On 1/15/08, Chris Kuethe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i doubt it's your machine not being happy with number of connections -
i routinely have hundreds of states. depends on your modem, maybe? or
who made the board inside your modems? or what crack-addled rhesus
monkey pretended to write the
On 2008/01/14 19:40, johan beisser wrote:
The hardware is a slightly loaded Soekris net4501 with 64mb of RAM
running OpenBSD 4.1 (GENERIC).
This will handle much more traffic if you upgrade to 4.2.
On Monday 14 January 2008 23:00, you wrote:
Hey guys!!! (with special request for Theor pls!)
Theo, I need a favor big guy! (only an easy one this time, I swear to it
sir! LOLSLS)!
See, we have the audit happening here at the bank this time and it's
causing me a lot of headaches and pains.
Assumption of Vendor Liability
Doesnt every license free the programmer from any liability?
* THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED ``AS IS'' AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED
WARRANTIES,
* INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY
* AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE
Bonjour,
Suite ` la progression constante des litiges liis aux diptts frauduleux
des noms de domaine,
il est disormais primordial pour une entreprise de protiger sa marque ou
sa raison sociale sur Internet.
Le nom de domaine est devenu un viritable enjeu commercial pour les
sociitis.
Tous les
Dusty [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I thought trolls came from Norway, or that area. we should organise a troll
hunting trip.
Fortunately they keep to the hills, and rarely come down to the coast
(except maybe on weekends)
--
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team
On 14/01/2008, scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
***
Analogy: You're on a highway with a posted speed of 100 km/h. You want
to operate your car and your car only 25 km/h only on the 100 km/h
highway.
***
And for this happy privilege, you want to impose the attendant nuisance
(highway
Peter N. M. Hansteen schrieb:
Dusty [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I thought trolls came from Norway, or that area. we should organise a troll
hunting trip.
Fortunately they keep to the hills, and rarely come down to the coast
(except maybe on weekends)
Do we need a BSD ;-) :-D
Yo,
Just wondering if anyone has used an USB Ethernet adapter on a USB 1.1
port and what's the average transfer rate like for things like scp
files to another computer on the LAN.
Thanks.
--
Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments.
See
On 2008/01/16 01:46, Sunnz wrote:
Just wondering if anyone has used an USB Ethernet adapter on a USB 1.1
port and what's the average transfer rate like for things like scp
files to another computer on the LAN.
here's some times from ftp of 149189112 bytes from a fast
sender on my LAN to an
What is recommended for using a second machine to compile a kernel for
the soekris?
I would like to build a streamlined kernel to run on a net4801. I'm
running into problems though.
'make depend' runs without error, but then 'make' comes up with many
errors like the following:
take a look at one of the stripped embedded OpenBSD builds out there,
flashdist or flashboot.
diana
Chris Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think my CPU is way too slow to be able to handle the GigE link and the
filter. Aren't there any tweaks for pf.conf/sysctl?
Your CPU only gets used for packets that you actually receive. Your
performance between a gig card and a 100m card is probably
On Jan 15, 2008, at 1:35 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2008/01/14 19:40, johan beisser wrote:
The hardware is a slightly loaded Soekris net4501 with 64mb of RAM
running OpenBSD 4.1 (GENERIC).
This will handle much more traffic if you upgrade to 4.2.
I thought the performance improvement
This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification.
Delivery to the following recipients failed permanently:
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 2008/01/15 09:13, johan beisser wrote:
On Jan 15, 2008, at 1:35 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2008/01/14 19:40, johan beisser wrote:
The hardware is a slightly loaded Soekris net4501 with 64mb of RAM
running OpenBSD 4.1 (GENERIC).
This will handle much more traffic if you upgrade to
On Tuesday, January 15, 2008 at 09:13:02 -0800, johan beisser wrote:
On Jan 15, 2008, at 1:35 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
This will handle much more traffic if you upgrade to 4.2.
I thought the performance improvement came from 4.1 with the removal
of per packet interrupts.
The closest
you keep saying that you aren't maxing out your bandwidth, but if you
only have 512Kbps upstream, it would be very easy to do. do you have
any idea how much upstream bandwidth you are using between all of your BT
connections?
Max Hayden Chiz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 13, 2008 6:03 PM,
Hi all,
I got hold of an older Dell server with a PERC 4/DI raid controller,
including 2 SCSI disks. I found the docs over at Dell.
Am I right in understanding once I have my array in place through the
BIOS the OpenBSD OS has nothing to do with the RAID setup?
Or should I leave the bios setup
On Jan 15, 2008, at 9:34 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
I thought the performance improvement came from 4.1 with the
removal of per
packet interrupts.
http://www.openbsd.org/42.html
Huge performance improvements in the network stack, including:
# In pf, store routing table ID, queue ID etc
yeah, openbsd won't setup the RAID volumes, it will only alert you if
they fail
Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I got hold of an older Dell server with a PERC 4/DI raid controller,
including 2 SCSI disks. I found the docs over at Dell.
Am I right in understanding once I have my array
On Jan 15, 2008 7:43 PM, Chris Cappuccio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
you keep saying that you aren't maxing out your bandwidth, but if you
only have 512Kbps upstream, it would be very easy to do. do you have
any idea how much upstream bandwidth you are using between all of your BT
connections?
On Tuesday 15 January 2008 19:53:10 you wrote:
On Tue, 15 Jan 2008, Deanna Phillips wrote:
Thanks for testing. The tarball has been updated with a handful
of changes, including a patch from kurt@ to fix the shared
memory leak.
