 20 22:10:55 MDT 2007
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC
real mem = 1073016832 (1023MB)
avail mem = 1030762496 (983MB)
mainbus0 at root
bios0 at mainbus0: SMB
Heinrich Rebehn wrote:
> Reyk Floeter wrote:
>> hi!
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 11:50:03AM +0200, Heinrich Rebehn wrote:
>>> I have successfully set up a client for diskless(8) booting.
>>> However, this works only when booting from the first (onboard) nic.
>>> When i use another nic, the kernel
Reyk Floeter wrote:
hi!
On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 11:50:03AM +0200, Heinrich Rebehn wrote:
I have successfully set up a client for diskless(8) booting.
However, this works only when booting from the first (onboard) nic.
When i use another nic, the kernel still tries to do revarp from the
first n
hi!
On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 11:50:03AM +0200, Heinrich Rebehn wrote:
> I have successfully set up a client for diskless(8) booting.
> However, this works only when booting from the first (onboard) nic.
> When i use another nic, the kernel still tries to do revarp from the
> first nic, which fails
Hi Philip,
thank You match for answer and nice words :).
I am starting be concern for my problem but my "love" for OpenBSD is
stronger then sort problems (data on my web are sorted not correctly) and I
do not want to change system on may server.
Maybe in the nearest feature OpenBSD Develo
Hi list,
I have successfully set up a client for diskless(8) booting.
However, this works only when booting from the first (onboard) nic.
When i use another nic, the kernel still tries to do revarp from the
first nic, which fails.
sys/nfs/nfs_boot.c offers a possibility to override the default
Forgot to mention that this repros on two i386 machines and an amd64.
Hi Ben,
than You for answer. My PostgreSQL instance works fine. The problem is
in OpenBSD unfortunately. PostgreSQL uses COLLATION support served by
operating system and default BSD has C and POSSIX COLLATION. I am looking
for solution for this problem. I need native support for polish lang
On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 11:08:48AM +0200, Marc Espie wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 11:36:24AM +0300, Paul Irofti wrote:
> > Since the Hackathon every time I update to the latest snapshots and run
> > a pkg_add -iuv I get fatal errors with random package updates.
> >
> > I usually have to remove
syl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'm not sure if I'm at the right place to ask this question, but I
> might aswell try; I'm writing you this mail because there is one thing
> I can't understand in the openbsd kthread.
>
> Actually, it is those two functions from the kthread's m
On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 11:36:24AM +0300, Paul Irofti wrote:
> Since the Hackathon every time I update to the latest snapshots and run
> a pkg_add -iuv I get fatal errors with random package updates.
>
> I usually have to remove by hand (pkg_delete fails) and reinstall the
> given package.
>
> Th
Since the Hackathon every time I update to the latest snapshots and run
a pkg_add -iuv I get fatal errors with random package updates.
I usually have to remove by hand (pkg_delete fails) and reinstall the
given package.
The errors I get are along the lines of:
qt3-mt-3.7p5 (deleting): complete
U
48 matches
Mail list logo