Anyone want to ok it?
On Jan 15, 2008 11:34 AM, Lars NoodC)n [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is recommended for using a second machine to compile a kernel for
the soekris?
I would like to build a streamlined kernel to run on a net4801. I'm
running into problems though.
'make depend' runs without error, but then
Matt wrote:
Hi all,
I got hold of an older Dell server with a PERC 4/DI raid controller,
including 2 SCSI disks. I found the docs over at Dell.
Am I right in understanding once I have my array in place through the
BIOS the OpenBSD OS has nothing to do with the RAID setup?
setup, no.
Richard Daemon wrote:
Are you compiling from i386 or amd64, or other? Is it -current, -stable or
-release that you're compiling?
-stable
on i386
OpenBSD compilorama 4.2 GENERIC#375 i386
Personally, I just run 4.2-stable on my Soekris Wrap boxes as well as my
Yeah the regular installation
Hi Everyone
We recently purchased an Intel PRO/1000 GT Quad Port network card and
decided to run some stress tests to make sure it could maintain gigabit
connections on all four ports at the same time. I ran the test with five
computers and iperf-1.7.0 (newest version of iperf has speed issues
On Tuesday 15 January 2008 18:13:15 Chris Cappuccio wrote:
Chris Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think my CPU is way too slow to be able to handle the GigE link and the
filter. Aren't there any tweaks for pf.conf/sysctl?
Your CPU only gets used for packets that you actually receive. Your
Jonathan Steel wrote:
Is there any explanation for the speed difference? I have tried tweeking
some sysctl values to no avail. Is there something else I can test for on
the card? I'd be happy to run these tests again for any changes that are
made.
Use 4.2 and Henning did provide details a few
On Jan 15, 2008 8:17 PM, Nick Holland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matt wrote:
Hi all,
I got hold of an older Dell server with a PERC 4/DI raid controller,
including 2 SCSI disks. I found the docs over at Dell.
Am I right in understanding once I have my array in place through the
BIOS the
On Jan 15, 2008 12:06 PM, Chris Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 15 January 2008 18:13:15 Chris Cappuccio wrote:
Have you tried disabling apm? pcibios? What does your dmesg look like?
No, I haven't. I can try it at the weekend, but since the problem only
appears when I enable pf I
Pierre Riteau wrote:
[re: ami(4) RAID card]
I've never used such hardware, but isn't sensorsd a good tool to
monitor the drives attached? ami(4) tells me that disk status is
exposed under hw.sensors.
Draw your own conclusions:
~ $ sysctl hw.sensors
hw.sensors.ami0.drive0=online (sd0), OK
On Jan 15, 2008 11:43 AM, Chris Cappuccio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
you keep saying that you aren't maxing out your bandwidth, but if you
only have 512Kbps upstream, it would be very easy to do. do you have
any idea how much upstream bandwidth you are using between all of your BT
connections?
OpenBSD Team:
Pure Party is now hosting a HTTP mirror at http://pureparty.org/pub/OpenBSD/ .
This is rsync'ed on a daily basis from other OpenBSD mirrors. We are
hosting this because we use OpenBSD as our server's operating system
and wish to support it in this way. Feel free to include this in
Hi list,
How can I detect all the access point around me ???, I
need this for to know which is the nearest. I use
OpenBSD 4.2
Thanks and regards
!Capacidad ilimitada de almacenamiento en tu correo!
No
On Tuesday 15 January 2008 16:30:07 Rafael Morales wrote:
Hi list,
How can I detect all the access point around me ???, I
need this for to know which is the nearest. I use
OpenBSD 4.2
Thanks and regards
man ifconfig
Pay special attention to the -M option.
--STeve Andre'
- Original Message -
From: Rafael Morales [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: misc@openbsd.org
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2008 10:30 AM
Subject: detecting access point
Hi list,
How can I detect all the access point around me ???, I
need this for to know which is the nearest. I use
OpenBSD 4.2
Rafael Morales wrote:
Hi list,
How can I detect all the access point around me ???, I
need this for to know which is the nearest. I use
OpenBSD 4.2
Thanks and regards
!Capacidad ilimitada de
ifconfig -M
-M Show the results of an access point scan. In Host AP mode, this
will dump the list of known nodes without scanning.
If you want more detailed info about the APs, try kismet.
2008/1/15 Rafael Morales [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi list,
How can I detect all the access point around me
--- Max Hayden Chiz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My original test was capped at 384Kbps (i.e. 48KBps). I have tried it
with 256Kbps (32KBps), 128Kbps (16KBps), etc. I have also managed to
sustain HTTP and FTP connections to my server at 500+Kbps for days at
a time with no problems before. If
On Jan 15, 2008, at 5:23 PM, Brian wrote:
How are you testing for latency, so I can duplicate on my side?
When I was doing my tests, I was running a simple ICMP echo through
the default queue (what bittorrent runs in). Were I to test this
again, I'd probably run a full test using
Thanks Stuart that's very nice to know!
Thanks to all in the list that helped me
Ragards
Enviado desde mi iPhone
On 15/01/2008, at 18:37, Dusty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ifconfig -M
-M Show the results of an access point scan. In Host AP mode, this
will dump the list of known nodes without scanning.
If you want more detailed info
Ladies and Gentlemen, lend me your eyes for a brief moment
for some feeble words of praise for your efforts.
The other day a friend of mine, for whom I have installed an OpenBSD
system, mentioned that he had costly experience in the past with small
shops and proprietary systems that cannot
44 matches
Mail list logo
